SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Review of Trumpeter F-105, Jan '04, FSM

2425 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 3, 2003 7:43 PM
Mel
Right you are on your comments about the 1/48th Monogram kit. I built it about five years ago and was very impressed with the details, especially the cockpit. I made that kit for a good friend who flew 200 missions to route pack 6 (in his a/c markings,naturally) and am attempting the same with the Trumpeter.
Tony Ryan
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Lafayette, LA
Posted by Melgyver on Wednesday, December 3, 2003 7:01 PM
Tony,

I agree with your analysis of the kit reviews. Unless it's an indepth build article it's not going to help you out a great deal. The "Thud" in 1/32 scale has been awaited by a lot of folks and after getting an Academy 1/32 F/A-18 it's bound to be let down. I had started a 1/48 Monogram F-105 D and dug it out and noticed my seat is far more detailed. Which is of course up to the individual builder. Like the pilot wore his chute so there shouldn't be a back cushion in the seat. Nothing is a good substitute for good reasearch. Then is up to you to build it like you want. Good luck on your "Thud" kit. I'm sure you will build a winner.

Clear Left!

Mel

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Panama City, Florida, Hurricane Alley
Posted by berny13 on Wednesday, December 3, 2003 6:56 PM
Actually, the review did not tell me any thing I didn't already know. The only useful information I got from it was the problem with the gap in the cockpit. Also the instrument panel problems.

Just looking at the kit, most errors and problems were obvious. The weak landing gear, hidden detail (engine, gun, and weapons bay, and very poor cockpit.

I am sure someone will come out with a resin cockpit. I assume metal gear, detailed dragchute compartment, and PE/resin gun bay will also be released. That will make the total cost of the kit over $200.

Berny

 Phormer Phantom Phixer

On the bench

TF-102A Delta Dagger, 32nd FIS, 54-1370, 1/48 scale. Monogram Pro Modeler with C&H conversion.  

Revell F-4E Phantom II 33rd TFW, 58th TFS, 69-260, 1/32 scale. 

Tamiya F-4D Phantom II, 13th TFS, 66-8711, 1/32 scale.  F-4 Phantom Group Build. 

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 3, 2003 5:45 PM
Thanks for the help, guys. Also have a look at www.aircraftresourcecenter.com Great shots in detail of the Thud, as well as practically every other a/c.
Tony Ryan
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Boise ID
Posted by chasblake99 on Tuesday, December 2, 2003 11:10 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tempestjohnny

Tony check out the IPMS home page. They just did a build of the Thud pretty detailed article check it out www.ipmsusa.com JOHN


Make that
http://www.ipmsusa.org/

Charles  NKAWTG (My KC-135R at RAF Fairfird during Allied Force) Pilots without crew chiefs are nothing but pedestrians with nice sunglasses and a cool jacket. Crew Chiefs RULE!
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Joisey
Posted by John P on Tuesday, December 2, 2003 9:01 PM
I am deeply desireous of a good cockpit set from Cutting Edge for my Wild Weasel. Once I'd gotten the kit cockpit assembled, it just looked pitiful. I couldn't bring myself to put that in this huge kit.

So I wait ...
-------------------------------
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Naples, FL
Posted by tempestjohnny on Tuesday, December 2, 2003 8:40 PM
Tony check out the IPMS home page. They just did a build of the Thud pretty detailed article check it out www.ipmsusa.com JOHN

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Review of Trumpeter F-105, Jan '04, FSM
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 2, 2003 8:00 PM
Folks, I think I need a reality check here: I bought the F-105D kit about two months ago and quickly recognized problem areas. So I have been looking forward to this review to help in the correction of this kit's shortcomings/ problems.
I got to admit that I was very disappointed. Now I will be the first to admit that probably my expectations for the review were unreasonably high. Maybe that says something about all kit reviews: if we're not making the kit, the review is overly-detailed; if we're building it, well, the review is too vague and skimpy.
But given all that, this is not an ordinary, run-of-the-mill kit. This is a long-awaited kit and its price demands one intense, detailed, accurate build. This is a kit that begs for accuracy and detail. May I suggest to FSM that a follow-up review be done, especially once after-market items come out, that will assist us nutcase modelers make a worldbeater.
Tony Ryan
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.