wilsonbrucea wrote: |
Bgrigg wrote: |
Finescale Modeling and Kalmbach do not charge for their forums, they
are available free of charge. They have graciously been offering us
prime content on the web for free, and now the free ride is over. As I
buy the magazine already, having to enter a code each month is a small
inconvenience to access such excellent coverage. If you subscribe you
save yourself the effort of typing in some numbers.
If all you want to do is access the forum, then it is no matter to you at all.
|
|
I agree that Kalmbach has provided excellent content on their pages but
there is nothing at all in this new scheme that will guarantee any
increase in revenues. I would be extremely surprised if the vast
majority of the users of these pages are not already subscribers to FSM
or pick it up regularly at their LHS or news stand. There will be
no net effect from these people so why change the system that was
already in place by having to enter a secret password for the forums
and other content?
The ones who may make a difference are the casual readers who pick up a
copy occasionaly so I would expect there not to be a great influx of
revenue from them.
There is nothing in the new scheme that would prevent someone from
perusuing FSM at the LHS or newstand, borrowing a copy from a friend or
reading it a library and writing down the secret password so again no
revenue. I would also supect the secret password will soon be
available on the various newsgroups so again no revenue.
There is no way to guarantee that any one participating in these forums
have actually purchased FSM. One way that might work is to have
access limited to subscribers only but that would alienate all of those
people who prefer to support their LHS or news stand and purchase FSM
there. And there is still opportunity for the "secret" password
to get spread around. The other way is to make it a "pay-for-use"
site but again there are potentials for abuse and very likely a
decrease in the numbers participating not to mention the number of
people who would be upset with such a scheme.
I have almost every issue of FSM back to the beginning and will
continue to buy FSM at my local news stand. I just do not see how
this scheme is an improvement on what was in place.
Bruce Wilson
Barrie, Ontario
|
|
A much better response than your previous remark. I can't disagree with
much of what you have said, the potential for abuse is very great.
However I, nor you, are the masters of this domain. I am sure that
Kalmbach struggled mightily to come up with a scenario that would allow
them to increase revenues without penalizing the subscribers, the
casual purchaser, or their many forum members. Only time will tell if
this particular idea merits the effort involved. For what it is worth,
I like the new layout.
Far too many publications have gone the way of the dodo, or have ceased
publication only to remain as a web presence. I would hate to see this
happen to FSM. I would rather a magazine in my hand, rather than having
to scroll through page after page of web pages with flashing ads,
charged out as a monthly or yearly charge.
I would like to thank you for responding to my reply in a thoughtful
manner. It is more akin to what I expect from a fellow Canadian!