72nd scale guys--advice on switching to this scale?

Putsie

I like 1/72.

When I got back into modeling after college I began with 1/32.  Great for detailing, but display and storage is a consideration.  After a year or so I went to 1/72.  Several considerations:  Greater selection of subjects. Its fun to put a Sopwith Camel under the wing of a B-36, and the XF-85 does well there also.  I like the visual perspective of having the Vimy, B-10, B-17, B-24, B-29 all the way to the B-52, Vulcan and B-2 on a long shelf.  Same with fighter comparison.  A T-bolt dwarfs an Me-109, and put an F-86 next to an F-22. You get the idea.  Its also the "Time Line" of history spanning the Wright Brothers up to today. I find that particularly interesting.  Display and storage is easier. I detail as much now as in the past (maybe more because I'm better at it) and the advent of resin conversion and phot-etched detail sets makes its easier.  Yes the amount of extra detailing is limited when compared to larger scales, but 1/72 works for me.

 

Very well said, Putsie, lots of sound information in just a few words. Thanks for the post.

Patrick

I like 1/72.

When I got back into modeling after college I began with 1/32.  Great for detailing, but display and storage is a consideration.  After a year or so I went to 1/72.  Several considerations:  Greater selection of subjects. Its fun to put a Sopwith Camel under the wing of a B-36, and the XF-85 does well there also.  I like the visual perspective of having the Vimy, B-10, B-17, B-24, B-29 all the way to the B-52, Vulcan and B-2 on a long shelf.  Same with fighter comparison.  A T-bolt dwarfs an Me-109, and put an F-86 next to an F-22. You get the idea.  Its also the "Time Line" of history spanning the Wright Brothers up to today. I find that particularly interesting.  Display and storage is easier. I detail as much now as in the past (maybe more because I'm better at it) and the advent of resin conversion and phot-etched detail sets makes its easier.  Yes the amount of extra detailing is limited when compared to larger scales, but 1/72 works for me.

Dragon has released some exceptional armor kits in 1/72 at reasonable prices. 

Terry

Well it's obvious that TGuy is not too impressed by the smaller scale and that is perfectly fine. We all have our preferences but please do not say that 1/72 scale models don't pack the same detail as the larger scales. I have seen some 1/72 scale builds that are works of art and yes, it's hard to believe it's 1/72 scale because of the incredible tiny details packed into the model. 

My 1/144 Type VII/C has as many details as the same U Boat in a larger scale. It has extensive brass pe parts including metal barrels, periscopes, railings and tons of details on the deck gun and bridge. 

Like Bish said, it's up to the individual builder to make or break the details.

And none of my 1/72 builds are thrown together by the way.

 

TomcatGuy

Sure, there are great 1/72 builds out there, but most are pretty uninspiring in my experience. The "I can't believe it's 1/72" comments are almost always hollow attaboys.

 

The same could be said about kits of any scale. What makes a build inspiring is not the kit but what the builder puts into it. I would not say those comments are holow, bt i have never understood them because as i said before, without a point of referance there is often no way on knowing from pics of the completed build alone.

TomcatGuy

After about 5 years back in the hobby I've got about 20 completed.

I don't really measure success in output. I like more complex and involved builds. Id rather dedicate shelf space to 1 all out 1/32 F-14 than 10 1/72 builds that are thrown together. Presence always wins for me.

 

Well, kits are only thrown together if the builder chooses to and that could happen in any scale. Of course people can choose which ever scale they wish, and its nice to see kits of all scales colours and type. I often see comments on here by people who say they can't believe a kit is 1/72nd scale. And on other occasions i have seen kits where the poster did not give all the kit details and i often have to ask what scale it is. In pics, it is usually hard to tell what scale a build is without a point of referance.

Of course, on the shelf, its a bit differant. But i do think somtimes people are dismissive of 72nd without appreciating the effort and detail that can go into them. My longest aircrfat build was 3 months, i would not call that thrown together as i don't consider myself a slow builder by any means.

My 72nd kits are hopefully considered reasonably well built, as opposed to "thrown together." How 'bout the rest of you 72nd builders, do you just "throw" yours together?

Really, Tomcat, that's a rather wholesale dismissal of the preferred scale, and skills, of other members. 

Patrick 

After about 5 years back in the hobby I've got about 20 completed.

