According to the information and knowledge I have I would have to say yes. I have experience on the UH-1, UH-60, OH-58 and MD-500 series aircraft and all of them have a blade twist designed in. To the best of my knowledge it is a design necessity. The result of an untwisted blade is a MUCH higher lift difference at the blade tip than at the root. Speed at any point on the blade varies with the radius or distance the blade is from the center of the main rotor shaft (mast). The result is an extreme speed differential between the blade tip and root. However, the lift differential between the blade tip and root is even greater because lift varies with the square of speed. When speed doubles, lift increases four times. If the blade were not twisted to decrease the lift toward the tip end of the blade the coning of the blades would be extremely high when weight is applied to the system. The structure of the blades would have to be so strong (translated to so heavy) to prevent structural failure, they would be inefficient to use.
I like your idea about the razor saw. I'll try using it on a UH-1H diorama I'm working on. Some of the kits in my collection have the twist molded in or are molded in such a way that when the blades are mounted you can build in any pitch setting you want. If you really want total accuracy make sure you adjust the positions of the swashplates and pitch change links as well depending on the aircraft you are building.
Hope I didn't bore you with part 2 of the daily aerodynamics lesson.
Keep it fun!