SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Scan Resolution : What is Good Enough?

2337 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
Scan Resolution : What is Good Enough?
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 12:55 PM

I was just scanning some old Monogram Albatross decals - just in case the decals fail on application and I need to print a new set.

The 2400 dpi , of course, produces the best image and forestalls rastering quite a bit.

My question is:

what scan resolution is most practical for printing onto decal paper? 

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Thursday, December 31, 2015 9:31 AM

I typically use 600, but have gone to 800 or even 1200 with highly detailed decals for smaller scales.

Also, when scanning decals for resizing for smaller scales, set ppi appropriately when resizing.

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Thursday, December 31, 2015 9:33 AM

Thanks for the info, Don ! Big Smile

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • From: Indiana, USA
Posted by Greg on Thursday, December 31, 2015 9:57 AM

Since this is something done only occassionally, I'm just curious why one wouldn't want to use the highest resolution avialable to retain as much IQ as possible?

This isn't a suggestion, it is a question.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Friday, January 1, 2016 10:19 AM

Greg

Since this is something done only occassionally, I'm just curious why one wouldn't want to use the highest resolution avialable to retain as much IQ as possible?

This isn't a suggestion, it is a question.

 

File size.  My computer isn't a world beating gamer machine, and if the file size gets too large, it really bogs down during editing, especially if I am using "layers."  My drives are now big enough I don't worry about having room for big files, but the time problem still affects me.

 

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Friday, January 1, 2016 12:17 PM

I don't have a problem yet with file size as I built a new computer for running 64 bit 3D Modeling software:

4 GHz i7 CPU , 32 GB RAM , NVIDIA 4GB Video RAM.

I presume the extra resolution gained in a high resolution scan would be lost in the translation when output is sent to any printer other than those meant to print large, high quality photos.Hmm

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Saturday, January 2, 2016 9:14 AM

Sprue-ce Goose

 

I presume the extra resolution gained in a high resolution scan would be lost in the translation when output is sent to any printer other than those meant to print large, high quality photos.Hmm

 

True.  The ppi specs on printers are readily available, however, so you can see which printers might work better with the higher res scans.

 

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Saturday, January 2, 2016 10:58 AM

Thanks again, Don.

I'll most likely follow your example and check the specs on photo printers and the type of ink they use.

Then I can print photos larger than the 3x5 inch as well as decals.

  • Member since
    August 2012
Posted by JMorgan on Tuesday, January 26, 2016 4:57 PM

This is a bit off the subject but I remember you use Paintshop Pro. Do you print decals as a raster file? Wouldn't they print better as a vector file if converted?

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Wednesday, January 27, 2016 9:11 AM

Vector vs Raster doesn't really affect resolution all that much.  It depends on the source of your art work. If you are doing the graphics from scratch, vector may be a bit more consistant.  But if you are doing work based on photo originals, it would start as a raster and I don't see a good reason to convert.

Also, on some original artwork, staying raster gives me some extra options in applying effects.  PSP does allow mixed files, some vector layers and some raster layers.

In any case, vector files get converted to raster when printing- that is, the printer driver works with raster.  A plotter is needed to actually print vector as vector.

 

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    August 2012
Posted by JMorgan on Wednesday, January 27, 2016 6:33 PM

That's good to know. Thanks.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.