SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Endgame 1946 GB - 1/1/09-12/31/09

72394 views
306 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Sandusky Ohio, USA
Posted by Swanny on Monday, January 26, 2009 12:17 PM
Deep into PSR right now (putty-sand-repeat) and still have at least one or two more rounds before I get the finish I'm looking for but it is coming along.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Algonquin, IL
Posted by model geek on Friday, January 23, 2009 12:17 PM

Matt,

Lookin good so farThumbs Up [tup] Can't wait to see some paint on there!

Tom  

 

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Sandusky Ohio, USA
Posted by Swanny on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:27 PM
LOL, that's cause you only get to see the done picture.
  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:27 PM
Very nice Matt! It seems to be fitting together without many problems.
The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Sandusky Ohio, USA
Posted by Swanny on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 8:41 PM

It took a fair amount of Milliput to fair in the tail section and the edges of the new landing gear bay.

After some considerable test fitting and sanding the first engine pod is attached, still need some fine fill along the seam to repair some chips that were there right out of the box. Fortunately the other engine pod does not have the same chipping.

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 6:15 PM
No problem Russ. Glad to be of help. A thing to remember though. Infrared is an "Active" night-vision when the current ambient light NVDs are "Passive". A very bright light will blackout a "Passive" NVD and possibly momentarily blind the user, especially the early stuff. I am not real certain about infrared. My understanding about it is that all light has infrared in it. The IR lamps only projected infrared light which, of course, is invisible. A regular light would enhance the image, but I think that a light above a certain brightness would burn out the IR detector or something in the IR device. Definitely do some more research. Another possibility would be to mount a "white" light and then mount just a IR scope for the commander. The commander would look through the scope, and if any German's had an IR lamp on which would be very noticable(one major minus with IR gear and the reason no modern military uses it), the commander could direct the gunner, "light up" the target, and destroy it.I also saw some were that the US put some IR gear on either Pershings or Pattons I think under a project named "Leaflet II". Might be able to find something out about that.
The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Dripping Springs, TX, USA
Posted by RBaer on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 5:24 PM

Brendan, thanks for the pics. That's kind of what I had in mind for a "white" light. I was mainly curious if the brightness of a white light pointed at an IR setup would "blind" the IR gear. The sniper scopes were "low-light" setups that would definitely be disabled if hit with bright light, possibly blinding the user as well....

I may see if I can hunt up a pic or two of early US IR gear.....that would be a nice twist. Otherwise I think I'll do a regular "white" light similar to that used in Korea.

Apprentice rivet counter.

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:53 PM

Sounds good JMart. I have changed your build to the Ausf. G. And thanks for the little history about the steel wheeled Panthers. I thought a good many Ausf. G's had steel wheels. The IR gear and splinter camo sound cool too. I actually plan to put IR gear on my King Tiger II as well.

RBaer; Russ, the Marines actually put 18 inch GE spotlights on some M46 Pattons during Korea. It would be a good alternative to IR gear. Another thing to consider, with the Germans developing IR gear for their tanks, there would have been more German tanks on the prowl at night. The Army and Marines were starting to field their early IR scopes at the end of the war but I think they only saw use in the Pacific and later in Korea and Vietnam. These were called the Sniperscope and the Snooperscope. Now with the IR lamp provided, these were only effective to about 200 yards, maybe 300 yards max depending on conditions. But with a larger lamp of lets say 18 inch, the range would be better. It was reported that these devices significantly decreased the danger of Japanese infiltrators at night. The Russians also recieved some of these through the Lend-Lease program. If the threat of German tanks at night became great enough, I would think that the Americans and Russians would have adapted these systems to work on tanks as well. No doubt the M26 would have recieved this treatment. Either the spotlight or IR gear would look cool though. Here are some pics of the Pattons with the spotlight and some of the Sniperscope/Snooperscope.

This one shows the mounting brackets.

Sniperscope on M3 carbine:

Sniperscope on T3 carbine:

Snooperscope:

The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posted by deeve on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:43 PM

I have changed my mind.

