SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

X = Kit Choice +Age ?

1874 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: Fresno, CA
Posted by Dan A on Saturday, April 17, 2010 10:50 PM

As a kid, I preferred non-military land vehicles. Now I'm building armor and aircraft, plus the odd car; some of my car kits will probably never be built. I guess my tastes now run toward models of vehicles that are prohibitively expensive in 1:1, and that I can't legally operate anyway.

 

In progress: Hasegawa P-51D/K (being built as a D), Tamiya Morris Mini Cooper 1275S, Testors Kaman H-43B Huskie (held up by lack of parts)

To be resumed sooner or later: Academy M151A2 with Eduard photo-etch

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Thursday, April 8, 2010 9:40 AM

Hans von Hammer
  Even if space is a limitation, that particular kit's wingspan makes it doable with a much narrower base than an ordinary 1/32 scale bird...

The F-104 wingspan is one of the reasons why owning at least one built up kit in 1/32 is so nice. The second is so many colorful paint schemes !

  • Member since
    June 2008
  • From: Iowa
Posted by Hans von Hammer on Thursday, April 8, 2010 9:31 AM

As I have a number of Revell 1/32 F-104  kits needing work- making duplicate parts will result in a sort of F-104 assembly line. Too bad I can't make it into a diorama.

Why not?  Even if space is a limitation, that particular kit's wingspan makes it doable with a much narrower base than an ordinary 1/32 scale bird...

  • Member since
    June 2008
  • From: Iowa
Posted by Hans von Hammer on Thursday, April 8, 2010 9:26 AM

the Baron

 Hans von Hammer:

...an' I'm happier 'n a sow with new mud... 

 

I'm disappointed in you, Hammer.  A real nostalgia builder would want old mud.   Wink

Only if you're an old sow that's building with mud....  Reckon that's what m' first ex-wife would do...

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Bethlehem PA
Posted by the Baron on Wednesday, April 7, 2010 11:32 AM

Hans von Hammer

...an' I'm happier 'n a sow with new mud... 

I'm disappointed in you, Hammer.  A real nostalgia builder would want old mud.   Wink

The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Wednesday, April 7, 2010 11:26 AM

Hans von Hammer

For me, "X" doesn't equal kit choice + age, but rather the Age + Huge Spares box + Imagination = kit choice... Gimme an old Revellogram Wildcat for 12.00 and my spares boxes an' I'm happier 'n a sow with new mud...

Due to changing kit choices I've also built up a large spares box which I intend to use for the latest kit purchases.

One advantage of picking the kits like Rommels Rod and Messa-Schitzel is that I can add parts from a variety of kits that are completely unrelated to the subject so long as the end result looks like it fits the spirit of the original design.

Unfortunately, I've found the 1/24th DB 601 is a bit too big to squeeze into that Rommel's Rod engine compartment. Big Smile Perhaps not completely impossible but some shoe-horning and hood alteration will be required.

Seriously, I see your point about the Monogram kits and the present crop of releases now have good quality decals which keep cost low.

I hope to make resin castings of any detail scratch building I intend to do on an old kit and store the molds for future work as a time saving feature.

As I have a number of Revell 1/32 F-104  kits needing work- making duplicate parts will result in a sort of F-104 assembly line. Too bad I can't make it into a diorama.

 

  • Member since
    June 2008
  • From: Iowa
Posted by Hans von Hammer on Wednesday, April 7, 2010 6:58 AM

It's no secret that I prefer the old kits, 60's-70's-80's, bring 'em on... I love 'em, both for the price and the nostalgia, but also for what they DON'T include, which means I gotta MAKE it...

For me, "X" doesn't equal kit choice + age, but rather the Age + Huge Spares box + Imagination = kit choice... My thing is taking the afore-mentioned "3-Dollar" kits and making them look like a "30-dollar" one without spending the additional 27.00...   Detailing and super-detailing should be fun AND cheap and the only real cost is time... And I got plenty... I'm retired military, got a civilian cake-job that lets me make my own hours and I don't even have to leave the building to go to work (I'm an apartment building super).

Y'all can have the 120.00 TrumpeDragomiya 1/32 P-51 with 400 parts and a pound of brass... Gimme an old Revellogram Wildcat for 12.00 and my spares boxes an' I'm happier 'n a sow with new mud...

