SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

f86, to show or not to show

994 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: USA
f86, to show or not to show
Posted by nsclcctl on Friday, January 23, 2004 7:38 AM
There is an option posed with the academy F86 mig killer in 1:48. One can build it as normal or you can build it to show the engine. The model sits in 2 essentially with the back part of the fuselage on a yellow cart. The jet engine, painted nicely could be shown, and it is a very large engine as you can imagine. There is so much detail in the engine, it is a shame to hide it. However, I am not sure I want to do it that way. What does everyone think who has built this. I am curious.

Thanks, To show or not to show, that is the question.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Harrisburg, PA
Posted by Lufbery on Friday, January 23, 2004 7:45 AM
Do two: one opened, one closed. :D

Regards,

-Drew

-Drew

Build what you like; like what you build.

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: plopped down in front of this computer.
Posted by eagle334 on Friday, January 23, 2004 8:14 AM
For me, I like them all in one piece. An airplane just doesn't look right in a couple of pieces, unless it is in a diorama to give some kind of story to why its in two pieces. I also don't like them with wings folded unless in a diorama for the same reason. But thats what great about the hobby, you can build it however YOU want.Smile [:)]
Wayners Go Eagles! 334th Fighter Squadron Me and my F-4E <script language="javascript" src="http://www.airfighters.com/phgid_183.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Panama City, Florida, Hurricane Alley
Posted by berny13 on Friday, January 23, 2004 8:50 AM
The first one I built, I closed it up. On the second one, I opened it up. That was a mistake. The aft section has very little detail inside and will have to be added. Any picture showing the aft section removed also shows jacks under the wings and center fuselage section to level the aircraft. These will have to be scratch built. I also plan to show the guns removed and positioned on a work bench, as if they were being reconditioned. I started this project almost two years ago and still haven't finished it.

It is on my list of things to finish, which keeps getting longer and longer.

Berny

 Phormer Phantom Phixer

On the bench

TF-102A Delta Dagger, 32nd FIS, 54-1370, 1/48 scale. Monogram Pro Modeler with C&H conversion.  

Revell F-4E Phantom II 33rd TFW, 58th TFS, 69-260, 1/32 scale. 

Tamiya F-4D Phantom II, 13th TFS, 66-8711, 1/32 scale.  F-4 Phantom Group Build. 

 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by nsclcctl on Friday, January 23, 2004 8:53 AM
OK, this helps, I'm leaning toward closed.
The model does suggest a 15 gram weight in the nose, what do people use as a weight and how?
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 23, 2004 8:54 AM
I did a Mig 15 like that. I did up the engine but attched the tail section with a bit of white glue so I could hang it. Just in case some day I run out of celling space it will look good on a shelf with the engine exposed.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Manila, Philippines
Posted by shrikes on Friday, January 23, 2004 12:04 PM
I used a fishing sinker weight for mine.... of course i went at it with a hammer first. Smile [:)] I stuck it forward of the instrument panel with some double sided mounting tape and did the edges with CA glue, just to be sure.
Blackadder: This plan's as cunning as a fox that used to be Professor of cunning at Oxford University but has now moved on and is working with the U.N at the high commission of cunning planning
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 23, 2004 9:46 PM
I have pictures of RCAF sabres undergoing maintenance on the ramps in Germany with the fuselage rear on a dolly, no extra jacks in use (although they may have been taken away after the fuse was separated.

If I ever build a Sabre I'd probably do it separated in a diorame, to represent the one we worked on for an aviation museum.
Regards,
Bruce
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Canada / Czech Republic
Posted by upnorth on Saturday, January 24, 2004 1:14 PM
If the engine has that much detail, its practically a seperate model in itself.

I'd make the plane in one piece and scratchbuild an engine stand, display the engine beside the plane on a tarmac diorama base and scratchbuild a tailpipe section to fit in the back end of the plane to make it look like an engine is in there. It may not be totally realistic, but at least you won't be making a sacrifice between plane and engine when it comes to displaying them.

I knew someone who had a similar dilema with one of the ICM 1/48 Spitfires. They have beautiful engines that are almost kits in themselves. He built the Spit with all the service panels in place over the ngine compartment and stuck the pipes into place where you'd expect to see them if the engine was in place. He build an engine stand and placed the completed engine with some aftermarket exhausts on it, beside the Spit.

Its one way around the dilema.
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.