SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Show your Revell/Monogram builds

375353 views
1771 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: USA California
Posted by vetteman42 on Friday, January 27, 2012 3:15 PM

Hobby Lobby closed the stores around here, however there is Michaels Craft Stores, they carry Revell kits and offer a 40% and sometimes even 50% off coupons. Thats where I get all my Revell and Monogram kits and its even cheaper than evilbay where I used to get them.  For other kits I use my LHS and he gives me 20% off MSRP at least, most times it more like 30%.

Randy So many to build.......So little time

  • Member since
    June 2010
  • From: Austin, TX
Posted by DoogsATX on Friday, January 27, 2012 3:20 PM

stikpusher

Great prices there, how is their service/shipping?

Never had anything but positive experiences with them - a bit slow to get orders out the door. Probably Squadron-speed vs. Sprue Brothers. They're great for paint, too...

On the Bench: 1/32 Trumpeter P-47 | 1/32 Hasegawa Bf 109G | 1/144 Eduard MiG-21MF x2

On Deck:  1/350 HMS Dreadnought

Blog/Completed Builds: doogsmodels.com

 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Friday, January 27, 2012 3:38 PM

Paint is no worry here. Several well stocked LHS within short drives from my home or on the way in to work to fill that need.Cool I have never used Sprue Brothers. Squadron, Great Models, and Roll Models have been my online stores (besides the EDevilBay)

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Southern New Jersey
Posted by troublemaker66 on Friday, January 27, 2012 6:02 PM

Shawn M.

1/48 B-17G converted to RAF Fortress III using the paragon conversion:

 

http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5297/5503854563_ece3a63443_z.jpg

 

1/32 AH-64A Apache

http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6085/6026705276_b1476bf73d_z.jpg

 

 

Now they are two outstanding builds! Can`t say that I`ve ever seen a  "Fortress" painted up like a "Lanc" but I like it..I like it alot..(in my best Jim Carey)  YesBig Smile

Len Pytlewski

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • From: Iola, KS
Posted by MrRabbit on Saturday, January 28, 2012 10:20 AM

HAMMER: I understand what your saying and agree with you completely. All Im saying is the only reason I havent tackled the Tamigawa kits in my stash is because I believe I have a ways to go in improving my skills.  I don't want to get started on one of those kits till I've gotten better at cleaning up seems, shading,/weathering, masking....  I love Monograms kits because they turn out models Im happy to display and if I make mistakes it doesn't hurt so much knowing I only dished out $12 to $15 and I can go out, get the same kit, start over and learn from my mistakes.  Ive got a couple of Tamiya's 1/48 Lancasters in my stash that I cant wait to get started on. These planes are near and dear to me and I want to do a REALLY god job on them. But if I was to make rookie mistakes and ruin the kit $80 or more is going to hurt trying to replace the kit.

TROUBLEMAKER: B-17's were sold to England in the early parts of the war and Shawns build is a beauty. Though I have to admit, Ive never seen one in the night bombing colors. Not saying they didnt exist, just that I havent seen em. Most of the ones I saw were in the RAF's Coastal Command colors. Gray Green on top and white bottoms. There used to be a very talented builder on this site named Swanny. Some of the guys here can probably point you in the direction of his web site. He has a very nice build of one on his page. Plus his site was loaded full of tips to make better models. I know I learned alot from it.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Saturday, January 28, 2012 2:42 PM

That RAF B-17 is some sort of early Electronic Intellegince/Warfare bird IIRC. I have an issue of "Combat Aircraft" that has a great rundown on the various B-17s variants and there is a brief description with a color profile of that type. Possibly a B&W photo as well.  All the antennas and radomes were for ferreting out Luftwaffe radar and night fighter radio frequencies. I cant recall if it had jamming equipment on board as well. Due to their operating with the Bomber Command heavies at night, the Night Bomber camo scheme. Talk about a unique buildYes

Who's got the next R/M build photo for here?

 

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: Crawfordsville, Indiana
Posted by Wabashwheels on Saturday, January 28, 2012 3:07 PM

Nice thread Stik.  Here's a 1996 Revell-Monogram P-51B.  Aeromaster decals and a Tamiya canopy, with only minor adjustments for a good fit.

 

  • Member since
    December 2011
  • From: AZ
Posted by Luft Modeler on Saturday, January 28, 2012 3:16 PM

stikpusher

That RAF B-17 is some sort of early Electronic Intellegince/Warfare bird IIRC. I have an issue of "Combat Aircraft" that has a great rundown on the various B-17s variants and there is a brief description with a color profile of that type. Possibly a B&W photo as well.  All the antennas and radomes were for ferreting out Luftwaffe radar and night fighter radio frequencies. I cant recall if it had jamming equipment on board as well. Due to their operating with the Bomber Command heavies at night, the Night Bomber camo scheme. Talk about a unique buildYes

Who's got the next R/M build photo for here?

