SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

First Vietnam Mig Kill?

1787 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Saturday, December 3, 2016 11:10 AM

Yes, but the ultimate proof of concept of a fighter plane is the air to air kill. Especially against what can be considered a "peer" contemporary design from the other side. The Mig-17 and F-100 were developed with the lessons of air combat in Korea then going on between the Mig-15 and F-86. Both were highly successful designs that served worldwide. First as fighters and later as fighter bombers. And while the Mig-17 would score numerous kills under the flags of many nations, the F-100 did not. And this incident appears to be the only encounter between the two types in a combat air to air situation with shots fired.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Saturday, December 3, 2016 1:06 AM

Also in the war the concept of kills and body counts became political.

And in a certain sense an aircraft type having no kills is also a good thing.

But F-102, F-106 and F-89 didn't either.

 

 

 

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Friday, December 2, 2016 11:54 PM

Rev, I seriously doubt anybody is losing sleep over this piece of history. And I know the military is glacially slow at modifying or correcting records. That is just who they are. I just hope someday that they do correct the record. The information is out there, the rest is up to the folks who make such decisions.

ikar, I have read of one Thud Weasel crew who claimed a kill made by an emergency jettison of their centerline MER of a Mig "trapped in their six". Depending upon the source, the kill was allowed or disallowed. 

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Orlando, Florida
Posted by ikar01 on Friday, December 2, 2016 8:09 PM

knew a Weasel crew that tried to claim a kill when the mig that was chasing them disappeared.  All they saw was one of their drop tsnks tumbling through the air and a big ball of fire at another location.  Since they were alone and there was no film, they lost it.

The courage those guys had during that was was incredible. I worked for a LtCol. who had over 900 combat, not standard flying, hours in a O-1.

 

  • Member since
    May 2016
Posted by Revenant on Friday, December 2, 2016 6:59 PM

stikpusher

True the Air Force gave credit for a probable kill. But since the Viets opened up their archives and thheir side admits to the loss, it should be upgraded. The F-100's only air to air kill. And as bad of a day as that was for the Air Force there, two Thuds lost to Migs, plus a couple more to AAA, not to mention the target surviving two days of strikes in a row, a confirmation would be a bright spot on an otherwise bad day.

 

True, but I'm not thinking a lot of folks are losing sleep over this...And as a military historian I mean that with no disrespect...I think that as modelers/historians we sometimes fool ourselves into thinking people have the same priorities as we do...

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Friday, December 2, 2016 6:15 PM

True the Air Force gave credit for a probable kill. But since the Viets opened up their archives and thheir side admits to the loss, it should be upgraded. The F-100's only air to air kill. And as bad of a day as that was for the Air Force there, two Thuds lost to Migs, plus a couple more to AAA, not to mention the target surviving two days of strikes in a row, a confirmation would be a bright spot on an otherwise bad day.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Friday, December 2, 2016 5:07 PM

Kilgus did get a "probable", and the pilot of the Mig may have been Le Minh Huan, who shot down Magnusson.

-"Mig 17/19 Aces of the Vietnam War"

 

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    May 2016
Posted by Revenant on Friday, December 2, 2016 5:00 PM

ConfusedUrban legend...

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Naples, FL
Posted by tempestjohnny on Friday, December 2, 2016 9:59 AM
Definitely think they should award him the kill

 

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: Central Florida
Posted by plasticjunkie on Friday, December 2, 2016 6:35 AM

That is quite a story and too bad he wasn't credited for that Mig kill. It certainly sounds like he got that one with his guns.

Destiny has a way for us all. He did 3 tours in Nam, flew hundreds of hours yet he's killed in a traffic accident in DC. 

 GIFMaker.org_jy_Ayj_O

 

 

Too many models to build, not enough time in a lifetime!!

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
First Vietnam Mig Kill?
Posted by stikpusher on Thursday, December 1, 2016 9:03 PM

According to official US histories, the first confirmed kills of North Vietnamese Migs during the war there were made by Navy and Air Force F-4s,  in June and July 1965 respectively. But...

http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/f-100-versus-mig-17-the-air-battle-nobody-told-you-about/

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.