Having been in exile for a few days I was reviewing my discussions and decided to share some, in all likelihood, self evident observations about our hobby. I'll use my personal experiences but believe the practice is universal regardless of one's interests. I consider myself to be an avid, if not prolific reader, I'll read just about anything but emphasize history. My interest in history leads me to military history, history being conflict driven, and the fact that I grew up in the after-glow of the greatest generation and their accomplishments.
My interest in modeling coincides with military history. So I choose an era, WW2 say. Now I choose a subject, say tanks, what country,what version,what theatre,what campaign,etc. My reading research leads me down a path to micro history, Heinz Guderian, Rommel, Patton, Zhukov, El Alamein,Arracourt or The Bulge. I recently dipped into my resources for a post on locating the bodies of the 7th Calvary which lead me to seriously consider dioramas in the near future and what they would entail. My building kits leads me into wanting to take pictures, good ones, and so into photograpy: cameras,lenses,lighting,iso.... I won't even go into tools,techniques,and implements.
I have also discovered deficiencies, and a case in point, if you don't mind me singling out a member, came about on a post from Bish and his AR555. Having seen the box art I, unconsciously, had no interest in it. Upon seeing the finished product I realized that Bish SAW what it could be and I lack that left brain abstract perception that seems innate to artists and musicians. It will cause me to try and stretch my imagination a little further in all things.
While I will build anything I have a greater affinity for ships and my method of madness in this category lead me to obtain the USS New Jersey ( most decorated), the Dreadnought ( first modern battleship), Yamato ( biggest), Constitution( enough said) PT109 (duh), Virginia ( first ironclad), The Fletcher (class type) and the Indianapolis ( the story).
One more and I'll leave you alone. Kits. A data base would be ideal, but impracticable, for kits that are 'dogs'.I don't believe that I have ever read a bad review on line and wonder if there are incentives that drive these reviewers, but is there a general consensus amongst the more experienced ( read: older than me) members on kits or manufacturers that should be avoided at all costs? Just curious.