SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Build the aircraft armed and tanked or not?

7328 views
31 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Wednesday, January 15, 2014 8:06 PM

Well they don't land armed, so there's no reason to arm them until they are ready to go.

That's how I do it too, looks cool and I hate not using parts I paid for...

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    August 2012
Posted by JimNTENN on Wednesday, January 15, 2014 8:02 PM

I prefer to build them with all that extra baggage because it just makes the subject that much more interesting in my opinion.

Current project(s): Hobby Boss: 1/72 F9F-2 Panther

                                  Midwest Products: Skiff(wood model)

                                  

  • Member since
    December 2013
Build the aircraft armed and tanked or not?
Posted by beeryboats on Wednesday, January 15, 2014 7:51 PM

First off, total newby here. As a kid I would build a kit, no matter which one, totally armed and tanked to the gills. During WWII I would think some aircraft would always be armed? Maybe not. But most modern jets these days would be usually seen with empty pylons wouldn't they? I guess our modeling is like taking a 3-D scale photo of an aircraft at any given time so anything goes. Maybe some Vets would chime in here. Would an aircraft be sitting on the ramp armed to the teeth with engine plugs and pitot covers on? Or bombed up with an engine cover off?

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.