SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

The Official F-4 Phantom II Group Build 2010

227528 views
481 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2005
The Official F-4 Phantom II Group Build 2010
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Friday, January 1, 2010 7:14 AM

The Official Phantom II Group Build 2010

It's start date!

Recapping the particulars:

Start: January 1st 2010, end June 30th 2010, with overrun if needed.

All variants, all users, all markings, all services. All kits, all scales, OOB and AM equally welcome. Started kits -- 10% done or so is fine. Crossovers with other builds also fine.

As I said a fortnight ago: "I'll be launching the proper thread on the GB forum at New Year, ready for a January 1st launch, so we can have our kits, tools, supplies and markings on the catapults and ready to go as the holiday season winds down toward the resumption of business, then a long supersonic cruise to midyear."

It's January 1st, so gentlemen start your turbines! You're clear to break shrinkwrap and cut sprue! Let's buuld some planes to be proud of!

Cheers, Mike/TB379

Update -- as of Feb. 26th on this side of the dateline, we have 33 participants. No builds completed yet but some getting closer -- badges are in the works so they'll be ready when the first planes are rolled out to the squadron line.

 Order of Battle

  • Thunderbolt379 (Host): F-4J (Fujimi, 1:72, with AM decals); possible F-4E 5000th Phantom.
  • TempestJohnny: F-4G (Fujimi, 1:72, probably OOB)
  • Wirraway: RF-4C (Revell, 1:32)
  • 44Mac: F-4C/D (Revell, 1:48)
  • Aagranata: F-4G, (Hasegawa, 1:48, with Leading Edge decals -- 190th FS Idaho ANG)
  • Snoopy: (not decided yet)
  • Bomber Boy: F-4E Thunderbirds (Revell, 1:72, classic four-plane formation)
  • Mongo580: RF-4C (Hasegawa, 1:72, "Carolina Kangaroo")
  • Bushi: F-4C/D conv. to -B standard (Accurate Minitures, 1/72 )
  • Gamera: F-4EK Kai Super Phantom (Hasegawa, 1:48)
  • Helo 53: FR-4E Israeli (Hasegawa, 1:72)
  • Skipper 74134: RF-4B (Hasegawa, 1:48)
  • Army: F-4G (Hasegawa, 1:48, with loads of AMs)
  • Kustommodeler1: F-4C/D (Revell, 1:48) ; F-4E (Academy, 1:144)
  • Stikpusher: RF-4C (Testor, 1:48)
  • Morefirejules08: F-4C/D (Revell-Germany, 1/48, OOB)
  • Jarhead 50 5.0: F-4J (Monogram, 1:48, with poss. AM cockpit)
  • Constructor: F4-C/D (Revell, 1:48 with AMs)
  • Oortiz10: QF-4N (Hasegawa, 1:48, x 2); F-4J (Monogram, 1;48, VMF-333)
  • BONE Fanatic: F-4J (Tamaya, 1/32, Fighting Shamrocks w/ Big Ed and True Details AMs)
  • Kg4kpg: F-4G (Testor, 1:48)
  • Dirkpitt289: F-4(?) (Hasagawa, 1:72, Bicentennial scheme, Robin Olds' plane)
  • Xradio81: F-4D (Revell, 1:48, 35TH TFS, PACAF, Wolf Pack, Kunsan AB, ROK)
  • Buffrin: F-4C/D (AMT, 1/48th, OOB, poss. AM decals)
  • Bob357: F-4E (Tamiya, 1:32)
  • Caribwill: RF-4B (Hasegawa, 1:72, OOB)
  • Gkicsak:  RF-4B/N (Hasegawa, 1:48, OOB)
  • Jmart: RF-4E (Hasegawa, 1:72 'IDF', OOB)
  • Darson: F-4G (Hasegawa, 1:48, loads of AM)
  • Gregbbear: TBA
  • 68GT: F-4G (Testors, 1:72)
  • Cml: F-4G (Tamiya, ex-Italeri, 1:72, OOB); F-4E (Fujimi, 1:72, Aussie decals)
  • FastasEF: RF-4C (Revell, 1:32, OOB)

