SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

This may be a loaded question, but I am looking for an honest opinion...1/72 or 1/48

3062 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Sacramento
This may be a loaded question, but I am looking for an honest opinion...1/72 or 1/48
Posted by Redfinger on Friday, April 27, 2007 3:17 AM

Ok so I have built a few models in various scales, and I just purchased a few of the Star Wars Finemolds that are in 1/72 scale......I have found that fine molds offers excellent detail.  I thought it would be cool to have all my models in the same scale, weather it is a WW II p-51 or luck skywalkers x-wing, by having the same scale it makes comparing kinda fun!

 

So besides the obvious, smaller scale, perhaps harder to work with, what are some of the pro's and con's of going 1/48 over 1/72?  Are more acecsories avilable in 1/48?

 

Just looking for a bit of advice,

 

Ashton

Redmodeling Visit my website!
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Fort Knox
Posted by Rob Gronovius on Friday, April 27, 2007 7:18 AM

1/72 scale is probably the most prolific scale for aircraft and since there are ships, tanks and spacecraft in that scale, it would be the most universal scale for a modeler wanting to stick to one scale.

1/48 has fewer options for non-aircraft kits. Armor has begun to re-emerge in the 1/48 scale field and there are some sci-fi kits, but that's about it.

I'm not going to get into the debate about which kits are better, have more detail or whatever. I think 1/72 scale just haves more commonality between genres.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Abbotsford, B.C. Canada
Posted by DrewH on Friday, April 27, 2007 10:17 AM

INCOMMING!!Tongue [:P]

Nah, it's not a loaded question. It's a matter of personal preferance. Rob hit the nail on the head, selection. 72 scale by far has the farthest reaching selection availible including some of the more obscure subjects. 1/48 is mainly an aircraft scale. There are fewer detail items availible for 1/72, but it is growing. 72 scale is also known to be cheaper for it's kits while having similar external detail to 48 scale. Most 'lack of detail' would come in the interiors which are very hard to see into anyways. So there's no real loss there in my opinion.

Good luck with your decisionBig Smile [:D]

Take this plastic and model it!
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Left forever
Posted by Bgrigg on Friday, April 27, 2007 10:27 AM
I'll throw in my preference for 1:48 aircraft. My old eyes and fumbly fingers just don't work well with smaller scales, and since I don't have space for 1:32, 1:48 rules!

So long folks!

  • Member since
    January 2007
Posted by IYAAYAS on Friday, April 27, 2007 10:57 AM

1/72 if you are looking for variety...no question!

1/48 lots of A/C, but limited Armor

1/35 (1/32) lots of Armor limited A/C

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Sacramento
Posted by Redfinger on Friday, April 27, 2007 2:40 PM

Thanks everyone for all of your input!!  As for now I think I will stay w/ the 1/72 scale for the majority of my projects unless of course I find the inevitable 1/32, or 1/48 that I just gotta have! ;)

 

Thanks again guys!!


Ashton

Redmodeling Visit my website!
  • Member since
    July 2013
Posted by DURR on Friday, April 27, 2007 4:05 PM

storing is an important issue for many  people

as a builder of any scale anything

in model aircraft as an example

i will say this single eng aircraft i like 1/48th  multi eng  i like 1/72

jwb
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Parkton, NC
Posted by jwb on Wednesday, May 2, 2007 8:04 PM

 Bgrigg wrote:
I'll throw in my preference for 1:48 aircraft. My old eyes and fumbly fingers just don't work well with smaller scales, and since I don't have space for 1:32, 1:48 rules!

Sign - Ditto [#ditto]

I started back into the hobby in 1/72 scale aircraft, but I realized that after 23 years out of the hobby, my eyes were not as sharp, my coordination not as fine, and despite the ease of storage.... I made the switch to 1/48 to spare my eyes.

I just recently built a couple of 1/72 kits again, and enjoyed it. But I did not go into much cockpit detail. I figure if I can't see it- why worry? Propeller [8-]

Jon Bius

AgapeModels.com- Modeling with a Higher purpose

"For I know the plans I have for you," declares the Lord, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future." ~ Jeremiah 29:11

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Fort Knox
Posted by Rob Gronovius on Friday, May 4, 2007 6:29 AM
 Wirraway wrote:

And whats with 1/144 scale ?  Ok if you're  building a C-5 or an An-124..... but sheesh !