I don't really measure success in output. I like more complex and involved builds. Id rather dedicate shelf space to 1 all out 1/32 F-14 than 10 1/72 builds that are thrown together. Presence always wins for me.

I agree.  Modern aircraft are bigger than those of ww2.  Kitts are better and space is an issue.  Some aftermarket figures like PJ Productions are very good. 

For some time I preferred 48th and 32nd, but for anything I might like to keep? 72nd. That scale is so much more compact for display, can be detailed to a very pleasing degree, the newer kits are really well produced, accurate and cost friendly. 

I agree with others, it is really a good representation of the actual aircraft allowing sufficient details, while requiring far less space for both building and "showing off."

My .02

Patrick

TomcatGuy

Replace the 7 with a 3. 1/32. Never look back. It's been awesome for me. Better detail, more presence, bigger more satisfying projects. How can you loose?

 

How many built models do you have?  I have lots, probably fifty or sixty, and maybe a dozen ships.  That is why I am going to 1:72 and 1:144 aircraft, 1:700 ships.  Yeah, I love building big 1:32 or even 1:24 aircraft.  But I now have no place to put them when I am finished.

Replace the 7 with a 3. 1/32. Never look back. It's been awesome for me. Better detail, more presence, bigger more satisfying projects. How can you loose?

im really diggin' the new line form airfix. Superb models oob, and with plenty of room for those who wish to super-detail!

I switched (generally speaking) to 1/72 and have no regrets. 

1/48 seems HUGE now, and I have very little desire to tap back into the 48th stash.

As with all scales/manufacturers...detail/quality is hit-r-miss. Most of the newer stuff from Tamiya, Revell, Airfix is great and consistant...Hobby Boss seems to have different design teams on their kits, some great with great detail...others are just completely lacking. A little Googling will give you all you need to know when picking a particular subject(same as it ever was!!!)

though now they r coming out with more vehicles in 48th the selection in not good yet

you can make great diorams in 72nd cause of the better selection of vehicles to go with the aircraft

I'm mostly a 1/48 and 1/32  aircraft  and 1/35 armor builder but recently I have accidentally started dealing in some 1/72 scale subjects and have made me a true believer that great details are not limited to larger scales. Take the Hasegawa 1/48 Tomcats as an example. They have outstanding details but then, so does their  1/72 cats and are basically scaled down versions of their bigger 1/48 brother.

I still like the larger scales but once in a while, a 1/72 scale plane comes along that is simply outstanding.

As for armor, I stay at 1/35 as a personal prefference. 

OH NO! thinking of going to OTS (One True Scale).

i suggest going to the Group builds forum and looking for the 2015 OTS GB and the 2014 Braille Scale GB. Full disclosure i host both of them but you will see some of the kits available and recognize some names of those who build in other scales as well. there are some 1/72 RR builds in the RR GB too.

i got into it a bit over 2 years ago because there was some JGSDF and Bundeswehr vehicles and the russian SS-25 ICBM not done in 1/35 and i like doing RR stuff. as Bish mentioned, figures are an issue. the only styrene ones i have seen are the gun crews for the Toxso cannon. fortunately my friend doesn't do figures so i get his. i have done well at local and regional contetsts with my OTS builds.

I would certainly give 1/72 aircraft a try. I've been a fan for a long time. I happen to like big aircraft alot, probably because I was an airline brat. To the point where I sometimes consider 1/144. But I am not a WW2 fighter fan.

So if B-17s or English Electric Canberras are your thing, 1/72 is great. But a bf-109 would probably be a disappointment to you.

 

Or not.

 

I love the scale.

72nd scale has certainly improved in the last few years. As with anything else it varies, but generally from the top brands the detail is more than passable and if you want to add more there is plenty of it. I build diorama's and figures are vital. This is one are where it really depends on what you building. I mainly build WW2 German and this is the area that is covered the best, but even there are shortcomings particularly in ground crew. There are some good modern US sets, especially from Hasegawa. I never dropped down so its hard for me to say. I did recently build my first 32nd kit and while that was nice, going back to a 72nd was like coming home. Yes, parts are smaller, but for me its what I am used to. For those dropping down I guess its just a case of adjusting.

New molding technology has given a big boost to 1:72.  Airfix in particular has recently released some new kits with astounding cockpit detail yet quite reasonable prices.  Their P-51 and their A4 are really great.  Tamiya has a beautiful Zero out.