SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

The worst kit, in the world, Ever.

1178 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: California
The worst kit, in the world, Ever.
Posted by Manic Moran on Sunday, February 26, 2006 1:13 AM

I'm not kidding.

The Revell EC-135 in 1/72. Really, the astonishing lack of fit is amazing. That I managed to salvage anything from it at all, even after multiple cubic centimeters of filler, is a feat. All the individual components are great. Good, crisp detail. Excellent decals. They just don't bloody fit together!!!

I was doing well enough until I decided to experiment a bit with Future (never used it before: I usually make tanks, not much call for glosscoat) and panel lines. (Ditto lack of panel lines on tanks). Oh well.

Decals by MaxDecals. Very good to work with, but sadly transluscent.

NTM

The difference between infantrymen and cavalrymen is that cavalrymen die faster for we ride into battle!

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Singapore
Posted by albert_sy2 on Sunday, February 26, 2006 4:32 AM
I share your pain. I am building the Tamiya 1:48 F-15J and I've used up a horrendous amount of filler on the intakes and forward fuselage.
Groovy baby
  • Member since
    July 2013
Posted by DURR on Sunday, February 26, 2006 7:46 AM

i too feel your pain i have the same problems with a revell skycrane some parts are warped

but you did a great job on this  the final result is awsomeBig Smile [:D]

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Green Lantern Corps HQ on Oa
Posted by LemonJello on Sunday, February 26, 2006 10:47 AM
I don't know, you seem to have gotten a pretty good end result from the materiels you were given.  I'll even give you bonus points for working in 1/72.  That's a scale that I have sworn off forever, as it makes my eyes itch and burn just to think of all those tiny parts and my big, clumsy fingers.
A day in the Corps is like a day on the farm; every meal is a banquet, every paycheck a fortune, every formation a parade... The Marine Corps is a department of the Navy? Yeah...The Men's Department.
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: bc,canada
Posted by gdarwin on Sunday, February 26, 2006 12:04 PM
Big Smile [:D] well guys the kit im building is from Glencoe,its a McDonnell xv-1 convertiplane 1;32 scale and i had to use alot of glue to make it go toether a real pain,and im still not done.Sad [:(]
airborne death from above http://photobucket.com/albums/a350/roygd/
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Plumas Lake, Ca
Posted by NASA 736 on Sunday, February 26, 2006 1:44 PM
I don't know, you must build a heck've a tank cause this thing is pretty good! (I am like wise a member of the "1/72 challenged" community)
Able Audacious Army Aviation Above All!
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: California
Posted by Manic Moran on Sunday, February 26, 2006 7:12 PM

 NASA 736 wrote:
I don't know, you must build a heck've a tank cause this thing is pretty good! (I am like wise a member of the "1/72 challenged" community)

http://www.finescale.com/FSM/CS/forums/1/448373/ShowPost.aspx#448373

NTM

The difference between infantrymen and cavalrymen is that cavalrymen die faster for we ride into battle!

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, February 27, 2006 1:18 AM
Good save. Looks great.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, February 27, 2006 5:06 AM

Come on Moran, my best kit ever looks a whole lot worse than your EC135!!!Wow!! [wow]

I was relieved to read your post: I always thought I did something very wrong with the 1:72 EC135. I've built six of them and the last one hardly came out any better than the first. Besides the poor fit of the fuselage halves, EMS interior and exhausts, I keep having major problems with the windows; they fit like s#8@!

Another worst kit ever, although a rather obscure one: A-Model's 1:72  Ka226. The plastic is as thick as the plating on a 1:1 T34, the EMS interior is big enough for a 1:32 crew to have comfortable sex on and detail on a 1:700- kit is better than on this piece of heavy industry.

Cheers, Gertjan

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, February 27, 2006 5:16 AM
That looks awesome.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: California
Posted by Manic Moran on Monday, February 27, 2006 9:57 AM
 GeejeeZ wrote:

I was relieved to read your post: I always thought I did something very wrong with the 1:72 EC135. I've built six of them and the last one hardly came out any better than the first. Besides the poor fit of the fuselage halves, EMS interior and exhausts, I keep having major problems with the windows; they fit like s#8@!

Tell me about it. I did manage to get them in place at one point, but some time after I had the two fuselage halves glued and sanded, stress must have popped one of the sides a little out again. They're still in place, but visibly recesses.

The way I consider the kit, it's a beauty in the box. The stock decals are numerous, in register, and great, there's little flash, no sink holes, the details are crisp and fine, down to the different types of seat belts on the different seats. The problem is that for some reason, they made all the parts different scales. You have a 1/73 fuselage. 1/72 interior. 1/71 canopy. And so on. I never was able to get the canopy top flush with the fuselage roof, best I could do was to create a 'ramp' so that it at least looked like it was supposed to be like that.

NTM

The difference between infantrymen and cavalrymen is that cavalrymen die faster for we ride into battle!

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.