I did some conversions to metric since I lack an English ruler marked in tenths, and here is what I found:
LAU-68 7-shot rocket pod:
Par429's info: 58.9"
conversion: 58.9 in X 2.54cm/in = 149.6cm, or approximately 1.5m
M260 7-shot rocket pod:
Par429's info: 66.2"
conversion: 66.2 in X 2.54cm/in = 168.1cm, or approximately 1.68m
That leaves a real-life difference of .18m between the pods,
.18m = 180mm, 180mm / 35 (scale) = approximately
5.1mm difference between the pods in 1/35th scale.
My actual measurements:
LAU-68 from MRC's AH-1W kit: 39.0mm.......(converts to 1.36m real-life)
LAU-68 from Cobra Company's UH-1N Weapons set: 38.5mm.....(1.35m real-life)
M260 from Dragon's AH-6J: 49.5mm.....(1.73m real-life)
49.5mm -- 39.0mm =
10.5mm difference in 1/35 scale!
That leaves a real-life difference between these model pods of 0.375m, which is almost exactly double the difference in length from the measurements that Par429 quoted (0.19m).
What does this say? Again, assuming that all of Par429's quotes are correct, this leaves our scale LAU-68's on the short side (a little over 3mm), while Dragon's M260 is 1.5mm too long. So I guess this means that the -68's we have are more mis-scaled than Dragon's M260!? In any case, their combined inaccuracies account for the noticable difference when layed side-by-side. Still -- to me, at least -- the rocket pods from the AH-1W kit and Cobra Company just look "right," lol. But since my only experiences have been with LAU-68 pods, I can't make a good comparison in my mind, as I have never seen the Army's M260's.
Take this for what it's worth, I hate to think that I am becoming a rivet-counter, but as Par429 said, if we're all firing the same rockets, the differences in pods shouldn't be that great -- which is why the difference in length between my kit pods just looked odd to me.