mikeymize
Bockscar, interesting take on the technology angle.Seems like an oversimplification and yet very valid. I'm somewhat partial to the F-15 as it was the first aircraft I was assigned to; great radar, long range and two engines. F-16 were called lawn darts by our pilots but then again they were called "ego drivers" by the 16 jocks. I would have been more than happy to fly either one myself!
Mizer:
That's true,
Harry gave us the Catalina and B-58, so he always had the right ideas about technology vs strength.
Long range, I would take the F-15's, as Harry said himself, bigger engines, longer range, and 'supposedly'
just as maneuverable as an F-16.
Personally, i would never call an F-16 a "lawn dart"......
I would never insult a proven combat system with that cheap epithet.
Harry and John knew a thing or two. Obviously, to some degree, the lesson has been learned,
but in history, only the big shots get the credit.
What with technology leakage, only an idiot assumes the enemy is not up to date on theory.
I figure "Lawn Darts", a "Hornet's Nest", or an "Eagles' Nest is what we need up here a few arcs wider than Alaska........LOL
"Lawn Darts"....LOL....is that what the guys in 'shot-down' F-15's say"....
------Just an attitude adjustment for me Mizer,,,,,,,,I've never shot another airplane down.....or killed it or its pilot,
so, jess' my "never-been-there-opinion" guys. i say that out of respect for the guys here, or anyone they may have shot down.
-Dom
Dom