SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

1940 King Tigers & P40 Spitfires

769 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2020
  • From: North East of England
1940 King Tigers & P40 Spitfires
Posted by Hutch6390 on Saturday, September 5, 2020 6:28 PM

My modelling is part of a wider interest in history, especially military history.  I'm sure this is also true of many others.  So, I buy and read many books of this nature, covering a wide range of subjects within that area - submarine warfare, aircraft development, armoured operations, campaigns, battles, unit histories - there's a lot out there to learn, and a lot of good books.  I also watch many documentaries and, sadly, some of these are not so good.

I recently watched one about the German invasion of France & the Low Countries in May 1940.  There is a much-used piece of film from later in the war showing a unit of King Tigers, assembled in ranks, commanders in turret hatches, with (presumably) the unit commander's tank driving along the front rank.  This was included in the documentary, illustrating the German invasion forces - no wonder they won!

Another programme on the development & wartime career of the Spitfire contained some real howlers - a clip of gun-camera film showing a He111 being shot up was immediately followed by images of a Westland Lysander crashing into the sea.  Later, as the commentator spoke about Spitfires' deployment in the Western Desert, the accompanying film was a series of clips showing Hurricanes & P-40s - not a Spitfire amongst them!  Maybe I'm just getting picky in my old age...Smile

 

 

Perhaps we should offer our services to the documentary makers as "proof-viewers" - anyone else spotted any good slip-ups?

Vell, Zaphod's just zis guy, you know?

   

TakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakka

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Saturday, September 5, 2020 6:49 PM

The line up of Tiger II's was this one i take it.

This wasn't on the BBC by any chance was it, they are masters at re-writing history. I recall a piece on BBC news, last year or the year before, about British MTB's. Firtsly it made out that we invented the concept. Then part way through, it went on about MTB's being the Spitfires of the sea because they were so fast and showed a boat zipping through the water (but the boat was a German S-Boat) then the next second it talked about them sinking ships far larger than them while showing footage of a large ship exploding (which happened to be HMS Barham which was sunk by a U-Boat).

My favorite is Dan Snow. That guy is to history what i am to brain surgery. He was doing a piece a few years back about ejection seats. He stood in the Martin baker factory surround by the seats that had built over the years and implied that the first live ejection was conducte with a martin baker seat in 1946. He could have just checked the Martin baker website which gives the history of ejection seats. It would have told him that the first live ejection took place in later 42 early 43 from a German aircraft, that the Germans ha around i think 60 live ejections during the war and they had 3 aircraft flying fitted with ejection seats, 2 of which entered operational service.

That Spitfire thing, was that the one about the girl who helped win the war because she determined that 8 machines guns were better than 4. I avoided watching that because i know i would have launched somthing at the tele.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    May 2020
  • From: North East of England
Posted by Hutch6390 on Saturday, September 5, 2020 7:07 PM

Can't remember which channel or who made it, these are usually shown on some satellite channels day & night.  Shame the item about MTBs was a news article, I'm sorry I missed it! And yes, those King Tigers look familiar.

Bish
That Spitfire thing, was that the one about the girl who helped win the war because she determined that 8 machines guns were better than 4. I avoided watching that because i know i would have launched somthing at the tele.

I think I saw the Spitfire one you mentioned, don't remember if it was the same one,  I do remember cringing at the idea of a leading aircraft designer being guided by his schoolgirl daughter!

And poor old Barham, she gets sunk on just about every doc about WWII at sea, or about battleships.

Vell, Zaphod's just zis guy, you know?

   

TakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakka

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Saturday, September 5, 2020 7:27 PM

I will bet that the Spitfire story failed to mention that more Spits were shot down during the BoB by 109's than the other way round. Or that the Germans had already dertermined that fewer large calibre cannon were better than smaller calibre MG's. Which is proven by the fact that the Spitfire later had its armament reduced from 8 MG's to 4 MG's and 2 20mm cannon.

The BBC does love its Spitfires.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    May 2020
  • From: North East of England
Posted by Hutch6390 on Saturday, September 5, 2020 7:41 PM

Bish
I will bet that the Spitfire story failed to mention that more Spits were shot down during the BoB by 109's than the other way round. Or that the Germans had already dertermined that fewer large calibre cannon were better than smaller calibre MG's. Which is proven by the fact that the Spitfire later had its armament reduced from 8 MG's to 4 MG's and 2 20mm cannon.

No, I didn't know about those BoB stats- really interesting!  I did see (yet another documentary) an interview with a 109 pilot who was there, he said the extra punch from the cannons was good, but the relatively slow rate of fire meant that he & his mates often missed RAF fighters because they crossed the line of fire in between rounds, in a turning fight - he seemed a bit annoyed about it!  That might be why the RAF opted for (edit: initially) 4 cannon instead of 2.  The .303 was an excellent rifle round, devastating to human targets, but not really up to knocking down machines.

Vell, Zaphod's just zis guy, you know?

   

TakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakka

 

  • Member since
    August 2020
  • From: Lakes Entrance, Victoria, Australia.
Posted by Dodgy on Sunday, September 6, 2020 2:07 AM

Hi Hutch. I know what you're saying about doco's, but you mentioned the footage of the King Tigers and I thought you might be interested in the following. The unit is 3./s.Pz.Abt.503 and the officer is Oberleutnant Richard Freiherr von Rosen. The film is from a 1944 Wochenschau propaganda newsreel. He served in Panzer III's, Tigers and King Tigers on both Eastern and Western fronts. He also served in the post WWII German army.

How do I know all this? I subscribe to an excellent U.K. magazine called Iron Cross in which they printed an interview with him.

I long to live in a world where chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Western North Carolina
Posted by Tojo72 on Sunday, September 6, 2020 1:04 PM
Standard operating procedures for war documentaries, cant remember how many times you see the same stock footage used to describe every action.Pacific War in Color does a lot of that,sometimes gets so aggravating I got yo turn them off.

  • Member since
    May 2020
  • From: North East of England
Posted by Hutch6390 on Sunday, September 6, 2020 1:24 PM

Dodgy
The unit is 3./s.Pz.Abt.503 and the officer is Oberleutnant Richard Freiherr von Rosen. The film is from a 1944 Wochenschau propaganda newsreel. He served in Panzer III's, Tigers and King Tigers on both Eastern and Western fronts. He also served in the post WWII German army.

Thanks, Dodgy - excellent info!  

Vell, Zaphod's just zis guy, you know?

   

TakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakka

 

  • Member since
    May 2020
  • From: North East of England
Posted by Hutch6390 on Sunday, September 6, 2020 1:36 PM

Tojo72
sometimes gets so aggravating I got yo turn them off

Yes, I've done that once or twice, too.  Another thing I've noticed is the practice of using the same sequence more than once in the same programme, but trying to fool people by playing the images reversed!  I've seen quite a few Lee/Grant tanks with left-hand gun sponsons, and a few aircraft codes with backward lettering.  I suppose at least they're making an effortHmm

Vell, Zaphod's just zis guy, you know?

   

TakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakka

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.