Cobrahistorian wrote: |
I've heard two separate references as to what exactly is the "daisy cutter". AF types tend to refer to the fuse extender as a "Daisy Cutter" because it looks like a weed whacker. I have also heard the BLU-82 referred to as the same. I made reference to it once and was corrected by the former Air Force officer I was speaking to. They referred to it as "Big Blue" (from the bomb's designation BLU-82). I don't know if the Army referred to it as such. I'll have to do some digging on that. SFC, don't worry, we've still got Hueys flying here, although their days are numbered now that the UH-72 is coming in. I've put in for the Huey course 3 times and keep getting denied. I love the Apache, but the Huey IS history... Oh well... maybe I can con some right seat time.... Jon |
|
If I recall correctly, the fuse extender is what makes it a daisy cutter. The extender causes the bomb to explode right at ground level. The blast and shrapnel levels everything within a large radius, creating a large level opening in the jungle, ergo daisy cutter. Without the fuse extender, it would burrow into the ground as it was exploding, creating more of a crater than a clearing.
I miss the Huey too. In the early part of my career they were ubiquitous - there were so many around everybody who wanted one had one. Some of my most remembered flights are sitting on the side of a Huey, legs out in the breeze, whop-whopping along at 120 kts. When I started in flight test, we had a UH-1M as an ash-and-trash bird. Used it for chase, hauling supplies to the test site, etc. Wonderful aircraft - UH-1C (B?) fuselage, AH-1G dynamics, cruised at 140 kts. We called it the hotrod Huey.
As for the UH-72, I wonder how long it will be before those high-time NG aviators figure out that it's capable of aerobatics? That rigid rotor system will easily pull it through loops and rolls.
Dan H.
On the bench:
Not much right now, just getting started again.