 

I am no longer going to build this OOB.

 

I just ordered the Eduard photo etch set for this kit. First time that I will build something not OOB. :)

 

I will not be able to start this kit till I get the photo etched goodies. Unfortunately that won't be till next month.

Deeve

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Dripping Springs, TX, USA
Posted by RBaer on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:39 AM

"IR".......hmmm.....

Would a good counter to IR be a white light? Like a big, mantlet-mounted spot light?

Apprentice rivet counter.

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: NJ
Posted by JMart on Monday, January 19, 2009 8:28 PM

WarHammer25 - I want to change my build, if possible.  Panther As were still in use late in the war, but far and few in between. I also have a Tamiya 1/35 Panther G Steel Wheel version that fits the bill for "Endgame 46" much better.  Panther G was the last Panther model produced before the end of the war. Steel wheels were used sparingly in Panther G training units; steel wheels were planned for the never built Panther II. By end of the war, some Panther Gs had some steel wheels (instead of rubber rimmed wheels) due to lack of resources. Therefore, makes more sense to build a steel-wheel version of the Panther G as a "46" type of vehicle, a bridge to the planned Panther II. I will add some minor scratchbuild details to make it a very late Panther G version (like the mantle "neck" and maybe IR equipment). I am almost certain I will do splinter camo pattern, which was one of the last camo schemes devised.  Weathering will be light to moderate, as the tanks would be on the "newer" side of things.

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Monday, January 19, 2009 7:07 PM
Very good start Russ. Keep up the good work!
The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Dripping Springs, TX, USA
Posted by RBaer on Monday, January 19, 2009 12:03 PM

Progress! My M26 got started over the weekend, very basic stuff so far. I'm going for a "used" look with a relatively early build with the initial drivetrain improvements. This would be a post-Zebra Mission tank. My goal is to show it a little beat up, trimmed fenders, and lots of stowage.

The gray is Mr Surfacer 500, used to fill some seams and still show texture and cast surface. Not sure yet whether I'll try a winter finish or not. Also looking for the Friul tracks, as the kit tracks are well-detailed but a little loose, which will be visible without the skirts.

Apprentice rivet counter.

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 8:34 AM
Yes you can. The He-111 was used up until the end of the war and would have still been in use until enough Ar-234's were in service. What variant will you be building FeldMarSchall?
The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Cincinnati Ohio
Posted by DantheMan85 on Monday, January 12, 2009 9:33 PM

WarHammer, may I enter in this?

On my Work Bench: Tamiya Ford GT 1/24

Up Coming: ?

           

 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posted by deeve on Monday, January 12, 2009 1:11 PM

Sweet, I have this kit too.

 

I look foreward to your updates. I have read the information on Swanny's site about this kit and I'd love some more tips on this build.

 

 

Deeve

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Algonquin, IL
Posted by model geek on Sunday, January 11, 2009 10:18 PM

Thanks, I was looking at the kit this evening and came across an interesting feature. I was planning on leaving the engine access panels loose so they could be removed to view the engine which is decently detailed. I then noticed on the clear parts spure that clear panels are provided for that purpose.

Tom  

 

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Cincinnati Ohio
Posted by DantheMan85 on Sunday, January 11, 2009 7:59 PM

Well I've done some work on my Ju-88, the cockpit parts I have all ready from paint.  The cockpit has an overall dark gray color, I think I'm going with a Gray,Dark Green, Black Green overall color my Ju-88

On my Work Bench: Tamiya Ford GT 1/24

Up Coming: ?

           

 

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Sunday, January 11, 2009 7:33 PM

 Hellcat man wrote:
I haven't built Dragons but now that you mention it I think the LHS has it on saleWhistling [:-^]

I would get it. I am currently working on a M4A1 76mm for the Lend-Lease GB and it is awesome. I think that Dragon's Shermans are the best out there. I also have the M4A3E8 in the stash that looks equally as good and plan on getting the new Firefly when it comes out.