 

Badges

 

Completed

 25th Apr. 2010  Caribwill

 

25th May 2010  Oortiz10

 

21st June 2010  Gamera

 

25th June 2010  Oortiz

 

25th June 2010  Oortiz

 

24th Aug. 2010  Wirraway

 

2nd Nov. 2010  gregbbear

 

28th Nov. 2010  Xradio81

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: uk
Posted by morefirejules08 on Friday, January 1, 2010 10:01 AM

so who does the group build art that appears at the bottom of posts? (hope that made sense as i dont know what its called!!)

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • From: Endicott, Va.
Posted by Bomber Boy on Friday, January 1, 2010 11:02 AM

it's Jan. 1 we are wearing sunglasses, there's styrene and paint, we got a build, HIT IT!!!!!

James

James Herndon II __-_-_/"\_-_-__

Endicott ,Va

beandawgartworks.com

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Friday, January 1, 2010 3:58 PM

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!!!!!!!

 

All right, I opened the bags to my Revell Germany F4C/D 1:48 and here's what I find...... The classic Monogram mold in it's original form, amazingly crisp and clean for it's age.

The exterior detail is finely raised panel lines and rivets.

For those who strictly like recessed panel lines, I would like to take a second to note that raised detail is not always a bad thing Just take a look at the fuselage detail on the model and this pic of the real thing, and we can see some details are indeed raised:

The underwing detail with the landing gear wells is fairly well represented and will be fun to detail.

The interior detail is fair as well, I could go with some AM stuff, but I'll stick with OOB for sentimental reasons to honor the Monogram name

Wheels are nice. It comes with 2 figures, the pilot standing and the WSO seated.

And again, the decal sheet is one stage I can't wait to get to.

 

Sorry for the long post, just excited to begin that's all!! YEEE-HAAAAA!!

 

 

 

 

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Vancouver, WA
Posted by jarhead_50_5.0 on Friday, January 1, 2010 4:10 PM

Darrin,

that's a great post of the start of your bird for the build.  (hey that kinda rhymes) As you said that kit has some teriffic details.  The cockpit tub looks identical to my kit which is an old monogram from 1983.  I'm very exited to be part of the group and loko forward to hearing/seeing everyones progress! 

Respectfully, Erik.

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Friday, January 1, 2010 5:34 PM

MFJ -- I'll be organising the badges (yep, a selection) from this end, my sister did a superb job on the badges for Achtraden, so she's got the commission for these too. Expect them to be forthcoming!

KM1 -- nice big first post, this is gonna be a colourful GB with lots of Rhino action!

Men, today's sortie will be a basic reconaissance. The squadron will assemble at the maintnenance sheds for inspection of basic materials, then proceed to detailed examination of projections for conditions ahead. This will involve structural analysis and consideration of aesthetic presentation. You'll be double-checking available toolkits, supplies and special supplementary packages for the augmentation of your aircraft. All right, men, let's get to it!

Cheers, Mike/TB379

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Friday, January 1, 2010 6:18 PM

Bone Fanatic- welcome to the build!

Kustommodeler- looks like she's going to be a fine build. I'm really impressed with the detail on the standing pilot.

I'm not cool enough to get invited to New Year's parties so I worked on the pilot and the weapon system officer (not sure of the exact term) today:

I'll try to get them installed in their office by the end of the weekend.

 

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Charleston, SC
Posted by kg4kpg on Friday, January 1, 2010 6:57 PM

I'd like to join please.  Only Phantom I have left is a Testors 1/48 F-4G so that will be the one for me.

Chris

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Friday, January 1, 2010 10:40 PM

Hi Chris, welcome to the squadron, I'll update the Order of Battle with your details.

Gamera, those Tamiya pilots look superb!

