SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Interesting ACH-47 pic

7792 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2013
Posted by intruder_bass on Friday, May 2, 2008 7:47 PM

   Frank,

 Thank you very much for great pics and for all the info. Very interesting indeed!

 Really apritiate what you are doing!

 

Andy

 

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: SE Alabama
Posted by Retired Gunpilot on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 7:00 PM

Beautiful images. I bet it vibrated every rivet loose in that platform. Big Smile [:D]

Charlie

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Piedmont Triad, NC (USA)
Posted by oldhooker on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 1:49 PM

Ray,

Wow, I bet that was one HEAVY Huey after the ammo was loaded on!! Great pictures, thanks!! Smile [:)]

Ray, Jon and all...

 Here's another picture of #145 during her evaluation flights, carrying the minigun pod...

In addition (in the event you'd like to see the real #145 in flight), here's a short .MOV file of #145 during rocket pod (2.75in FFAR) ejection testing at Edwards AFB, 1966.....  http://gunsagogo.org/rocketpodtest.MOV 

I don't have the original of the pic you posted... (but Steve Maxham does) Wink [;)]    

Also, here are some originals (much better detail) of three photos on the website that show a very rare shot #145 in theatre when she carried the *proposed* name of "Crazy 8".      http://gunsagogo.org/crazyeight.jpg

http://gunsagogo.org/crazyeight2.jpg

http://gunsagogo.org/crazyeight3.jpg

(This was eventually changed to "Co$t of Living", but at the time of her crash she carried no name on her side.)      The FE & CE who were involved in her naming were KIA on 5 May 67, so the real "what it was officially called" story will never be known.      Around 10 hours after this photo was made, #145 and her Crew were gone.

*

Take care,

Frank

Andy... A "what-if"... maybe? Wink [;)] ... 

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Auburn, Alabama
Posted by rotorwash on Monday, April 28, 2008 11:40 PM

Charlie,

  How about twin 30mm cannons ona UH-1C! Check out the XM-140:

Photobucket[img]http://Photobucket[img]http://Photobucket[img]http://Photobucket[

Here's the system with the fairing removed:

[img]http://Photobucket" border="0" />

And yes they DID fire it:

[img]http://Photobucket

My personal favorite Huey configuration!

      Ray
 

 

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: SE Alabama
Posted by Retired Gunpilot on Monday, April 28, 2008 10:13 PM

I remember when we started training in hovering fire with the XM-35 20 mm in the old G's.  When you pulled the trigger the aircraft would start settling if you had more than half a bag of gas. It was really noticeable on hot and humid days. The hovering fire was a real waste of training in my opinion, other than to show what it was like firing with marginal flight control.  You had to watch too much inside and outside the cockpit at the same time you were trying to hit something down range.  I liked it much more in running and diving fire. But there is nothing in helicopters firepower equal to the almighty rumble of the Apache 30mm. You just never get enough trigger time with it.Sigh [sigh]

Charlie

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Modeling anything with "MARINES" on the side.
Posted by AH1Wsnake on Monday, April 28, 2008 12:54 AM

Just thinking out loud here, but swapping out that 7.62mm XM-18 for a XM-35 20mm gatling gun would look really wicked. And you'd definitely have a stand-off penetrator Evil [}:)]

Andy

 

 

"There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and those who have met them in battle. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion."
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Aaaaah.... Alpha Apaches... A beautiful thing!
Posted by Cobrahistorian on Friday, April 25, 2008 2:59 PM

Awesome, thanks Frank!

 Guess I won't be building my GoGo bird with the XM-18 after all!

 

Jon 

"1-6 is in hot"
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Auburn, Alabama
Posted by rotorwash on Friday, April 25, 2008 1:27 PM

Frank,

  I knew we could count on you, sir!  Thanks for the intel.  Do you have the original of this photo?  This one is from the Chinnery Vietnam helo book.

      Thanks,

              Ray
 

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Piedmont Triad, NC (USA)
Posted by oldhooker on Friday, April 25, 2008 10:33 AM
 rotorwash wrote:

This is mainly directed at Frank, but I'll take input from anyone.  Which ship is this?  Is it stateside?  How common was the XM-18 configuration?  Inquiring minds (Jon and I) want to know.  Thanks in advance,

 

Hi Ray, and Jon... Smile [:)]

    That is #64-13145 during it's evaluation flights right after she rolled off the assembly line.     The XM-18 configuration was used on #145 and #149 for publicity photos, but once the team got to evaluate it properly at Ft Benning, they determined the 19rnd FFAR pod was more effective (and a lot less weight) for their mission, and it was never used again.       

    They were looking for a penetrating "Stand-Off"  type weapons system, and the 7.62 ballistic just didn't fit that need.       

    Hope this helps,

    Take care,

    Frank  Smile [:)] 

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Auburn, Alabama
Interesting ACH-47 pic
Posted by rotorwash on Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:15 PM

This is mainly directed at Frank, but I'll take input from anyone.  Which ship is this?  Is it stateside?  How common was the XM-18 configuration?  Inquiring minds (Jon and I) want to know.  Thanks in advance,

        RayPhotobucket" border="0" />
 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.