SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

WHATS THE SCOOP

3625 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: t.r.f. mn.
WHATS THE SCOOP
Posted by detailfreak on Saturday, February 9, 2013 9:17 AM

OK ,I just scored a 1/72 kit of the X/YB-35 flying wing,anyone tell anything about it ?

[View:http://s172.photobucket.com/albums/w1/g-earl828/]  http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t104/cycledupes/1000Roadwheels4BuildBadge.jpg

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Cat Central, NC
Posted by Bronto on Saturday, February 9, 2013 11:29 AM

It is probably the re-release of the AMT kit.  Fit of the parts are terrible. You will find major seams to fill with the intakes and the exhaust areas.  Don't forget to add weight so it will sit on the nose gear.  With some work, it can look impressive when finished.

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: Berwick, La.
Posted by Tnonk on Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:19 PM

I have a copy of 'Military Model Preview' Vol. 3.03 from 1995 with the write up on the AMT kit.

Let me know if you want a copy & I can scan & email it to you.

Adrian

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: t.r.f. mn.
Posted by detailfreak on Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:40 PM

Bronto,this is the AMT kit.

Tnonk,that would be cool. Many thanks in advance.

[View:http://s172.photobucket.com/albums/w1/g-earl828/]  http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t104/cycledupes/1000Roadwheels4BuildBadge.jpg

  • Member since
    May 2011
  • From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posted by Real G on Saturday, February 9, 2013 7:13 PM

I have the ERTL XB-35 and the Italeri rebox of the YB-49.  The ERTL decals are thick, glossy, and utter crap.  The Italeri decals are nicer, but matte in finish.  The basic airfames are a better starting point for an awesome looking model compared to a vac-form, but the Devil is in the details, and he is obviously not anywhere near the kits!  The leading edge intakes should be deep and lead to the engines, not blanked off with phony screens.  The tires don't have good tread detail, the nose gear bay is too small (there is a large door that is normally closed, and opens and shuts only when the gear cycles) - ERTL only molded the well where the open gear strut door fits.  There are a bunch of subtle differences in all the prototypes in the canopy, armament, and antennas.  And the small details are blah looking.  The cockpit captures the major features of the real thing, but again lacks fine details like instruments and proper throttle/mixture levers.  (And oscillating fans!)  And as others have mentioned, fit is not very good between the major parts.  The problem is compounded by the fact that all the prototypes were silver/NMF.  Still, they are the only injection molded kits of Jack Northrop's amazing flying wing in 1/72 scale.

Execuform had a vac-form kit with some pretty comprehensive instructions that covered the XB-35, YB-35, YB-49 and YRB-49.  I've got one in the stash, so PM me if you need some information.  And if anyone wants the parts to do the YRB-49, you are welcome to the parts in my kit.  (Although I have no idea why anyone would want to go to the trouble of building the least attractive variant.)

What kind of suprised me is that there was absolutely no aftermarket ever made for these kits.  Even Eduard never made a cockpit PE set.  The kit could use internal/external PE, resin tires and "Seamless Sucker" type inlets with resin or PE vanes,  vac form clear parts (the canopy configuration has several variations, and the rear blister did not always have the sighting post aperture), and a nice silkscreened decal sheet.  And maybe some Quickboost resin propellers, as cleaning up the spinner collars is a pain.

Sorry, that's a lot of negative whining on my part, but the XB-35/YB-49 sereis of aircraft were among my favorite aircraft.  But if you just take your time and build it OOTB and get a decent silver/NMF finish, it will look stunning.

“Ya ya ya, unicorn papoi!”

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Washington, DC
Posted by TomZ2 on Saturday, February 9, 2013 7:57 PM

Google !!!





Tags: Flying wing

Occasional factual, grammatical, or spelling variations are inherent to this thesis and should not be considered as defects, as they enhance the individuality and character of this document.

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: Berwick, La.
Posted by Tnonk on Saturday, February 9, 2013 8:04 PM

Greg,

Your scans are on the way.

Let me know if you have any trouble with them.

Adrian

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.