ajlafleche wrote: |
My real answer:
Actually, most of the 15 or so kits in my stash were gifts. The rest
were bought equally at a local hobby store and from Internet stores.
Unless 9, 11,
or 13 of your kits were gifts, you have an answer in that there was an
odd number of kit YOU purchased. Wherever the pluralilty lies is where
you primarily buy your models.
|
|
Actually, about 11 of them really are gifts. And figuring out the
simple majority of the source of the rest seems to go against the
spirit of the poll -- I'm equally likely to get something at the local
hobby shop as I am through the Internet. Partially this is because I
really don't make impulse buys (anymore ), so I'm pretty methodical
about what I buy.
My real answer:
How about all four? If anything, I would be (and have been) willing to
sacrifice ease of construction for accuracy, price, and level of
detail. The Roden 1/72 scale kits are a prime example of reasonably
priced ($10 or so), accurate, detailed models with a little bit of
chutzspa needed to put them together. This leads me to my next
complaint...
Your next
answer gives all the information you need to really answer this
question as well in you're asking for basic kits in the 5-10 dollar
range.
My real answer:
A basic kit for $30?!? Are you kidding me? How about a basic kit for
$10, or even $5? Roden, Toko, Airfix, Revell-Monogram all offer kits at
astoundingly low prices.Those are basic kits. And the Roden ones don't even fall in the basic kit category.
You are really answering # 3 "low price."
|
|
Not true. I'm really arguing about the assumption that a "basic kit"
would retail for $30. That assumption ignores a huge segment of
available models. I've bought a few $30 models, as well as aftermaket
parts and decals, but I wouldn't consider what I bought to be basic
kits. For example, the Fujimi 1/72 scale F-14D is not a basic kit: it
has some PE parts, vinyl tires, and four engines with stands, and a
full set of air-to-air weapons. It's not a "basic" kit by my
definition, and I paid a little under $30 for it a year or so ago.
At about the same time, I picked up a Revell-Monogram 1/48 scale P-38
for about $7. It has parts for three variations, but does not have the
fine detail or (from what I've read) the nice fit of the Fujimi kit. To
my mind, the Revell-Monogram kit is a prime example of a "basic" kit.
Another "basic" kit
that I've bought and am working on is the semi-scratchbuilt Continental
Navy Brigantine Lexington (http://www.briglex.org). That ran me $75
plus shipping, plus another $40 or so for the cannons. I haven't yet
bought the stuff I'll need for the rigging. However, the semi-kit only
has what's needed to build the hull, and deck. I really will need to
scratchbuild a lot of the vessel.
I'm not complaining because I think I got more than my money's worth,
but this does provide another perspective on what constitutes a "basic"
kit.
So, what do you think a "basic" kit consists of, and how much do you think it should cost?
Now, of course no
poll is ever perfect. A better way, but far more complex, would be to
have you rate each choice in the order of importance to you. |
|
That may well have been better. Having designed a few polls myself, I can fully sympathize with the need to keep things simple.
The heart of the problem I had answering some of the questions was that
I think a $30 kit should not be basic, have good fit, accuracy, and
detail. Academy, Fujimi, Hasegawa, Roden, Revell Germany and others put
out kits that meet those criteria and are at or even way below the $30
level.
So, what's meant by basic? Why is $30 offered as a low price point?
Regards, and thanks for your observations.