FineScale.com forums are FREE. If you wish to participate you must
LOGIN | REGISTER.
|
Helicopters
Started by rotorwash at 08-11-2007 2:50 PM. Topic has 468 replies.
 
 
|
|
Sort Posts:
|
|
|
|
08-11-2007, 2:50 PM
|
rotorwash

Joined on 01-21-2007
Auburn, Alabama
Posts 1,088
|
|
|
Andy, I get what your saying, but the argument could also be made that the left guns had the brass bags because the tail rotor was on the left side! That's what I was laways led to believe anyhow. Ray
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
08-11-2007, 4:05 PM
|
skypirate1

Joined on 02-08-2007
Posts 260
|
|
|
Ray, Im just going on what ive heard from the 1st Cav Crew guys, though like you say its also possible that on a higher level the reasoning for the left side bag was due to the position of the tail rotor. Though its also worth considering that the left side M60 "ejection port" faced away from the TR and towards the Crew compartment unlike the right side gun, also, as far as i know, the "Slick" door gunners would only usually be allowed to fire on the first initial approach into an LZ at which point they would be on short final, descending and not flying fast enough for spent brass ejected from the right side of the left gun to fly back and towards the tail rotor. Though i could be wrong. If the TR was the main reason behind the bags on slicks,it seems strange that the right side gun was not fitted with them, as the "ejection port" on the right faces the TR direction and shells could fly back and over the tail boom. I suppose it all depends on who tells you what and so far the info ive been given all points away from TR damage as the main reason for the left side bags. Though that doesnt by any means mean im right or that the info i have is right, it just means that as ever there are conflicting accounts of what was going on or why, in Vietnam, which isnt really a surprise. Anyway its all trivial but interesting . Grandad, Well that rules out 778's blade being re-painted . I have no idea what the colour of the blades were, i always presumed (though i shouldnt) that those that were not white were OD but on closer inspection the blades in the photo look black, so thanks for that . You have saved me from a modelling boo boo, as i would have probably painted mine OD (ive gone back and corrected the post with the info you gave me).
While the rest of the crew may be in the same predicament, it's almost always the pilot's job to arrive at the crash site first.
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
08-11-2007, 5:56 PM
|
leadfooterm535i
Joined on 07-27-2007
Miami, FL
Posts 158
|
|
|
I can see what you're saying. In the UH-60, the M-60 is completely out of the CE window, there is no way the pilot can get hit by brass flying out of the ejection port. The only time we HAD to use brass bags was for gunnery, spent brass and links had to be turned in. In real-world missions we put them on both sides for uniformity; but, after a few months of winter we took them off all together, since we had to swing the guns in when climbing to high alttitude, and it was hell swinging in the right side 60 at over 40 knots.
'98-'03 UH-60 Chickenhawk CE "Embrace The Suck, Phantoms!!!" Kris
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
08-11-2007, 11:05 PM
|
Mobe1969

Joined on 07-25-2007
Brisbane, Australia
Posts 67
|
|
|
I see from all the Huey threads I'm going to have to get pickier on the kits I buy. Actually, I feel closer to just giving up before I start. I love Hueys. I made my first Huey when I was about 6 or 7, and it was a bad kit - I still remember the left half of the fuselage had the nose bent down below the windshield so I couldn't even finish it half decent (of course these days I could fix that with some heat and putty. Before today I was looking forward to making my 1/24 Monogram Huey, and thought it was a good kit with good detail. Now, I understand that is it a bad kit with bad detail and scale. Even that new Dragon Huey, which I thought was an utterly awesome model - well, third party patch kits are already out for it to fix up inaccuracies on stuff I have no idea what they really people are talking about. I sort of believe in only doing something if I can do a good job. Now I'm not sure I can. And now that if I'm going to have to buy $70 worth of patches from Eduard for the MRC Huey "Frog" to be able to gain a good level of accuracy and detail, I'm starting to feel like dumping these kits in the bin. I'm thinking I'll just stick to sci fi kits. Something not based in reality where I'm not going to have to worry so much about "fuel pump on the wrong side", or gearbox wrong, or the like... I really am feeling somewhat overwhelmed, dejected, and lost at where to start...
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
08-11-2007, 11:32 PM
|
HeavyArty

Joined on 12-02-2002
Ft Stewart, GA
Posts 6,944
|
|
|
You shouldn't really be discouraged. Most of the things that the AM and PE sets correct are not really huge inaccuracies. Most of them would only be caught by a crew chief or us rivet counters. You can make some very nice Huey kits straight out of the box on most of them. Add a few scratch-built items and you can have a really great looking model. Remember, you only need to build for yourself, not others. If you are happy with it, it is great.
Gino P. Quintiliani Field Artillery --- The KING of BATTLE!!! "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." -- George Orwell HeavyArty's ShowcaseHeavyArty's Showcase II
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
08-11-2007, 11:53 PM
|
Mobe1969