Cheers, Mike/TB379

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Between LA and OC, SoCal
Posted by oortiz10 on Saturday, January 2, 2010 12:10 AM

OK gang,

I've never mashed plastic in a FSM GB.  Is this where we post our build threads?

Just asking to make sure I'm planting stuff where it should be.

Cheers!

-O

 

 

-It's Omar, but they call me "O".

  • Member since
    June 2008
Posted by lewbud on Saturday, January 2, 2010 12:59 AM

Mike,

I'd love to jump in but one of my resolutions was not to oversubscribe to group builds this year.  However, if time permits I'd be in with either a 1/72 Revell Germany RF-4E in Tiger Meet markings or the Italeri RF-4C.

Buddy- Those who say there are no stupid questions have never worked in customer service.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Saturday, January 2, 2010 2:56 AM

OK got the basics of the cockpit done, just gotta add the wear and tear, but only a little.......

 

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Saturday, January 2, 2010 5:53 AM

Oortiz -- yep, post your build log, installment by installment, right here, complete with pics -- quality of shots doesn't have to be great, it's the build that counts!

Lewbud -- terrific, if you can squeeze out a Phantom by midyear you're more than welcome!

KM1 -- you're chewing into that build already, great work!

Cheers, Mike/TB379

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Between LA and OC, SoCal
Posted by oortiz10 on Saturday, January 2, 2010 11:40 AM

Alright, since I got sucked into this Phantom GB...and it's after the first…lets build!

 

I bought Hasegawa’s QF-4N second-hand from a seller on another board. 

 

 

I’ve never built a Hase kit (gasp!) or a Phantom (gag!), so I figured I’d try my hand at this one since I got it for a steal.  The seller included some resin bits and a couple of other nice extras.  (Thanks Dan!)  Don't know if I'll use 'em though, but they're nice to have.  We'll see.  He did tell me when I bought it that he had sanded down the cockpit sidewall detail because he planned on using an AM cockpit set.  Well he never got around to it and sold it to me, sans the cockpit set.

 

I figured it was no biggie since I build my kits with closed canopies.  My thought was that no one woulda seen the sidewall anyway, so it really wouldn’t be missed. 

 

So I went to my LHS after work yesterday to pick up a few odd-n-ends for the build, when lo and behold, what do I see?  The same kit sitting on the counter!  There’s a Post-It note stuck to it saying it was for sale.  I asked the clerk about it, and apparently a private seller was looking to get rid of it.  It was being offered well below retail, so I snatched it up.  Now I have two Phantoms to build!  (What am I getting myself in to…?)

 

When I get home I crack open the second kit and…TADA!  There’s a surprise in there for me!  A copy of the old Microscale sheet, 48-73, with two Navy and one USAF jets on the sheet. 

 

 

It’s a no-brainer!  One of my Phantoms is gonna be a VF-111 Sundowner.  No, has to be!  I just hope the decals hold together.  Who knows how old these things are?  I don’t, but I’m guessing they’re pretty old.  The price sticker on the decal sleeve says $2.25!  Uh…before you ask though, I have no idea what markings I’m gonna dress the second jet in...so don't ask. Stick out tongue

 

The Spring semester doesn’t start until Jan 25, so I gotta get as much done on these builds as I can before then.  Time will be thin once school starts.  With that in mind, I start building… 

 

I learned that the USN/USMC didn’t have flight controls in the back seat of their Phantoms, so out came the Dremel and away went the control stick mount.  Then I scabbed over the area with a small square of styrene.

 

 

I know wunna yous is gonna ask, “Why’d you bother with the control stick if you didn’t bother with the side panels or the Navy vs USAF cockpit?”  Answer is, because a hole in the floor is more obvious (to me at least, and that’s all that matters) than the slight difference in/lack of instrumentation.

 

I spent the first day of 2010 working on the cockpits.  I got one done but ran into a problem when I went to dry fit it in place.

