SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Hobbyboss 1/48 F-105G

15011 views
31 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Hobbyboss 1/48 F-105G
Posted by chris hall on Saturday, February 21, 2009 11:30 AM

Just off the production line. Very large, excellent fit, lots of good detail. similar accuracy issues to the Trumpeter 1/32 kit (no surprise there).

Plan view -I may have overdone the weathering:

Underside view - good selection of underwing stores, but main gear legs are fragile and not very positively attached.

Front 3/4 view. The yellow canopy surrounds are decals - tricky to position.

Nose close-up. Radome is removeable, Vulcan cannon and IFR probe are tricky to assemble, but worth the effort.

Arguably, the kit's weakest point is the cockpit. Seats are undersize and bear little resemblance to the real thing, tub is too narrow. Probably a better starting point for an accurate 1/48 Thud than the Monogram kit, though - most of the things that are wrong with the Hobbyboss kit are easier to fix or ignore than most of the things that are wrong with the Monogram kit. Half as expensive again as the Monogram kit, though. When we get a resin cockpit tub and seats, it will be worth posing the canopies open.

Comments and queries, as ever, welcome.

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Bicester, England
Posted by KJ200 on Saturday, February 21, 2009 11:37 AM

Chris, nice looking build.

Love the SEA camo scheme really suits these birds.

Just a suggestion based upon your comment, are you able to tone down the weathering with a light overspray of Buff?

Karl

Currently on the bench: AZ Models 1/72 Mig 17PF

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Naples, FL
Posted by tempestjohnny on Saturday, February 21, 2009 11:41 AM
Chris I still like it.  And I'm pretty sure that the Thud's took a waether beating in SE Asia

 

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Neenah, WI
Posted by HawkeyeHobbies on Saturday, February 21, 2009 12:18 PM
You're right considering the contrast between the yellow on the canopy and the rest of the aircraft. If you could tone down or fade the yellow...it'd be better. But it's a Thud there is never too much weathering, especially those flying in SEA...they were beat hard by both the missions and their environment.

Gerald "Hawkeye" Voigt

http://hawkeyes-squawkbox.com/

 

 

"Its not the workbench that makes the model, it is the modeler at the workbench."

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Saturday, February 21, 2009 1:10 PM
 KJ200 wrote:

Chris, nice looking build.

Love the SEA camo scheme really suits these birds.

Just a suggestion based upon your comment, are you able to tone down the weathering with a light overspray of Buff?

Karl

Worth thinking about, Karl, but I don't really want to have to mask the transparencies and other non-camo aresa, especially after they've been decalled. Might try a light dry-brushing of the base SEA tan, to reduce the contrast.

Cheers,

Chris. 

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Saturday, February 21, 2009 1:20 PM

 HawkeyeHobbies wrote:
You're right considering the contrast between the yellow on the canopy and the rest of the aircraft. If you could tone down or fade the yellow...[snip]

Gerald, I take your point entirely about the yellow sealant strips. However, this is a review build, and I thought it important to show the readers what they would be getting in the box, bright yellow, over-thick, sealant strips and all.

If I were building it for myself, I'd be brush-painting much thinner strips in a more creamy sort of yellow.

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    February 2009
  • From: Carlsbad
Posted by JWalker on Saturday, February 21, 2009 1:32 PM
The weathering IMO looks consistant with film footage Ive seen of Thuds from that era. Its a great build! I need some Century series fighters in my collection.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Saturday, February 21, 2009 1:52 PM

I've just dry-brushed the tan camo areas with the base colour. Although the contrast is still there, it's much reduced, and, I think, looks better. The overall tan shade is also lighter, because the dry-brushed tan hasn't been darkened by four coats of Future and three coats of matt varnish.

I'll post new piccies tomorrow, when I can take piccies in daylight. Flash photography always seems to exaggerate shading effects.

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: South Central Wisconsin
Posted by Daywalker on Saturday, February 21, 2009 2:45 PM
Chris- Nicely done!  Too bad about the interior, never could understand how some manufacturers can be so off with some details, yet spot on with others.  Looking forward to the updated pics, even as she sits in the first set she's a mighty fine representation of an operational Thud. Thumbs Up [tup]

Frank 

 

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Bournemouth UK
Posted by Luftwoller on Saturday, February 21, 2009 4:58 PM

Very nice work Chris. Another beauty for our viewing pleasure.

...Guy

..'Your an embarrassment to the human genus, makes me ashamed to call myself Homo'.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Sunday, February 22, 2009 6:16 AM

Hi guys,

here are some more piccies I took outdoors this morning, outside in daylight. any improvement?

Cheers,

Chris.

 

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: A Spartan in the Wolverine State
Posted by rjkplasticmod on Sunday, February 22, 2009 8:18 AM

Looks great from here Chris.  Nice build Thumbs Up [tup].

Regards,  Rick

RICK At My Age, I've Seen It All, Done It All, But I Don't Remember It All...
  • Member since
    January 2003
Posted by el_jere on Sunday, February 22, 2009 8:25 AM
 rjkplasticmod wrote:

Looks great from here Chris.  Nice build Thumbs Up [tup].