Joined on 07-25-2007
Brisbane, Australia
Posts 67
|
|
|
HeavyArty wrote: | | You shouldn't really be discouraged. Most of the things that the AM and PE sets correct are not really huge inaccuracies. Most of them would only be caught by a crew chief or us rivet counters. You can make some very nice Huey kits straight out of the box on most of them. Add a few scratch-built items and you can have a really great looking model. Remember, you only need to build for yourself, not others. If you are happy with it, it is great. |
|
Thanks for the advise. I've still feel utterly devestated. Especially after seeing that magnificent Huey "Mustang"... The photo etched instrument panels are something I really will take as a minimum from now though. Since I restarted with modelling again, I've tried painting instrument panels, and I still stink... That and etched panel lines vs the old style raised panel lines. That is one reason I'm dumping (or just using for practice) the old hasagewa and monogram kits I have. For the Huey "Frog" model I'll probably pick up the Eduard interior PE kit. For the Monogram 24th Huey, it's fate is undecided... I might park it another 5 years.
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
08-11-2007, 11:57 PM
|
rotorwash

Joined on 01-21-2007
Auburn, Alabama
Posts 1,088
|
|
|
Gino is so right! I have gotten bogged dowm in the details, but I wish I had built a few beforehand just for fun. Besides, just call it a NOSTALGIC BUILD and have FUN! That's what this hobby is supposed to be about in the first place. The world can't have enough Huey models! Ray
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
08-12-2007, 8:28 AM
|
Cobrahistorian

Joined on 12-16-2002
Aaaaah.... Alpha Apaches... A beautiful thing!
Posts 2,730
|
|
|
I'll third that! While we sit here and debate the minutae of Huey details (this panel needs to be fixed, those rivets are too big, that Huey didn't fly with that armament system) we often lose sight of the fact that we're pretty lucky that the Huey kits out there are pretty good and pretty accurate. The MRC kits are some of the best models straight out of the box. Sure there's aftermarket stuff, but don't take those as absolutely necessary in order to build a decent model! As Gino said, build for yourself! This is supposed to be fun!
I know that I have begun to suffer from severe AMS (Advanced Modelers Syndrome) and often have difficulty just building a model straight out of the box. As for Andy's "Mustang 6", well... AMS has become an art form in its own right with him! I just nod, pick my jaw up off the floor and wish I could do something somewhere close to his magic. DON'T BE DISCOURAGED! BUILD THOSE HUEYS! (and don't be afraid to toss in some resin too! ;) ) Jon
 "1-6 is in hot"
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
08-12-2007, 9:49 PM
|
rotorwash

Joined on 01-21-2007
Auburn, Alabama
Posts 1,088
|
|
|
Andy, Just got off the phone with my dad and asked about brass in the cockpit. He told me that it was not unhear of for a little hot brass to find it's way down the neck of particularly ornary pilots! In a gunship with a free gun all it took was a little "creative positioning" of the gun to get brass to go just about anywhere. Any of you other guys heard of this? anyway, I thought you might get a kick out of the story. Ray
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
08-12-2007, 11:01 PM
|
chopperfan

Joined on 11-20-2003
Oklahoma
Posts 2,178
|
|
|
rotorwash wrote: | Andy, Just got off the phone with my dad and asked about brass in the cockpit. He told me that it was not unhear of for a little hot brass to find it's way down the neck of particularly ornary pilots! In a gunship with a free gun all it took was a little "creative positioning" of the gun to get brass to go just about anywhere. Any of you other guys heard of this? anyway, I thought you might get a kick out of the story. Ray |
|
Kinda like "non-lethal fragging".
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
08-12-2007, 11:31 PM
|
Melgyver