 

First, the finished cockpit:

 

 

It’s mostly OOB, except for the lead foil seatbelts.  I know the belt pattern isn’t accurate, but I was going for “representation,” not “duplication.”  Besides, since my cockpits are always closed, they’re simply an effort to “busy up” the office.

 

Now, the first problem of the new year…

 

As I handled the assorted parts from both kits, I noticed a slight difference in the fuse halves.  I couldn’t quite put my finger on it until I really looked closely.

 

The fuse halves from the first second-hand kit I bought, was not only missing the sidewall detail (which I expected), but also part of the cockpit structure.

 

 

Cue Homer

 

You can see the fuse half missing the structure taped to a fuse half that has the structure.  (Apparently, you can also see how dirty my camera body is.  YIKES!)   Oh well, building has stalled at this point until I can figure out how to engineer a replacement part.  Not a big deal, it’s just that I didn’t expect that.  Hmm…

 

Anyway, that’s my first installment.  I don’t have to be back at work until Tues, so I hope to get more done and posted soon.

 

Thanks for looking!  Don’t forget to drop your two cents in the bucket on the way out.

 

Cheers!

-O

 

-It's Omar, but they call me "O".

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Panama City, Florida, Hurricane Alley
Posted by berny13 on Saturday, January 2, 2010 3:20 PM

You can't build a Navy/Marine F-4B/N using the F-4C/D model.  The F-4B/N had the thin wing and small main wheels and tires.  The rear cockpit did not have side consoles.  The rear instrument panel was completly different.  The IFR probe was located on the right side by the rear cockpit.  On AF jets it had the IFR receptacle is on the back bone just aft of the rear canopy.  There were many more diferences but not as visible as I just mentioned.  

Berny

 Phormer Phantom Phixer

On the bench

TF-102A Delta Dagger, 32nd FIS, 54-1370, 1/48 scale. Monogram Pro Modeler with C&H conversion.  

Revell F-4E Phantom II 33rd TFW, 58th TFS, 69-260, 1/32 scale. 

Tamiya F-4D Phantom II, 13th TFS, 66-8711, 1/32 scale.  F-4 Phantom Group Build. 

 

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Saturday, January 2, 2010 5:33 PM

Oortiz -- berny13 is right in that there were multiple minor changes between the Navy/Marines and USAF series Phantoms. (I'll have to check my refs, I was under the impression the thicker wing was on the -B model to accommodate beefy landing gear for carrier ops, and this was deleted to save weight and frontal area on the USAF model...) But if I'm reading your message correctly, you're not intending to cross-build -- the kit depicts a Navy-series airframe with all the bits and pieces that go with it, so the Sundowners decals would be appropriate, there would be perhaps only a few minor points to attend to to backdate an -N airframe to its -B predecessor.

Now, as far the easiest fix for that missing element of the cockpit structure -- my first impression is this: CA a scrap of stripstock under the existing part on the left fuselage half, to extend across the gap close to the right wall when they're joined. Assemble the fuselage, then you'll have a precise area measurement available. Cut and file some pieces of strip stock to match the dimensions of the inter-cockpit bridge on the left and glue them down onto the first piece of stock, so you build up the straight, stepped appearance on the right. Fill, sand, paint, and under the intercockpit canopy section nobody should be able to see anything amiss. How does that sound?

Cheers, Mike/TB379

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Panama City, Florida, Hurricane Alley
Posted by berny13 on Saturday, January 2, 2010 7:08 PM

Thunderbolt379

Oortiz -- berny13 is right in that there were multiple minor changes between the Navy/Marines and USAF series Phantoms. (I'll have to check my refs, I was under the impression the thicker wing was on the -B model to accommodate beefy landing gear for carrier ops, and this was deleted to save weight and frontal area on the USAF model...) But if I'm reading your message correctly, you're not intending to cross-build -- the kit depicts a Navy-series airframe with all the bits and pieces that go with it, so the Sundowners decals would be appropriate, there would be perhaps only a few minor points to attend to to backdate an -N airframe to its -B predecessor.

