Spitfire landing gear brake lines question - resolved

here are some picts showing  the line some claim to be a brake line. I do not think it is a brake line but I have no proof of it. This picture does not show a rear side of thestrut, where the real brake line is located.

 Any odea what this line is for ??

 - locking rod ?? 

Here is the best I could come up with.

http://www.aircraftresourcecenter.com/index2.html

It look's like the brake line is on the back side of the wheel door.

EDIT....The link doesnt work properly for what I wanted it to show

Go to walkarounds on top, then propeller walkarounds, scroll down to spitfire "spitfire MK XVI including engine photos". It's 3rd from the bottom in the spitfire section. There's a pic of the right main leg where you can clearly see the brake line on the wheel door. It's the best pic I could find that actually shows it. Sorry I couldnt get direct link.

thanks. It is almost right . Unfortunetely it is a rebuilt Spit and this line is not an original setting - unless you meant a diferent picture than shown.

Kagero Top Shots shows this picture of a Landing Gear

and here the brake line is clearly visible and also shows the eng of the line in question. What is the other line ?? 

I'm not a big fan of using restored items as reference because I've seen too many that do not match what they looked like back in the day. Heres a pic of the spitfire I did a walk around. it's from the USAF museum.

Thanks Stan ! You are absolutely right. Referenced restored aircraft may be tricky .

In the meantime I think I resolved the issue with Spit langind gear.

The "line" shown on the picture above is in fact a locking rod, some kind of safety mechanism for the shock absorber. The brake line always was placed at the rear edge of the cover coming down to the wheel with a flexible (black) hose.

If anyone has more to add into it I appreciate your input.

BTW: I found one book where the locking rod is called a "brake line", so be careful with the resource books as well and always recheck references  

No, I think the picture you found  is wrong. The line shown there is placed on the inside surface of the cover (not at the edge) and it is made out of a single (probobly) flexible hose. In fact the original part was a steel pipe attached to the cover and connected with a wheel with a short flexible hose (black). The cover had some kind of undercut where the line was sitting safely attached with set of fasteners. If you compare the two picutrs you will see the diference in location.

It's a locking rod, which stops the leg being dismantled, until the oil filler plug has been removed, thereby releasing the internal oil pressure.

Edgar

and here is the result:

Now, I guess, I'm going to ruin it, for you, sorry.  The torque-link (then known as torsion link) u/c wasn't introduced, on the IX, XI, XII & XIII, until September 1945, even though it was proposed in December, 1942.  The VII & VIII had them from June, 1944.

Edgar

You're obviously a legs man Greg. A selection of the best WW II Spitfire soft porn.

WOW ! Antoni thanks for such great reference pictures !

Do you have any additional info on what each of them is from ? Specially this one with a bomb  

Żulikowski's BS456 UZ.Ż Autumn 1942 I think.

BS556 RF-G

Gabszewicz's EN526 SZ-G

Unknown, probably taken during Warsaw Uprising Aug-Oct 1944.

BS556 RF-G again.

gzt wrote:

was afraid of this . So to make sure: previous versions had the locking rod streight ?

No; what I meant, by "torsion links," is the pair of triangles, sticking out in front of the leg, over the oleo.  They weren't there until post-war.

Edgar

Ohh, OK, I got it. This is not a big deal, I can remove them in no time .

My concern was focus on the locking rod. I saw a diferent configuration of this rod. Could you share your knowledge on this one also ?

Not so much knowledge, more like an inspired guess, really.  The u/c legs changed, during the Spitfire's life.  On the III, the legs were raked forward 2", and this was continued on, to the VC, etc., but not the VA & VB.  Much later the tracking was changed, so that the wheels were straight, fore and aft, instead of slightly splayed.  This was due to the metalled runways, rather than just grass, and Seafires would have been the same.  Any one of those changes could change the configuration of the locking wire, as could a different manufacturer; it needs to be remembered that Spitfire parts production was spread all over the country.

Edgar

thanks Edgar for your input !!

I corrected u/c according to your comments