There you only have a 5% difference.
Model railroad scale is confusing, because there are both scale which is the math for the difference in size from reality, and gauge, which is the width between the rails.
And the terms get used indiscriminately sometimes.
Just to give one example. N scale is defined as 1:160. That is because the original manufacturer Arnold used track with a nine mm gauge (0.354 inches), hence the "N", to represent Standard gauge track, which is 4'-8 1/2". Rather arcane on many levels.
And in Britain N scale is 1:148 but that's a unique thing.
Military 1:144 use N scale stuff a lot.
But, N gauge track is used in other scales. For instance Nn3 scale is based on a three foot gauge, so the track sets the scale at 1:102. However in the interests of available accessories, Nn3 models use 1:87 scale (HO) scenery and rolling stock, with the wheel base built at .354 inches. That makes the track gauge scale at 30 inches. And if you are a Nn2 1/2 modeler replicating 2'-6" gauge, it's pretty perfect.
It gets worse, for instance HO (half O) scale is 1:87, although O scale is 1:48.
I generally find scale difference works to about 10% maximum. With three dimensional objects the rule of cubes gets you. thatextra 10% in three directions compounds to a 33% increase in volume and it looks way too big if set right next to true scale.
Reducing scale works great in shadow boxes and dioramas that have a fixed view angle.
Having Z scale 1:220 folks in the background of N scale has a great effect.