 

Jostle Jammer:

 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Saturday, January 28, 2012 3:40 PM

Wabash, another beautiful R/M build!

PZL, thanks for the additional info on the RAF Fort. So it was an active EW bird as well. Very interesting!

But that pic... overlapping panels and raised rivets...Surprise How 1970s Wink

 

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Lafayette, LA
Posted by Melgyver on Saturday, January 28, 2012 4:25 PM

Old Hawk Bearcat prop reworked to paddle blade and scratch built rocket stubs.

Scratch canopy locks and other details

Clear Left!

Mel

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Southern New Jersey
Posted by troublemaker66 on Saturday, January 28, 2012 6:36 PM

MrRabbit

HAMMER: I understand what your saying and agree with you completely. All Im saying is the only reason I havent tackled the Tamigawa kits in my stash is because I believe I have a ways to go in improving my skills.  I don't want to get started on one of those kits till I've gotten better at cleaning up seems, shading,/weathering, masking....  I love Monograms kits because they turn out models Im happy to display and if I make mistakes it doesn't hurt so much knowing I only dished out $12 to $15 and I can go out, get the same kit, start over and learn from my mistakes.  Ive got a couple of Tamiya's 1/48 Lancasters in my stash that I cant wait to get started on. These planes are near and dear to me and I want to do a REALLY god job on them. But if I was to make rookie mistakes and ruin the kit $80 or more is going to hurt trying to replace the kit.

TROUBLEMAKER: B-17's were sold to England in the early parts of the war and Shawns build is a beauty. Though I have to admit, Ive never seen one in the night bombing colors. Not saying they didnt exist, just that I havent seen em. Most of the ones I saw were in the RAF's Coastal Command colors. Gray Green on top and white bottoms. There used to be a very talented builder on this site named Swanny. Some of the guys here can probably point you in the direction of his web site. He has a very nice build of one on his page. Plus his site was loaded full of tips to make better models. I know I learned alot from it.

Rabbit-  I know they used `em, just never saw one in a night bomber scheme. I also know Swanny`s site...use his builds for ideas on mine sometimes. You`re right, he`s a very talented modeler with awesome looking builds. Thanks for the info!

Len

Len Pytlewski

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Saturday, January 28, 2012 8:12 PM

Nice additions to this thread MelYes I particularly like the Mustang and HunStick out tongue

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    December 2011
  • From: Alabama
Posted by Big_Dog on Saturday, January 28, 2012 9:44 PM

No where near some of the great looking models posted so far but here are a couple of pics of my first airplane model built in about 30 years. I did kinda let some stuff slide towards the end as I was seeing that I could already do better and did not want to go back and "fix" things.

 

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • From: Iola, KS
Posted by MrRabbit on Sunday, January 29, 2012 12:04 AM

Melgyver:  I love your builds... I wanted to ask, How did you paint the engine scorch marks on your 

F-100?

 

I posted these on the thread I already had going but they belong here too :D

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Lafayette, LA
Posted by Melgyver on Sunday, January 29, 2012 7:20 AM

MrRabitt,

On my F-100 I used MM Metalic paint for the base color and hand painted brown, brass and metalic blue to get the burnt metal effect.  Someone with a state of the art air brush could pobably get a little better effect.   The only gripe I had was some silvering of small decals.  I have to admitt this kit was built over 30 years ago!  Same for the F-51.  It's the same Mustang kit you are working on.  Worst thing was fitting the removable lower cowling.  Oh, check your tail wheel mount placement.  I think the kit has it too high in the fuselage, not at home to look at mine.  Just look a pictures of the aircraft you are building for little things like the distance between the top of the wheels and gear doors, etc.   Strut height will change with an empty or fully loaded aircraft.  Monograms B-17 is an offender, main gear mounts to far in, tires too close to engine nacells even for a fully loaded bird.   More pictures you look at the more little details will pop out!  On the F-100 I noticed a rubber block secured with wire mid way of the emergency landing hook to prevent contact and rubbing against the fuselage and drag chute cable at base of vertical fin.

Good luck with your Mustang build!

Clear Left!

Mel

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: St. Louis
Posted by Shawn M. on Monday, January 30, 2012 2:51 PM

the RAF Fortress III used in EW is not known very well, and even harder to research! I assure you mine is about as accurate as I could build it. Not saying perfect mind you by any grasp of the definition.