The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    November 2007
  • From: Toronto Ontario
Posted by Hellcat man on Sunday, January 11, 2009 7:11 PM
I haven't built Dragons but now that you mention it I think the LHS has it on saleWhistling [:-^]

 ALEX ZELYK

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Sunday, January 11, 2009 5:29 PM
Sweet kit! I have heard it is very nice. As for the WIP, it must be posted on this thread though you can have another thread somewhere else for it as well.
The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Algonquin, IL
Posted by model geek on Sunday, January 11, 2009 5:07 PM

Made a trip today to my LHS and picked up Tamiya's 1/48 Gloster Meteor F.1. Kit comes with a V-1 Buzz Bomb, Bonus!Big Smile [:D]

I'm going to order a Eduard PE detail set as well. I'm in the process of finishing my current build so I'm probably a couple of weeks away from starting on this one.

As I am new to the group builds should WIP for this kit be posted on this thread or should I just have a link to a separate thread in the aircraft forum?

Any advise appreciated.

Thanks!

Tom

Tom  

 

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Sunday, January 11, 2009 11:16 AM

I would personally start with a brown or tan base color then go with some other colors. Most late-war German tanks had a three color camo of some sort. But the E-25 never saw service so you could make up your own pattern. Then if you wanted to, you could add a whitewash type color for winter.

Here are some pictures of built E-25s I found and some E-100s that show different camo patterns:

http://www.militarymodelling.com/news/searchresult.asp
http://www.militarymodelling.com/news/searchresult.asp

The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by Sdkfz 251 on Sunday, January 11, 2009 9:01 AM
what camo should i put on my E-25, Brown or white based?

If your going through hell, keep going. On bench: Cf-100 Canuck 80% E-25 75% -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Off bench: F7F Tigercat Bf 109 G

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Saturday, January 10, 2009 10:31 AM
 MarkDunck wrote:

Put me down for either a:

Late M.A.N. Panther Ausf. G, kinda a what if as it will have IR equipment on it.

Or a PanzerJäger Triebwagen (Possibly a complete s.SP Armored Train s.SP No. 210. If I can build all 12 Armored Train Cars in time and I might add my PanzerJäger Triebwagen to it) s.SP No 210 was ordered but never built.

Best Regards,

                Mark

 

 

Ok then Mark. Just let me know which one you will be doing and the manufacturer and scale please.

The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Saturday, January 10, 2009 10:29 AM

 Hellcat man wrote:
WarHammmer the Jagdtiger is fits together very well. I think it's one of Tamiya's finest models.

Awesome. It is a very tempting kit. I just wonder how it compares to the Dragon?

The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    November 2007
  • From: Toronto Ontario
Posted by Hellcat man on Saturday, January 10, 2009 8:03 AM
WarHammmer the Jagdtiger is fits together very well. I think it's one of Tamiya's finest models.

 ALEX ZELYK

  • Member since
    October 2004
Posted by MarkDunck on Saturday, January 10, 2009 6:48 AM

Put me down for either a:

Late M.A.N. Panther Ausf. G, kinda a what if as it will have IR equipment on it.

Or a PanzerJäger Triebwagen (Possibly a complete s.SP Armored Train s.SP No. 210. If I can build all 12 Armored Train Cars in time and I might add my PanzerJäger Triebwagen to it) s.SP No 210 was ordered but never built.

PanzerJäger Triebwagen

Best Regards,

                Mark

 

 

To Thine Ownself be True
  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Friday, January 9, 2009 9:18 PM

Sure thing FeldMarSchall. I would imagine that the Ju-88 night fighters would have been possibly used up to 1946 had the war continued. Welcome to the GB! You have been added to the list.

 Swanny wrote:

How much lead does it take to keep your nose on the ground?

In this case about eight sinkers.

 

Wow Matt! Eight sinkers? That seems like a lot of weight but I guess you would need it with the resin V-tail.

The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Cincinnati Ohio
Posted by DantheMan85 on Friday, January 9, 2009 7:33 PM

Hello, can I enter in this?

On my Work Bench: Tamiya Ford GT 1/24

Up Coming: ?

           

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.