Cheers, Mike/TB379

Just the opposite.  The USAF specified anti lock brakes and larger brakes for short runway landing so MDD gave the USAF Phantoms larger gear.  It also had the bulge on top of the wing and gear doors.  The Monogram kit is really a F-4C with the larger gear and wing bulge.  The cockpit is for the F-4C and has the side consoles which no Navy jet had.  The F-4N was rebuilt F-4B's with slotted stabs, ECM up grade and still had the thin wheels of the F-4B.  The Monogram kit can not be used to build the F-4B/N aircraft.  It can be used as a starting point for the F-4J which had the thick wing.

Berny

 Phormer Phantom Phixer

On the bench

TF-102A Delta Dagger, 32nd FIS, 54-1370, 1/48 scale. Monogram Pro Modeler with C&H conversion.  

Revell F-4E Phantom II 33rd TFW, 58th TFS, 69-260, 1/32 scale. 

Tamiya F-4D Phantom II, 13th TFS, 66-8711, 1/32 scale.  F-4 Phantom Group Build. 

 

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: near Nashville, TN
Posted by TarnShip on Sunday, January 3, 2010 12:47 AM

Oortiz, that F-4N is one of the cool choices in the USN,,,,,151000 combines the VF-111 markings that we all enjoy,,,,,with an N conversion that didn't get the DECM cable conduits on the intake sides,,,,,,,VF-51 had aircraft during the same time period (1975) in that same configuration,,,,,,,,it also had the early type nose IR sensor, with the late type tail tip, and slotted stabs,,,,,,,,,pretty interesting aircraft to a Phantom fan

enjoy your build

Rex

almost gone

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Hickory, NC
Posted by Bushi on Sunday, January 3, 2010 8:57 AM

Hey everyone thought I would post this, a pic of a F-4B. As soon as the temp goes up some this week I will go out to the airport and take a few up close and some cockpit shots.

Bushi

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Vancouver, WA
Posted by jarhead_50_5.0 on Sunday, January 3, 2010 3:40 PM

A quick question for those of you who know the history of the Phantom: according to my research the lack of an internal cannon was finally resolved with the F-4E model production.  Why does my F-4J not have one then? It should be mounted centerline under the nose, right?

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Panama City, Florida, Hurricane Alley
Posted by berny13 on Sunday, January 3, 2010 3:51 PM

jarhead_50_5.0

A quick question for those of you who know the history of the Phantom: according to my research the lack of an internal cannon was finally resolved with the F-4E model production.  Why does my F-4J not have one then? It should be mounted centerline under the nose, right?

The F-4J didn't have the gun because the Navy didn't want it.  They were offered a navalized version of the F-4E with a gun but turned it down and went with the missile armed F-4j.

Berny

 Phormer Phantom Phixer

On the bench

TF-102A Delta Dagger, 32nd FIS, 54-1370, 1/48 scale. Monogram Pro Modeler with C&H conversion.  

Revell F-4E Phantom II 33rd TFW, 58th TFS, 69-260, 1/32 scale. 

Tamiya F-4D Phantom II, 13th TFS, 66-8711, 1/32 scale.  F-4 Phantom Group Build. 

 

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Sunday, January 3, 2010 5:39 PM

Am I stuck with only one bird, or can I add another one?

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Sunday, January 3, 2010 5:47 PM

Berny -- thanks for the info, you're a Phantom guru!

Km -- not at all, build as many as you like! The more the merrier, I'm hoping for at least two myself.

Cheers, Mike/TB379

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Vancouver, WA
Posted by jarhead_50_5.0 on Sunday, January 3, 2010 9:54 PM

Berny,

Thanks for sorting that out for me.  As a follow on question for you, when the N and S models came on line with the Navy, I thought the squids had wised up and fitted them with guns?  Or atleast I though I had run across photos of them in that configuration. 