Thanks for the compliments, the Apache was fun, even more so since I dont own an airbrush so the whole paint scheme is done with a hairy tipped stick.

I love the smell of plastic in the morning

  • Member since
    December 2011
  • From: AZ
Posted by Luft Modeler on Monday, January 30, 2012 3:07 PM

Shawn M.

the RAF Fortress III used in EW is not known very well, and even harder to research! I assure you mine is about as accurate as I could build it. Not saying perfect mind you by any grasp of the definition.

 

Your B-17 Mk.III is a beauty, here is one done in 1/72 by a guy in the UK:

 

  • Member since
    January 2012
  • From: Belgium, EU
Posted by Ninetalis on Monday, January 30, 2012 5:48 PM

I forgot to add this one,


A Douglas A-20 Havoc, I think G model?
It is a sort of "what-if" plane, gave it the africa paint sheme of the US army and added some pin-up art.
I think this is a re-box issue from AMT or something? Can't really tell... definitely isn't a Revell or Monogram kit!

Regards Ninetalis

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • From: Iola, KS
Posted by MrRabbit on Monday, January 30, 2012 7:28 PM

Ninetalis
 

 definitely isn't a Revell or Monogram kit!


Regards Ninetalis

 

then why post it here??

 

  • Member since
    January 2012
  • From: Belgium, EU
Posted by Ninetalis on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 2:33 AM

MrRabbit

 

 Ninetalis:
 

 

 definitely isn't a Revell or Monogram kit!

 

then why post it here??

 

 

Ninetalis

 

I think this is a re-box issue from AMT or something? Can't really tell... definitely isn't a Revell or Monogram kit!

Regards Ninetalis


At least read the whole discripsion...

I will make it a little more clearer,
definitely isn't an ORIGINAL Revell or Monogram kit

Regards Ninetalis.

 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 5:30 AM

Ninetalis

I forgot to add this one,


http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss153/Ninetalis/Modelscale/havoc.jpg

A Douglas A-20 Havoc, I think G model?
It is a sort of "what-if" plane, gave it the africa paint sheme of the US army and added some pin-up art.
I think this is a re-box issue from AMT or something? Can't really tell... definitely isn't a Revell or Monogram kit!

Regards Ninetalis

Was there a Revell Germany issue of this AMT kit? Your post does not say that, and given its AMT bloodline, unless RoG issued it under their label, it is not part of the family. But still a nice kit Wink

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    January 2012
  • From: Belgium, EU
Posted by Ninetalis on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 7:51 AM

Okay, let's just get this straight right?

Box-Art


BOX


A forum topic on britmodeller of somebody who turned this into something nice

A In-Box Review
Kit review

The box content is completly THE SAME, this Italeri kit was a re-release of the AMT kit,
Just as the Tigercat and many more kit of Italeri, Italeri or AMT must have sold the mold or mold design to Revell
And they made THIS KIT out of that! 

Regards Ninetalis 

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Nebraska, USA
Posted by CallSignOWL on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 8:10 AM

Ninetalis

Okay, let's just get this straight right?

 

The box content is completly THE SAME, this Italeri kit was a re-release of the AMT kit,
Just as the Tigercat and many more kit of Italeri, Italeri or AMT must have sold the mold or mold design to Revell
And they made THIS KIT out of that! 

Regards Ninetalis 

 

so it is an ex-amt/italeri mold, right? Just because it was re-boxed by Revell/monogram does not make it a revell/monogram kit. I'm pretty sure this thread was for original monogram/revell molds, but I can understand the confusion surrounding reboxings of kits.

------------------------

Now that I'm here, where am I??

  • Member since
    January 2012
  • From: Belgium, EU
Posted by Ninetalis on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 8:40 AM

IT'S A REVELL BOX FOR CHRIST SAKE!

do you even have the slightest idea how many Re-boxing stuff there is?

Oortiz 10 - A18 on page 1= Matchbox
Troublemaker66 - Pro Modeler Ta 154 " Moskito" on page 6=  Dragon
Jmabx - Fokker D VII  on page 7 = Aurora (The baron confirms this on page 9)

Can't say wich ones, but i'm sure that there are a lot more in this thread... 

Revell of Germany's Spitfire Mk.IX in 1:48 = a Hasegawa rebox
Revell of Germany's Val Type 99 in 1:48 = a hasegawa rebox
Revell of Germany's AR 234 in 1:48 = a hasegawa rebox
Revell of Germany's Spad in 1:48 = an Eduard rebox
Revell of Germany's Albatros in 1:48 = an Eduard rebox
Revell of Germany's HE-162 in 1:32 = a scaled up 1:48  Tamiya he-162 

Can we stop whining now? thanks.
 