 

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Tuesday, April 6, 2010 11:52 PM

Manstein's revenge

Yeah.......its called senility...

Experience leads the way....Bow DownBow DownBow DownBow Down

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Bethlehem PA
Posted by the Baron on Tuesday, April 6, 2010 8:12 PM

A lot of my purchases now are from the same manufacturers I bought from as a kid, too.  That's Monogram for 1/48 and Revell for 1/72, some Aurora and Lindberg thrown in, for much the same reasons as other nostalgia builders-I enjoyed them back then, and I still enjoy them, and I like to tackle them with the skills I've learned over the years.  But I do buy newer kits, too, Accurate Miniatures, Classic Airframes, Eduard.  And I have a mixed bag of ship kits, in 1/700, Hasegawa, Fujimi, Tamiya, but also Hobby Boss and Trumpeter.

I'm not a competition builder, I build what I like, and I like to try scratchbuilding and superdetailing, so I'll tend to the older kits, since they're often a good starting point for that kind of work.  And I think Monogram's 1/48 line reached a very nice level of detail in the 70s, with the large bomber kits, and kits like the TBD, the B-25 and B-26.

The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Tuesday, April 6, 2010 7:59 PM

I am in a similar boat. But for different reasons. I fond myslef trying my hand again with my current skills on kits I built as a kid. I like picking up some of the Revell and Monogram re issues, and also trying my hand on some of the Daves Deals/Old School kits just for nostalgic value. I also ahve been eyeballing some of the movie monster kits I used to build back as a kid. As far as painting goes, once i got an airbrush, I really got away from area hand brushing, although I think I had that technique down nicely. But my skill there has decined thru lack of use. I never cared for rattle cans and only used those a few times and was not impressed or keen on the results.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 6, 2010 7:25 PM

Yeah.......its called senility...

  • Member since
    January 2007
Posted by Gigatron on Tuesday, April 6, 2010 7:16 PM

Nope, I've been pretty consistent during both modeling phases of my life.  From the time I was 5 until I was 15 and from 33 onward, I've always been about "reality" - even when building sci-fi kits.  I can't seem to get into goofy looking kits like Rat Rods or egg-planes.  To me, they're too toy-like and it goes against everything I've tried to accomplish as a model builder.  Maybe it's a minor OCD-like condition.

But, I am, by no means, a rivet counter.  I'm not one to hack up a kit because it's scale fidelity is off by +/-3mm.  But I will add detail that I know is missing and try to make it look as real as I could possibly muster.  I was never happy with brush painting exteriors because I always felt it looked ridiculous, with the brush strokes or gloppy application.  I was so much happier when I finally moved up to rattle cans.  At last, I could finally get a nice, smooth, even finish.

I have no desire to go back to the dimestore kits I used buy as a child, with my allowance.  I have a job and when I have the disposable income, I'll buy a nice kit.  But I won't buy a $3 POS just because I want a model.

-Fred

 

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
X = Kit Choice +Age ?
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Tuesday, April 6, 2010 3:28 PM

I recently purchased a few kits I would never have purchased in my younger days because they didn't interest me.

At the beginning of my participation in this hobby,  I regularly purchased Airfix and Aurora ship and aircraft kits with a few Aurora tank kits.

Later, I purchased AMT and MPC Sci-Fi kits and Monogram 1/48th aircraft kits.

I have some 21st Century kits for "practice" in order to re-gain my skills without the risk of mucking up a very expensive  "good" kit.

Now I find I'm purchasing more AMT and Revell /Monogram  re-issue "funny" kits.

I can account for the Sci-Fi due to the influence of movies and the pantoffelkino ( TV ): Space 1999, Star Trek and later Star Wars- as well as ending purchases due to really bad kits.

As for 1970s and 1980s Monogram- I've commented about that in an earlier thread.

My present purchases are due in part due to the "rivet counting" associated with the serious side of kit building I experienced during my IPMS days.

I now find I have less interest in dumping a lot of time into "perfection" and more interest in re-gaining the fun I used to experience.

Anyone out there else experiencing the same thing?

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.