SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

taking rotorcraft to the next level.....

874 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2005
taking rotorcraft to the next level.....
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 5, 2005 3:32 PM
Boeing A160 Hummingbird completes flight test

By Doug Kinneard

Ship 4 of the Boeing A160 Hummingbird unmanned rotorcraft program made its first test flight Wednesday from an airfield near Victorville, Calif., as Boeing continues to demonstrate the unprecedented range, endurance, payload and altitude capabilities of this unmanned air vehicle.

"This flight – the first with a six-cylinder Subaru engine – is an important step toward concept demonstration of this innovative UAV to offer unprecedented capabilities in the history of helicopters," said Gary Gallagher, A160 program manager for Boeing Phantom Works.

"It's gratifying to resume flight testing, as the A160 team does a great job with this new technology," Gallagher continued. "This aircraft can change all the rules as they apply to UAV vertical takeoff and landing operations."

The new A160 successfully flew for about 30 minutes in the vicinity of the airfield, bringing the total number of A160 test flights to 32 and the total number of flight hours to 58.

The objectives of the test included opening the A160's flight envelope for the latest vehicle configuration – previous aircraft used four-cylinder Subaru engines. Engineers are currently analyzing the flight data in preparation for the next series of test flights.

The Hummingbird features a unique optimum speed rotor technology that significantly improves overall performance efficiency by adjusting the RPM of the rotor system at different altitudes, gross weights and cruise speeds. It is designed to fly autonomously, for much longer periods of time (in excess of 24 hours), over greater distances (2,500-plus nautical miles/4,630-plus kilometers), at higher altitudes (up to 30,000 feet/9,144 meters) and much more quietly than current helicopters.

The A160 could provide reconnaissance, surveillance, target acquisition, communication relay and precision re-supply. The A160 Hummingbird is being developed and tested by Phantom Works under contract with the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Phantom Works currently is under contract for eight A160 UAVs for DARPA and 10 for Naval Air Systems Command.

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Aaaaah.... Alpha Apaches... A beautiful thing!
Posted by Cobrahistorian on Monday, December 5, 2005 8:13 PM

BOO HISS!!!

Damn robots tryin to take our jobs!  Neat technology, but you'll never replace a pair of eyeballs directly on the target.

"1-6 is in hot"
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 7, 2005 11:00 AM

I know pilots don't like drones......but politicians do.  Just ask that one recently dead al qaeda dude that just got smoked in pakistan by a predator and a hellfire.......

I was actually more excited about the aerodynamic  (range and performance) numbers this rotorcraft is putting up.........you replace the weight of the crew with mission equipment and fuel and you break rotorcraft records.....

remember I'm a crew station designer......nothing I'd rather work on that crew stations and accomodations.........we'll never replace piloted aircraft, but you have to admit the numbers and achievements are impressive to date......

  • Member since
    November 2004
Posted by DPD1 on Thursday, December 8, 2005 12:26 PM
The politicians do, but it might depend on who's doing the study... I've read studies that show, if you include all the support stuff that's needed on the ground, they aren't as affordable as they originally make them out to be. I think there's a use for both. Then on the other hand... I believe it was the Op. Anaconda incident... where a couple different sections of aircraft tried to take out the bunker that had the guys pinned down, and failed. Then a single missile from a Predator got it. The manned aircraft didn't come out looking too good on that one.

Dave
-DPD Productions - Featuring the NEW 'Military Aircraft' Photo CD -
http://eje.railfan.net/dpdp/
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Screaminhelo on Monday, December 12, 2005 9:52 AM

 DPD1 wrote:
I think there's a use for both. Then on the other hand... I believe it was the Op. Anaconda incident... where a couple different sections of aircraft tried to take out the bunker that had the guys pinned down, and failed. Then a single missile from a Predator got it. The manned aircraft didn't come out looking too good on that one.

My 2 cents [2c]
Sometimes an unmanned aircraft will be the best utillization of resources, especially if you are dealing with a clear target.  If the target is not well defined or you are dealing with a fluid situation such as close air support, you need a manned aircraft on station. 

I think that UAVs are a great asset for many recon missions and certian exterem high risk missions.  People are the greatest asset that the U.S. military has and using unmanned aircraft in some situatuions in order to reduce the risk to them is the way to go.

Mac

Mac

I Didn't do it!!!

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.