Joined on 03-06-2003
Lafayette, LA
Posts 1,715
|
|
|
Putting hot brass down the neck of an "FNG" pilot was sort of a "tradition". Welcome to the "Guns" sort of thing!
Clear Left! Mel
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
08-13-2007, 8:30 AM
|
Chief Snake
Joined on 08-28-2004
Maryland
Posts 218
|
|
|
Hot brass in the cabin was definetly a "weapon" of amusement at the right moment. At the wrong moment though everyone was at the mercy of just how distracting it was to the man on the stick. Chief Snake
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
08-17-2007, 2:37 PM
|
leadfooterm535i
Joined on 07-27-2007
Miami, FL
Posts 158
|
|
|
Just a note for everyone. If you could use some copper wire, let me know what size and how much. I was looking for some stuff in the back shop at work and I found out where the excess copper is going. I saw that and I saw a lost treasure for modelers. I'm not going to sell it, just let me know how much and we'll work something out on how to get it to you. Trust me, there is plenty to go around and all kinds of sizes, although length may vary. Even if it may not be exact, I think I can get close to it. They dump this stuff by the loads. I thought the owner at least sold it for scrap.
'98-'03 UH-60 Chickenhawk CE "Embrace The Suck, Phantoms!!!" Kris
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
09-07-2007, 2:49 AM
|
Howie Belkin
Joined on 03-06-2003
Long Island, NY USA
Posts 49
|
|
|
I'll pile on and add my 2 cents U.S., just build it and enjoy it. I've been building a good 50 yrs now and was a door gunner and love Hueys! If I've learned anything, it's "don't wait for a perfect model, it may never happen" whether out of box or if you use every accessory or improvement parts that come out. Somebody somewhere will still find fault with it! I've seen models go from over sized raised rivets to our fine engraved panel lines and lightly drilled indented dimples representing rivets. Fact is, reality is still not being served. The real Huey had rivets raised up from the surface - and I don't remember any 'fine' engraved lines that scaled up would be significant chanels separating panels! Look at any photos of real Hueys. Modelers will be better served when they accept that 'this is modeling, NOT reality' and never the twain shall meet! Most of the available Huey models are damn nice kits out of the box. If you want to make them better, there IS room for improvement. Add what you want so long as you're still enjoying the build. You'll build a heck of a lot more enjoyable models that way. If you want to build that perfect model, you have all my respect and - God bless! But if you want to simply enjoy modeling like 85% of the rest of us, don't throw out that perfectly good model for some nebulous - ridiculous and fictitious when you get down to it, notion of perfection. 'Build and have fun!' Clear right Howie
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
09-09-2007, 2:48 PM
|
skypirate1

Joined on 02-08-2007
Posts 260
|
|
|
Howie Well said mate ![Thumbs Up [tup]](/emoticons/icon_smile_thumbsup.gif) Andy
While the rest of the crew may be in the same predicament, it's almost always the pilot's job to arrive at the crash site first.
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
09-12-2007, 7:05 PM
|
Melgyver

Joined on 03-06-2003
Lafayette, LA
Posts 1,715
|
|
|
Howie, Transmission received and understood!
Clear Left! Mel
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
09-14-2007, 11:55 AM
|
squeakie
Joined on 06-20-2007
Posts 2,377
|
|
|
rotorwash wrote: | | David, I am more interested in knowing the details from a historical perspective than anything else. Little things like the fact that almost all doorgunners used old C-ration cans to make the feed mechanism work better in their 60's is really trivial to most folks, but I find it interesting and indicative of the "necessity is the mother of invention" mentality that characterized the Vietnam War. No high tech gizmos or computer driven weapons, just good old American inginuity! Ray actually it was called the orange juice can mod. The idea came from infantry units, and the cans were wired to the side of the 60 to make the belt have to drop down into the receiver about 5/8th". The ammo cans they used were huge, and because of that the tended to burn up barrels faster than they could make them. Also take note that a door gunner didn't wear a flak vest, but a metal plate affair. Nobody wore flak vests except Marines and folks stuck in the rear. A bullet going thru a flak vest was considered a death sentence due to expansion. In the movies we often see 60's hanging by a cable, but I never saw one in my 15 months. It was always off a pental affair. With all the hours I had as a passenger in one I never ever saw the seats folded down, and many slicks didn't even have seats in them. I've seen them with twin rocket pods, and a mini gun on each side as well. I've also seen a few that had both rocket pods and mini guns at the same time, but not often. I never saw a grenade launcher mounted on a Huey. gary |
|
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
09-14-2007, 12:03 PM
|
squeakie
Joined on 06-20-2007
Posts 2,377
|
|
|
Melgyver wrote: | | Putting hot brass down the neck of an "FNG" pilot was sort of a "tradition". Welcome to the "Guns" sort of thing! |
|
might sound kinda funny, but I cannot actually remember brass flying around inside the Huey. But I'm sure it did. The one thing I still remember most of all was that everything was a light grey that looked like it had been sand blasted. Lots and lots of wear inside there. gary
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
09-14-2007, 12:48 PM
|
rotorwash

Joined on 01-21-2007
Auburn, Alabama
Posts 1,088
|
|
|
Gary, Thanks for your service, sir! When were you in country and what time period? Whether pintle or bungee or free 60's were used depended on the timeframe, unit, and command SOP for that unit. Believe me, all types of rigs were used to mount the doorguns and my father definitely fired a door mounted MK 18 MOD 0 grenade launcher from the door of one. It was mounted on the brackets for the Sagami mount (the mounting system you would have probably used). Anyway, Welcome to the forum! Please post any Huey pics you have that might be of interest to us here. Ray
|
|
|
|
Report Abuse
|
|
|
|
|
FineScale.com Forums » Modeling Subjects » Helicopters
|
Forum Jump:
|
|