SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

And the prizefor the ugliest aircraft goes to...

21085 views
24 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: United Kingdom / Belgium
And the prizefor the ugliest aircraft goes to...
Posted by djmodels1999 on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 2:05 PM

 

Well, maybe not the ugliest ever, but this one can't be that far away from the top prize..

Let me introduce you to the Breguet 270.  Designed in 1929, it entered service within French reconnaissance squadrons in December 1932.  140 of them were built.  By 1937, they were already in reserve groups, but were recalled for duty in September 1939, basically to provide German pilots with easy targets.  Lacking more modern replacements, over 50 were still serving in front line squadrons by May 1940.  The Germans scrappedthefew left at the end of the French campaign.

Not much good to say about this ugly duckling, really, other than it had a fairly modern design, i.e., all-metal, at the time of its conception.  This model is built from the 1/72 Azur kit, a good quality French/Czech short-run manufacturer.  The weird design, in particular the rear fuselage, is what got me interested.  The kit is well detailled (lots of resin in the fuselage halves!), with very fine engraving and raised detail (wing's ribs).  The transparent parts, vacuformed, are the tricky part of the build.  The chosen decoration is that of a machine still flying in 1939, but its fate is uncertain after that.  The kit can be built as a Chinese aircraft too, featuring a different front fuselage and suitable markings. 

 

  

 

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: A Computer in Adrian, (SE) Michigan.
Posted by Lucien Harpress on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 2:18 PM
Really nice build.  Almost has a "Polikarpov R-5" feel to it, only truncated, with the tail attached to a stick.  This is one of those kits I'll probably build eventually.  Always nice seeing something a bit different.
That which does not kill you makes you stranger...
-The Joker
  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Goffstown, NH
Posted by New Hampshire on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 6:14 PM

Ugly!?  I think it is neat!  But then again I LOVE ungainly, ugly aircraft!

Brian

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Orlando, Florida
Posted by ikar01 on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 5:05 AM

I vote for the PZL-23 Karas:http://ww2db.com/image.php?image_id=4104.

It's ugly enough that it can grow on you over time. 

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Naples, FL
Posted by tempestjohnny on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 5:50 AM
Any of the French Amiot bombers of the 30's

 

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: A Spartan in the Wolverine State
Posted by rjkplasticmod on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 10:46 AM

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  I don't find this AC any where near the top of ugliest.  Very nice build BTW, thanks for sharing.

Regards,  Rick

RICK At My Age, I've Seen It All, Done It All, But I Don't Remember It All...
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Cave City, KY
Posted by Watchmann on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 10:48 AM

It looks great, dj!

And for me... the uglier the better. =3

  • Member since
    January 2003
Posted by el_jere on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 10:49 AM
 New Hampshire wrote:

Ugly!?  I think it is neat!  But then again I LOVE ungainly, ugly aircraft!

Brian

 

I think it looks cool, and actualy I don´t think that this plane is ugly, but  I too love the uglys aircrafts! LOL

it´s great to see something diferent once in a wile and look like you did a great job on the kit...

congratulatiosn!

Best regards

Jeremias

Res non verba

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: 40 klicks east of the Gateway
Posted by yardbird78 on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 11:19 AM

The Fairey Gannet looks much worse.  Your model is very nice anyway.

Darwin, O.F.  Alien [alien] 

 

 ,,

The B-52 and me, we have grown old, gray and overweight together.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: A Computer in Adrian, (SE) Michigan.
Posted by Lucien Harpress on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 11:39 AM

Beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder.  In fact, many of my favorite aircraft I like exactly because many others would find them so ugly.  However, there are a small number of aircraft that are so difficult on the eyes that even I can't find any redeeming aesthetic qualities.  Case in point: the PZL LWS.6 Zubr.

Built of different materials, the prototype developed stress cracks very early.  These cracks were simply patched and re-patched until the entire airframe just fell apart.  The second prototype was strenghtened, but the added weight rendered it unable to carry any bombs.

So, ugly, dangerous, AND useless.

That which does not kill you makes you stranger...
-The Joker
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Piedmont Triad, NC (USA)
Posted by oldhooker on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 11:54 AM

Hi DJ,

 Unusual maybe, but certainly not ugly.    It would make the opposing troops on the ground and in the air look twice I'm sure!

 Nice build AND display!! :)

 

Take care,

Frank

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: United Kingdom / Belgium
Posted by djmodels1999 on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 12:19 PM

Thank you for your comments.  Much appreciated.  I guess certain features were dictated by the eventual role of this machine, that of course being aerial reconnaissance: huge wing for stability, truncated fuselage for defense and observation,..).  Other than its unique rear fuselage (the whole fuselage was actually supported by this beam, which is only apparent at the rear), the Breguet 270 was not really that much different from similar aircraft built around 1929.  But of course, it was a time of great and fast-paced changes in aviation, and only 3 years down the line, by the time it entered service, the Breguet was already hopelessly outdated.  Again, as were most other aircraft all over the world by the time they entered service.  

