fritzthefox
seems to have a few inexplicable quirks which I can only assume were the result of a committee design decision.
You have hit upon one of the continuing bugabears in the scale ship modeling world.
Sone of the OOB instructions leave you with configurations really much to like having all a/c accesses open, but also wheels-up-in-flight as well. (Sail angle and which sails are used is a another rant, entire.)
Another issue that virtually every manufacturer is guilty of is boxing the same kit with different names on the box, sometimes without even bothering to have even a quarter-sprue of differing details. This winds up as egregious as boing a Hurricane and calling it a Spitfire and a Typhoon. To only as bad as kitting up an M4A1 and boxing as every vcariant (including Ram and Grizzly).
This gets deep pretty quick.And, it's once again, one more reason that research is as important as the kit quality. The Britsh built around 4 and 50 "74s" and captured and converted a dozen or so. They razeed some three deckers, too, perhaps 20 (perhaps). So, the 74 counts as one of the few sailing man-of-warships that was built to a "class." Except that they really weren't. The genral particulars were mandated, but each shipyard and shipwright did it their way.
The same yard and wright did not produce Constitution, Constellation, or President--yet, the kist of those are virtually identical (and Constellation has its own debates).
Now, down about 1/350 scale, this could be more forgiven, where differnces of several feet are measured in the hundreths and thousandths (12" at 1/350 is 0.034").
Even in steel ships we see this, and despite having more accurate records (or even specific, preserved, ships) for refernce.