(God I hope cassibill isnt reading this)

It is a common airliner scale.
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Pineapple Country, Queensland, Australia
Posted by Wirraway on Friday, May 4, 2007 11:36 PM

It is a common airliner scale.   Granted.  And if you are going to make the really large aircraft, its 1:144 or 1:200 or even 1:300.  But I cant see the point in making, say, a WW2 fighter in 1:144 scale - they're tiny !  The detail would be practically non-existant, and, to my way of thinking, its the detail that separates "models" from "toys"

(Now I'm really going before Cassibill gets here !)

PS:  sorry for hijacking the thread - no more Sign - Off Topic!! [#offtopic] from me.

"Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional"

" A hobby should pass the time - not fill it"  -Norman Bates

 

GIF animations generator gifup.com

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Fort Knox
Posted by Rob Gronovius on Saturday, May 5, 2007 7:30 AM

Have you seen the photo etched detail sets for 1:350 scale aircraft? You'd be amazed at the look of those tiny planes. They are for aircraft carrier decks.

jwb
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Parkton, NC
Posted by jwb on Saturday, May 5, 2007 7:56 AM
 Wirraway wrote:

  But I cant see the point in making, say, a WW2 fighter in 1:144 scale - they're tiny !  The detail would be practically non-existant, and, to my way of thinking, its the detail that separates "models" from "toys"

Take a look at this. Amazing work- only made more difficult by the scale.

Now I wouldn't even attempt it.... I couldn't see stuff at that size.Wink [;)] 

Jon Bius

AgapeModels.com- Modeling with a Higher purpose

"For I know the plans I have for you," declares the Lord, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future." ~ Jeremiah 29:11

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: NYC, USA
Posted by waikong on Monday, May 7, 2007 12:41 PM
Personally, I like 1/48 just because it's a good compromise between size/price/details and my skill. Like Jim pointed out with WingNut's 1/144 fw190, some guys can do things in a scale smaller than my and add way more details. So its not the scale, but that personal balance of size/price/details/skill.

My website: http://waihobbies.wkhc.net

   

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 17, 2007 7:39 PM

There's more than one way to skin a cat, people.  The bottom line regarding scale is that it's whatever makes you happy.  End of sentence, next paragraph.

 BUT since the question was asked, let me throw this into the mix:  Early aircraft, WW-I, biplanes and between the war can be modeled in either 1/48 or 1/32 and either looks great.  To me, 1/72 for those types requires an OptiVisor and occasionally a microscope to be able to see the detail. Beyond that, have you tried rigging a Bristol Boxkite in 1/72?

From WW-II on, it's basically a question of your preference and available space.  There's also the matter of practicality.  A 1/32 B-36, for example, would have an 86 1/4" wingspan.  Build an Airbus A380 to the same scale and you'll need to build a garage to house it.  As a result, consider different scales for different aircraft types.  

Armor is probably best modeled in 1/35, in large part because of the extensive selection.  Railroad modelers, of course, have a slew of 1/87 scale armor available.

As for science fiction, I don't know that it's possible to have a standard scale.  For example, consider the size of a Babylon 5 habitat in even 1/72 scale. The 'real' thing is 5 miles long (I think), which would make a 1/72 scale model nearly 31 feet in length. That pretty much eliminates the idea of constant scale where science fiction is concerned.

As I said in the beginning, the bottom line is that it's your choice.  Besides, every last one of us will build something that's outside of our preferred if it's a subject we've been lusting over and it's the only kit made. 

That's my two cents for what it's worth.  Or considering the length of this post, two dollars worth. 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Fort Knox
Posted by Rob Gronovius on Friday, May 18, 2007 9:45 AM

The point most people are missing is that the original poster was looking for a scale so that he could have models of different genres (aircraft, armor, sci-fi, ships, etc.) all in the same scale.

I agree that the best scale for individual genres is based on industry standards. But if you want a common scale for the majority of your kits, 1/72 scale has the most to chose from. It is a standard aircraft scale, the second most common armor scale, and has a good selection of sci-fi and ship models available.

There are multiple downsides to the scale such as smallness, lack of detail compared to a larger scale, limited selection for some areas (ships or cars), but overall there are more cross-genre kits in this scale than any other.

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Sacramento
Posted by Redfinger on Friday, May 18, 2007 12:22 PM

Lots of good information here! Thanks guys!

 

AShton

Redmodeling Visit my website!
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.