Regards Ninetalis

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Nebraska, USA
Posted by CallSignOWL on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 8:46 AM

Ninetalis

IT'S A REVELL BOX FOR CHRIST SAKE!

do you even have the slightest idea how many Re-boxing stuff there is?

Oortiz 10 - A18 on page 1= Matchbox
Troublemaker66 - Pro Modeler Ta 154 " Moskito" on page 6=  Dragon
Jmabx - Fokker D VII  on page 7 = Aurora (The baron confirms this on page 9)

Can't say wich ones, but i'm sure that there are a lot more in this thread... 

Revell of Germany's Spitfire Mk.IX in 1:48 = a Hasegawa rebox
Revell of Germany's Val Type 99 in 1:48 = a hasegawa rebox
Revell of Germany's AR 234 in 1:48 = a hasegawa rebox
Revell of Germany's Spad in 1:48 = an Eduard rebox
Revell of Germany's Albatros in 1:48 = an Eduard rebox
Revell of Germany's HE-162 in 1:32 = a scaled up 1:48  Tamiya he-162 

Can we stop whining now? thanks.
 
Regards Ninetalis

 

thats my point. Its a revell BOX, but not a revell KIT.

There's no need to be so defensive, its a very easy mistake to make. The reboxing of different kits by different companies is very confusing at times!

------------------------

Now that I'm here, where am I??

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Hancock, Me USA
Posted by p38jl on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 8:51 AM

jeeeez... everyone.. relaz.. take a breath.. woosah... Beer

[Photobucket]

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Southern New Jersey
Posted by troublemaker66 on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 9:21 AM

Ninetalis

IT'S A REVELL BOX FOR CHRIST SAKE!

do you even have the slightest idea how many Re-boxing stuff there is?

Oortiz 10 - A18 on page 1= Matchbox
Troublemaker66 - Pro Modeler Ta 154 " Moskito" on page 6=  Dragon
Jmabx - Fokker D VII  on page 7 = Aurora (The baron confirms this on page 9)

Can't say wich ones, but i'm sure that there are a lot more in this thread... 

Revell of Germany's Spitfire Mk.IX in 1:48 = a Hasegawa rebox
Revell of Germany's Val Type 99 in 1:48 = a hasegawa rebox
Revell of Germany's AR 234 in 1:48 = a hasegawa rebox
Revell of Germany's Spad in 1:48 = an Eduard rebox
Revell of Germany's Albatros in 1:48 = an Eduard rebox
Revell of Germany's HE-162 in 1:32 = a scaled up 1:48  Tamiya he-162 

Can we stop whining now? thanks.
 
Regards Ninetalis

Calm down before you get this thread locked. We all understand it`s a re-box of the AMT kit. The Monogram mafia GB was original Monogram kit molds only but I believe this thread had no such parameters...just showing off what can be done with Revellogram kits. I think this is where the confusion lies. Lets knock off the bickering and get back on track and show off those builds.

Len

Len Pytlewski

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Southern New Jersey
Posted by troublemaker66 on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 9:44 AM

I just re-read Stikpusher`s original post and it says show your Revell/ Monogram builds...didn`t say, one way or the other, anything about re-boxings of other company`s kits. The way I see it, Stik should make the call since it`s his baby, and that`ll be that.....Big Smile

 

Len Pytlewski

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • From: Iola, KS
Posted by MrRabbit on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 10:18 AM

Ninetails: I apologize for starting this whole confusion. You threw me off when you said that it definitely wasnt a monogram kit.  Reboxing counts I think but you didnt mention it was a rebox.

  • Member since
    January 2012
  • From: Belgium, EU
Posted by Ninetalis on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 10:30 AM

MrRabbit

Ninetails: I apologize for starting this whole confusion. You threw me off when you said that it definitely wasnt a monogram kit.  Reboxing counts I think but you didnt mention it was a rebox.

Sure, no offense taken, I was just hugly annoyed by the fact that there are so many non-original-revellogram-reboxed stuff (here), but I get to take all the 'credit' for posting a non-revellogram kit...
And then even start saying that i'm the one who is wrong (while having proven my point multiple times)
and saying that maybe I'm going to get this thread locked cuz of me? seriously, thats not going to get us anywhere... so, thats why I really felt annoyed by the whole thing...
But enough of that, it had a Revell logo on it, so it counts for me, and I guess that's all what matters...
A pitty that this whole thing had to explode into everybody's face like that...

Anyway, that was my havoc, lol...Toast

EDIT: I have just checked the box, there are 119 parts in that kit, while on that review,
there are only 103 parts int that AMT kit.

Regards Ninetalis.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.