You make a good point but I do understand why these decisions have to be made sometimes. I don’t think the entire OOB category should be elminated but the rules may needs to have a bit finer tooth put on them. So here is another log on the fire.
Take a person the builds an Accurate Miniature Yak 1 according to the IPMS OOB rules. Now later on a guy buys the same kit, from the same molds, but it is in an Eduard box and has some nice painted PE detail for the cockpit. He’s gonna build it “OOB” as well. The first guy is gonna make a stink because he may feel guy #2 has an unfair advantage only because he bought his kit some months… or years… later, and has extra detail in the pit.
I am curious as to the opinion of what I did on my P-59. http://wingnutmodels.com/P-59%20Airacomet.html It is 100% OOB, and I have proof, but it is absolutely in conflict with the rules. (Must have missed that part when I read ‘em)
To me the idea of OOB is so little Johnny, who does not have the money for massive amounts of AM stuff, or the skill, yet or to scratch build detail regardless of where the plastic comes from, has the opportunity to place a model next to one built by somebody with years of experience or limitless funds and say, “OK here what I did with the EXACT same 72 parts. Who did I do?”