Regards,  Rick

Sign - Ditto [#ditto] I think too it looks great, like the cammo job!

It mustt be a big bird in 1/48 right?

best regards

Jeremias

Res non verba

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Sunday, February 22, 2009 9:43 AM

 el_jere wrote:

[snip]

It mustt be a big bird in 1/48 right?

[snip]

Certainly is. The Thud was not a small aeroplane. Over 440mm long in 1/48. Think in terms of almost 2 1/2 Spitfires or P-51s.

Here's the model after receiving its first primer coat:

Not yet fitted with nose cone and airbrakes. Note the Badger 150 airbrush, q-tip and supermarket milk container top for scale.

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Peru, IN
Posted by leadsled on Sunday, February 22, 2009 11:11 AM
Beautiful ThudThumbs Up [tup] I've always loved the Thud. Nice job over all. Thanks for sharing.
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Monday, February 23, 2009 7:29 PM

 Looks pretty dang-darn realistic.

...The mighty Thunderchief! The triple threat:

They can BOMB you they can SHOOT you or they can FALL on you!

Well done model there. Your weathering is purrrfect!

Didya know it still holds the speed record for single engined, single seat, under 15,000 ft? That sucker, moves!

  • Member since
    January 2014
Posted by Silver on Friday, January 10, 2014 10:09 PM
Good job
  • Member since
    January 2014
Posted by Silver on Friday, January 10, 2014 10:10 PM
I am soon doing a cut-away version to that model.
  • Member since
    September 2013
Posted by Dean30 on Saturday, January 11, 2014 12:59 PM

I have his kit and intend to build it in February, do you recommend any after market stuff? I am assuming the seats, but the cockpit too?

  • Member since
    January 2014
Posted by Silver on Friday, January 17, 2014 1:38 PM
I know it's an old post but if anyone does read this it would be good to take note.The so call " Yellow" stripe/tape on the front canopy of the F-105 is actually from the inside and in due time fades away to a light lime green.I flown the F-105 d back in 1972 then converted to F-4E's.
  • Member since
    September 2013
Posted by Dean30 on Friday, January 17, 2014 4:58 PM

Wow Silver you flew these? That's incredible! How long would the yellow stay yellow?

  • Member since
    September 2013
Posted by Dean30 on Friday, January 17, 2014 4:59 PM

Also what did you prefer to fly? F-4 or F-105?

  • Member since
    January 2014
Posted by Silver on Friday, January 17, 2014 7:10 PM
In a dogfight I can eat an f-4 for lunch.An f-4 for two engines went only a50 knots faster below 25,00ft.Having flown both ,I prefer the F-105d.The F-4 had longer rang and at the time new electronics and avionics.Lots of people don't know that the f-105 dogfights with migs with Bombs on its wings.Very good aircraft.As the f-4,it was a good Bomber and a Gem.Also the yellow stripe lasted about three months.
  • Member since
    January 2014
Posted by Silver on Friday, January 17, 2014 7:11 PM
Excuse my spelling.Typing fast.
  • Member since
    January 2014
Posted by Silver on Friday, January 17, 2014 7:21 PM
Before the F-105 I flew the F-100c for a year.Thats why I fell in love with Metal Finish.All three aircraft were great.I will be building them until I run out of room.The Monogram models of the three aircraft mentioned are the most accurate .
  • Member since
    January 2014
Posted by Silver on Friday, January 17, 2014 11:38 PM
After market is good but it depends how much you intend to.The cutaway version that I am doing in 1/48 scale Hobbyboss will require lots of detail.An out of the box is good and just replace the seat harnesses.In 72nd it's large enough to detail.Its a big Bird in real life.One time I fell from one and broke my left elbow and sprained my hip.Took me out of six missions.For contest reasons detail the hell out of it just don't add jet fuel.Ha!
  • Member since
    January 2014
Posted by Silver on Friday, January 17, 2014 11:39 PM
Good luck.
  • Member since
    September 2013
Posted by Dean30 on Saturday, January 18, 2014 1:54 PM

Lol, thanks Silver wow that's incredible The F-100 was one I remember as a kid being one of my favourites, it's cool to hear first hand accounts did you ever have any photo's of your planes? The F-105G I have is hopefully going to be made as accurately as I can, with the exception of decals and the occasional seat I have never bought any other resin parts so I'm a novice with that type. The decals for the windows have given me some thought, I think I will mask and paint the inside sealant in the lime green rather than use the yellow, but having said that I could do a relatively new aircraft. Hmm I usually weather them, I'll be making it next month so I'll decide before then.

  • Member since
    January 2014
Posted by Silver on Tuesday, January 21, 2014 1:49 AM
Sorry I forgot to mention that I went from the F-105d to the G then to the F-4E.Wow , I am getting to old.
  • Member since
    January 2014
Posted by Silver on Tuesday, January 21, 2014 2:08 AM
My aircraft --F-105G--561st Tac Fighter Sqdn -the 388th Tac FTR Wing.Serial No.-64-8322 .-- WW top 322 bottom on tail.SEA CAMO.The No 64 was 63 .Korat.Lucky man you got it right you made the mig killer .the pilot was w/ me on only one flight and I am still trying to remember him.
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.