SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Admins,a couple of "why not ?" questions.

1734 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: California
Admins,a couple of "why not ?" questions.
Posted by rabbiteatsnake on Thursday, August 13, 2009 7:31 PM
First, why is it that this site requires photos to be published on the web, but avatars upload from our own image file?.  I've been told its due to band width, but I don't see what fat musicians have to do with it at all.Wink [;)] Forgive my ignorance but seriously Why?.    Next what harm is it to speak off topic, say in odds&ends about history ( Including politics.).  It seems to me that most modelers here build military and that by default is inextricably entwined with history.  I for one would like to be trusted to express such things dispassionatly, without a fight breaking out.  I realize I've witnessed contests of who could release the most impressive stream of hydrolized urea, yet I see no harm to the younger minds welcomed here,if hyperbole and insults are excluded.
The devil is in the details...and somtimes he's in my sock drawer. On the bench. Airfix 1/24 bf109E scratch conv to 109 G14AS MPC1/24 ju87B conv to 87G Rev 1/48 B17G toF Trump 1/32 f4u-1D and staying a1D Scratch 1/16 TigerII.
Moderator
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: my keyboard dreaming of being at the workbench
Posted by Aaron Skinner on Friday, August 14, 2009 9:26 AM
Anthony,

Having photos published on the Web and linked to the Forum keeps our site and Forum running smoothly. Avatars by nature are small files so they won’t slow the system. Photos on the other hand can be huge and it doesn’t take many to begin affecting the site.

We have never discouraged people talking history, and it's not that discussions of politics are forbidden on FSM's Forum. Instead we say “strongly discouraged” and for good reason. We've seen many threads start well with several people discussing a topic with perfect civility. Unfortunately, human nature inevitably takes over, someone takes exception to something being posted, insults and vitriol follow, feelings get hurt, backs get bowed up, people threaten to leave, and, in some extreme cases, members get banned. There are plenty of places on the Internet to find discussions about politics where those things are allowed, so we don't think FSM needs to be also. Think of our Forum as a refuge from the rancor, a place where modeling comes first and is the common experience that ties all of the members together no matter the differences in their political views.

Cheers,
Aaron

Aaron Skinner

Editor

FineScale Modeler

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: California
Posted by rabbiteatsnake on Saturday, August 22, 2009 1:36 AM

First thank you for the speedy reply.  I must say I'm glad to hear that if I say, "Nixon's use of  B-52s in southeast asia was a controversial gambit"., I've not breeched some protocall in doing so.  I fully agree that cool heads should prevail in such discourse and appreciate the latittude you've outlined in you're reply.  If I should find myself involved in a thread that looks to be heading toward a verbal donnybrook, I promise to graciously excuse myself.  Thanks again Aaron, I'm grateful for the personal touch your reply represents

Brest wishes,

Anthony

The devil is in the details...and somtimes he's in my sock drawer. On the bench. Airfix 1/24 bf109E scratch conv to 109 G14AS MPC1/24 ju87B conv to 87G Rev 1/48 B17G toF Trump 1/32 f4u-1D and staying a1D Scratch 1/16 TigerII.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: 41 Degrees 52.4 minutes North; 72 Degrees 7.3 minutes West
Posted by bbrowniii on Friday, August 28, 2009 2:56 PM

Can I ask a follow up question?? Tongue [:P]

In the past couple of weeks, two threads I am familiar with were locked (both for good reason, IMO).  At the same time, others were deleted.  In the past, threads have gotten a warning from an admin that they were on the verge of being locked or deleted.  So, my question is, what is the threshold?  How do you guys decide to lock some, warn some, delete some?  Truth be told, I have been in threads I was sure would get locked but never did, while others that seemed tense, but under control, spontaneously disappear like Amelia Erhardt (sorry, couldn't resist).

I'm not complaining.  You guys have a tough job.  I'm just curious if there are specific triggers (other than, say, an F-bomb) that you look for?

'All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing' - Edmund Burke (1770 ??)

 

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posted by model maniac 96 on Friday, August 28, 2009 4:21 PM
Ummm, interesting question, I have also wondered that....


Thanks, Jim
"Veni, Vidi, Vici" Julius Caesar: I came, I saw, I conquered.
  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Crystal Lake, IL
Posted by firesmacker on Friday, August 28, 2009 4:26 PM

I think that after years of doing this, they can see when a thread is quickly spiraling out of control and going beyond a healthy debate and just go ahead and kill it. Sounds like a good policy to me. Keep in mind, they can also log in as a guest just to see how things are playing out and then step in when needed.

Regards,

Jeff

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: 41 Degrees 52.4 minutes North; 72 Degrees 7.3 minutes West
Posted by bbrowniii on Saturday, August 29, 2009 2:30 PM
 firesmacker wrote:

I think that after years of doing this, they can see when a thread is quickly spiraling out of control and going beyond a healthy debate and just go ahead and kill it. Sounds like a good policy to me. Keep in mind, they can also log in as a guest just to see how things are playing out and then step in when needed.

Regards,

Jeff

Jeff,

You are probably right.  I'd just be interested to see what Aaron or Matt or Kelly has to say.  As I said, there are times that to me, as a participant, the decision to delete has seemed kind of random, leaving me wondering why a particular thread wasn't simply locked.  So, I'm just curious...

'All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing' - Edmund Burke (1770 ??)

 

Moderator
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: my keyboard dreaming of being at the workbench
Posted by Aaron Skinner on Friday, September 4, 2009 10:38 AM

Boyd,

Whilst removing threads is not our first choice sometimes it is a necessity, because the content has become inappropriate. Simply locking it in these instances leaves the inappropriate content still visible, so we remove it to avoid people seeing it.

Hope that answers the question in part.

 

Aaron Skinner

Editor

FineScale Modeler

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: 41 Degrees 52.4 minutes North; 72 Degrees 7.3 minutes West
Posted by bbrowniii on Friday, September 4, 2009 12:10 PM
 Aaron Skinner wrote:

Boyd,

Whilst removing threads is not our first choice sometimes it is a necessity, because the content has become inappropriate. Simply locking it in these instances leaves the inappropriate content still visible, so we remove it to avoid people seeing it.

Hope that answers the question in part.

 

Aaron

Inappropriate content?  In a thread on FSM?  C'mon, say it ain't so... Tongue [:P]

I assumed as much.  Thanks for getting back to me.  Just out of curiousity, do all the FSM Admins have deletion 'powers' or does it fall to one or two of you?

Boyd

'All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing' - Edmund Burke (1770 ??)

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.