Thanks again.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Panama City, Florida, Hurricane Alley
Posted by berny13 on Sunday, January 3, 2010 10:09 PM

jarhead_50_5.0

Berny,

Thanks for sorting that out for me.  As a follow on question for you, when the N and S models came on line with the Navy, I thought the squids had wised up and fitted them with guns?  Or atleast I though I had run across photos of them in that configuration. 

Thanks again.

The only guns they could carry was gun pods.  The Marines carried gun pods on the centerline for ground attack.  The Navy did not arm their F-4B/J/N/S with gun pods.  It could be the gun pods were designed by USAF engineers and built for USAF Phantoms, the Navy didn't want to use something designed for the USAF.  Eventually many other countries bought the gun pods and used them on many different type aircraft.  For some reason the USN didn't.

Berny

 Phormer Phantom Phixer

On the bench

TF-102A Delta Dagger, 32nd FIS, 54-1370, 1/48 scale. Monogram Pro Modeler with C&H conversion.  

Revell F-4E Phantom II 33rd TFW, 58th TFS, 69-260, 1/32 scale. 

Tamiya F-4D Phantom II, 13th TFS, 66-8711, 1/32 scale.  F-4 Phantom Group Build. 

 

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: near Nashville, TN
Posted by TarnShip on Sunday, January 3, 2010 10:40 PM

Jarhead,,,,,,,the USN/USMC gun pods were Hipegs, not the SUU-16 or 23,,,,,,all three are in Hasegawa weapons sets in 1/72 and 1/48

if you use a Hasegawa Hipeg,,,,,,the nose is just a square,,,,it should be a figure 8 seen from head on,,,,,,with one muzzle above the other

almost gone

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Between LA and OC, SoCal
Posted by oortiz10 on Monday, January 4, 2010 11:50 AM

Sorry for the confusion gang, but Mike's right.  I'm not trying to cross-build.  I can build a -N from the Hasegawa boxing (not Revellogram's), and that's my plan.  I may have not been clear in my original post, but my goal is to build two Navy versions without fudging Hasegawa's USAF cockpit.  From what I understand, the cockpit molding in Hase USN/USMC is USAF's version.  So I'm building two USN jets using Hase's USAF plastic.  I only omitted the control stick; I didn't hassle with the cockpit panels.  Hopefully that makes sense.

Hey Berny, from what I gathered you're the resident FSM Phantom guru.  Is your expertise in USAF or USN jets?  Or across the board?  I'm hoping I can pick your brain during this build, since I know nothing about the Phantoms...and it's many many versions.

If I'm lucky, I'll have more to post today sometime...

Stay tuned!

-O

 

 

-It's Omar, but they call me "O".

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Panama City, Florida, Hurricane Alley
Posted by berny13 on Monday, January 4, 2010 3:09 PM

oortiz10

Hey Berny, from what I gathered you're the resident FSM Phantom guru.  Is your expertise in USAF or USN jets?  Or across the board?  I'm hoping I can pick your brain during this build, since I know nothing about the Phantoms...and it's many many versions.

I worked on USAF Phantoms for over twenty years.  I also worked DEPOT during that time on the F-4.  While at DEPOT I had the occasion to work on Navy and Marine F-4B/N/and J models.  I also worked training GAF ground crews on the German Phantoms.   My last trip to Germany I was certified on all NATO F-4 aircraft as well as USN and Marine Phantoms.  So you might say I know something about every F-4 Phantom built.

Berny

 Phormer Phantom Phixer

On the bench

TF-102A Delta Dagger, 32nd FIS, 54-1370, 1/48 scale. Monogram Pro Modeler with C&H conversion.  

Revell F-4E Phantom II 33rd TFW, 58th TFS, 69-260, 1/32 scale. 

Tamiya F-4D Phantom II, 13th TFS, 66-8711, 1/32 scale.  F-4 Phantom Group Build. 

 

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Between LA and OC, SoCal
Posted by oortiz10 on Monday, January 4, 2010 7:23 PM

berny13

...I had the occasion to work on Navy and Marine F-4B/N/and J models...I was certified on all NATO F-4 aircraft as well as USN and Marine Phantoms.  So you might say I know something about every F-4 Phantom built...