Of course, the sad part is that courageous men (I mean it must have taken some courageous people to go up in the air in an aircraft like this, knowing very well that the enemy had machines like the Me-109 to throw at you) died because those outdated machines were still in service long after they should have been scrapped. 

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Sydney Australia
Posted by seevee on Thursday, May 7, 2009 12:35 AM

Cop this:

 

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Woodbine, MD
Posted by 666Irish on Thursday, May 7, 2009 5:11 AM

I, too, have an afinity for ungainly and unusual vehicles. Aircraft, Cars, Trucks, AFVs.

It's just something about them, like being drawn to the runt of the litter...maybe we feel sorry for them.

My entry into this competition can be found here:

http://www.airplane-pictures.net/images/uploaded-images/2008-1/9620.jpg

She was only a whiskey maker, but he loved her still.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Richmond, Va.
Posted by Pavlvs on Thursday, May 7, 2009 9:25 AM
I have to differ. I've always loved the pregnant guppy! For me, one of the great uggos was the pfaltz triplane. I'm having trouble locating a pic of one right now but trust me, it's pretty homely. I, too have had a fascination for aircraft that function required a bit of sacrifice in the beauty category. Your morane saulnier is unusual looking. Reminds me of the Tupolev ANT 1 fighter. Not to mention the great build job you did. Thanks for the pics.

Any other entries for the all time uggo list?

Deus in minutiae est. Fr. Pavlvs

On the Bench: 1:200 Titanic; 1:16 CSA Parrott rifle and Limber

On Deck: 1/200 Arizona.

Recently Completed: 1/72 Gato (as USS Silversides)

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: United Kingdom / Belgium
Posted by djmodels1999 on Thursday, May 7, 2009 11:09 AM

Here's another 'beauty'..:

It's a Transavia PL-12 Airtruck, a crop duster, which famously appeared in the final instalment of Mad Max..  I scratchbuilt the 'Mad Max' one in 1/48 many many years ago.  It was great fun. 

 

 

  • Member since
    May 2015
Posted by Gordon D. King on Thursday, May 7, 2009 11:35 AM
I agree that the Airtruck is pretty ugly. I have also hoped someone would make a model kit of this. What did you use to scratch build your model? Can you share it with us? Do you have any photos?
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Bournemouth UK
Posted by Luftwoller on Thursday, May 7, 2009 1:58 PM

You want UGLY!! You cant handle, UGLY!!

Beat them,

...Guy

..'Your an embarrassment to the human genus, makes me ashamed to call myself Homo'.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Thursday, May 7, 2009 3:26 PM

So many possibilites - and so many of them made in France:

Maybe the idea was to repulse the Luftwaffe?

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posted by model maniac 96 on Thursday, May 7, 2009 4:08 PM
 Luftwoller wrote:

You want UGLY!! You cant handle, UGLY!!

Beat them,

...Guy

Ok, that is just wrongLaugh [(-D]

"Veni, Vidi, Vici" Julius Caesar: I came, I saw, I conquered.
  • Member since
    January 2003
Posted by el_jere on Thursday, May 7, 2009 7:06 PM
 Luftwoller wrote:

You want UGLY!! You cant handle, UGLY!!

Beat them,

...Guy

 

LOL my dad scratch builded that plane!! Laugh [(-D] but I think it ooks cool...

 

regards

 

Jeremias

Res non verba

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: United Kingdom / Belgium
Posted by djmodels1999 on Friday, May 8, 2009 12:21 AM

Gordon,

For the 'Mad Max' Airtruck, I solely worked from the images of the movie, the video and a tiny 3-view drawing that I had in an encyclopedia.  I'm moving soon, hence most of my doc is boxed away but I'll do my best to look for the info, as I do seem to remember getting, many years later a slightly better set of drawings, possibly in Air International.  I'll send you a PM soon.  

 

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Friday, May 8, 2009 2:16 AM
 chris hall wrote:

So many possibilites - and so many of them made in France:

Maybe the idea was to repulse the Luftwaffe?

Cheers,

Chris.

 

Man, that's hidious! Ìt looks like a mutant Farman Goliath! Yuck [yuck]

What is it?

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Friday, May 8, 2009 4:33 AM

It's the three-engined version of the Farman Jabiru:

Notice that this was designed as an improvement on the original, four-engined, version, which, as was common with four-engined aircraft with two engines arranged push-pull in each nacelle, had cooling problems with the rear-facing engines:

http://www.europeanairlines.no/Airlines_FarmanF121_310704.htm

Cheers,

Chris. 

 

 

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Bournemouth UK
Posted by Luftwoller on Friday, May 8, 2009 3:04 PM
 el_jere wrote:

 

LOL my dad scratch builded that plane!! Laugh [(-D] but I think it ooks cool...

 

regards

 

Jeremias

Jeremias, your dad did a fantastic job on that....THING. It is a beauty for sure.

...Guy

..'Your an embarrassment to the human genus, makes me ashamed to call myself Homo'.
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.