SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Problem reading the Forum listings

2492 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: USA
Problem reading the Forum listings
Posted by Tinker on Tuesday, November 8, 2005 4:18 PM

At first blush, I don't like this new design as much as the old one, but I'm willing to give it a chance.  The main problem for me ( and perhaps others ) is that the size and color of the fonts used on the Forum's titles, listings, statements, etc. is very hard to read.  There are some of us who do not have microscopic vision.  I have a 17 inch monitor, set for wall-to-wall window and cannot make out much of the writing.  I had no problem reading the font size and color on the old site.  Please adjust this.  I'm not using this large font as a way to scream my message----I just wanted to make sure I can read my own post.  Laugh [(-D] Laugh [(-D]Laugh [(-D]Laugh [(-D]

Thank you.

" 'Polls' are surveys of uninformed people who think it's possible to get the answer wrong." ...Ann Coulter
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Waukesha, WI
Posted by David Voss on Tuesday, November 8, 2005 4:34 PM
 Tinker wrote:
but I'm willing to give it a chance.

Thank you for giving it a chance and letting us work out issues like this.

 Tinker wrote:
Please adjust this.

As soon as I roll my chair back to my desk...  Wink [;)]

We'll be looking at the code for the font sizes a bit closer and most likely be making some adjustments.  I know we've found where it's an issue on one of our Windows 2000 computers.

In the meantime, if you update your profile, there is an option for adjusting font size (under the Site Options section).  The options are small, normal, large, largest.  Perhaps by changing it to large or even largest it will be sufficient.
David Voss Senior Web Developer Kalmbach Publishing Co. Join me on the FSM Map
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by Tinker on Tuesday, November 8, 2005 4:45 PM

Thank you for checking this out.  Because of a detached retina in my right eye that didn't fully correct, I have trouble reading very small print----especially when it's color makes it seem washed-out.  As I mentioned, the font size and color used on the old site was useable.   I didn't know those adjustments are available at the profile site.  I'll try it. 

Thank you for your very fast reply.  Big Smile [:D]

" 'Polls' are surveys of uninformed people who think it's possible to get the answer wrong." ...Ann Coulter
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by Tinker on Tuesday, November 8, 2005 5:05 PM
Thank you, David Voss. I went to my profile page and selected the LARGE  font, saved the change, and can now actually read the listings again.  The lettering still seems washed-out, but at least I can read it.  Smile [:)]   Maybe, after the dust settles a bit, you can increase the weight of the lettering, but that isn't such an emergency now.   Laugh [(-D]
" 'Polls' are surveys of uninformed people who think it's possible to get the answer wrong." ...Ann Coulter
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Barrow in Furness, Cumbria, UK.
Posted by davros on Tuesday, November 8, 2005 5:17 PM

Strangely, Mozilla Firefox does not seem to have the same problem with the site. I've noticed similar problems on a few sites. For me Accurate Armour's site always displays in a tiny font on IE but is easily readable on Firefox.

I have set 'Largest size' in my profile so I can view this site comfortably.

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Waukesha, WI
Posted by David Voss on Tuesday, November 8, 2005 5:27 PM
As far as I know, everyone who's complained about tiny fonts was using IE.  I've never had a problem with Firefox in regards to fonts.

One thing I liked about this forum was the ability to adjust font sizes from your profile.  If the default is too small, there is the option to increase it.  In regards to the lettering appearing washed out, it might be the font.  Notice any difference between the following?

Test Font - This should be "Garamond".
Test Font - This should be "Georgia".
Test Font - This should be "Tahoma".
Test Font - This should be "Verdana".
Test Font - This should be "whatever the default is".


David Voss Senior Web Developer Kalmbach Publishing Co. Join me on the FSM Map
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Upper left side of the lower Penninsula of Mich
Posted by dkmacin on Tuesday, November 8, 2005 5:40 PM
YEEECH!
This is horrible!
I have no clue as to what is going on! Mr. Thompson says there is a code in the, dare I say it? newsstand issue for December. Where? Then when I go to get signed up I cannot because there is NO CODE in the December issue! (The January 06 issue is shown, but I doubt even subscribers have this one yet.)
So now I am signed in as the lowest of the low, temp member.
I ask you, is this the way a "loyal" reader since '87 is to be treated?

Don

I know it's only rock and roll, but I like it.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 8, 2005 5:43 PM
i cant find the code in december issue ?
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by Tinker on Tuesday, November 8, 2005 5:49 PM

None of the test fonts you used seemed washed-out.  Of course, I had previously returned to my profile page and selected the largest  font size  and that seems to have taken care of my problems.   I can blame the rest on my own eyes.  Thank you very much, David, for working with me on this in such a timely way-----very professional on your part.   I forgot to specify my browser.  It's IE of course. 

 

" 'Polls' are surveys of uninformed people who think it's possible to get the answer wrong." ...Ann Coulter
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Waukesha, WI
Posted by David Voss on Tuesday, November 8, 2005 6:08 PM
 dkmacin wrote:
So now I am signed in as the lowest of the low, temp member.
I ask you, is this the way a "loyal" reader since '87 is to be treated?

No, it isn't and I do apologize for the situation ... you were told there would be one and there wasn't.

Since it's already been discussed in another thread, I would like to direct your attention to that particular thread for more information. -- What secret code?

As for temp members being "the lowest of the low", nobody has or should classify temp members as such.  Perhaps it's folly to think in such a manner, but we're all modelers here (most everyone) and should treat each other equally with respect.  Smile [:)]
David Voss Senior Web Developer Kalmbach Publishing Co. Join me on the FSM Map
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.