Well Berny, I hope you don’t mind me asking stupid questions because I’m sure I’ll have a few over the course of this build...

 

Anyway, let’s get on to part two, shall we?

 

If you remember, one of my second-hand Hase Phantoms had all the cockpit sidewall detail sanded off for an aftermarket ‘pit.  Since I’m on a pretty tight modeling budget, I opted to use the kit’s ‘pit.  I also decided to add the pilots to the office to hopefully distract anyone from noticing the missing detail.  In my first attempt at modeling some figures, I thought I’d take a little extra time and try a few other firsts with the pilots.  (Thanks for the inspiration Gamera!)

 

I started with some solder and fine copper wire (taken from an old electrical cord)…

 

 

 and wrapped the former with the latter to create new oxygen hoses. 

 

 

(Disclaimer:  Sorry, but since the wife had the camera for the day, I was unable to take some in-progress shots of the following sequence.) 

I also hacked up the back-seater’s arms and posed ‘em in a more relaxed position (i.e. holding on for dear life).  On the driver, I used some arms I had in my spares box that allowed him to hold the stick & throttle better than the kit provided arms.  Some white Milliput  filled all the gaps on the crew.  After the guys were painted up, I brushed some Future onto their bone-domes and visors.  The glossy finish gave me the right look and helped with the next step.  I used some spare red decals to create their helmet art.  I busted out an old-school hole-punch (sadly, no punch-n-die set for me) to get a dot of red, and then cut that in half for the semi-circles.  Then I cut thin strips for the “rays.”   Once in place, a little bit of Solvaset got everything to snuggle down nicely.  After the decals were dry, I brushed on a little more Future to seal and shine everything up.  The pilots were then set in place and next came the hoses.  I CAed those to the masks, and since the solder was nice and flexible, I was able to position ‘em right where I wanted ‘em.  Finally, I cut some thin strips of masking tape for seatbelts; three strips per figure.  They each have a lap belt and a shoulder harness.  I know the pattern isn’t accurate, but it does make the crew look like they’re strapped in and ready for action.  I left the belts the tape’s original color.  I thought it contrasted nicely with their green flight suits.  

 

Seat backs and tray tables in their upright and stored position:

 

 

 

Back-seater:

 

 

Driver:

 

 

Beyond that, I was looking at the Hase kit and realized that, with a little work, it can be built as –B model.  I decided to build the –N of VF-111, then build one as a –B and use Superscale’s VF-84 decals.  I know, I know, some people are sick of the bones, but I really like the look of their early “pirate flag” scheme.

 

So to start, I filled the back end of the –B’s tail ECM with Milliput.  Since it’s hollow and gonna be sanded off, I needed something back there to fill the void. 

 

 

While the putty dried, I took the time to clean up the three canopy sets and dipped ‘em in Future.

 

Wait.  What?  Did he say three?

 

I did.

 

While out walking the dog early yesterday morning, I run across a house having a yard sale.  The family asks if they can meet my pup, and while they do, I take a sec to have a look-see.  Guess what I find…

 

 

Now I have something to dress up in VMFA-333 colors!  (I also pick up Revell’s 1/48 F-15E.  Each for a buck!)

 

Since my Hase Phantoms are in between subassemblies, I start on the Revellogram –J.

 

 

And that’s where I stop. 

 

So, what?  That makes three Phantoms now?  This is turning into a personal group build within the group build!  I just hope I can get ‘em all done before the deadline.  *gulp*  Wish me luck!

 

Again, thanks for looking.  Feel free to comment.  Stay tuned for part three!

 

Cheers!

-O

 

 

 

-It's Omar, but they call me "O".

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Guam
Posted by sub revolution on Monday, January 4, 2010 7:40 PM

Hey Bushi-

Where is that Phantom in your picture. Looks like a nice outdoor museum!

NEW SIG

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.