SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

The Flying Prostitute- Monogram B-26 Marauder WIP

37561 views
64 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Northern KY
Posted by mucker on Saturday, June 5, 2010 10:01 PM
I'm picking up on this post late, Hans. I wish you luck. To this day the Revell AG B-26 has been the hardest kit for me. I think I used more putty and epoxy than styrene. That being said, a B-26 on the shelf was a must for me. After all of the crying and cussing, It looks nice on the shelf (from a distance!). i'll be watching your build and cheering you on from afar.

  • Member since
    June 2008
  • From: Iowa
Posted by Hans von Hammer on Sunday, June 6, 2010 9:54 AM

Thanks... Yeah, those cowls are an adult female dog, as is the fit of the stabs...  Not haing built the kit since the 70s, I'd forgotten that it had a few problems... I've never found the 1/48th ESCI kit that came out around that time, so I've no comparison... However, I'm a die-hard Monogram builder, and I still insist that there's no kit from them that's as bad as some folks have purported them to be...  Once Monogram decided to make models instead of toys (Starting with the P-40B), they really set the standard of model kits for others to emulate.. Of course, the others did do that, and surpass, but not at nearly the same price...  I really get a "pang" of nostalgia for them when I look through my old mags from the 80s & 90s and see these same kits at 3.99 and such (I think the B-26 initially came out at around 6.99)...

Anyway, back to the build... I tried something different with the second Maruader, that is to say that I attacked the wing/fuselage joint with a sanding stick... It took very little effort to remove a couple areas that were causing the fit problem and I don't need to add any strip or sprue to fill the joint (it still needs putty and rescribing though not nearly as much)... 

I'm also using the stock rear turret set-up instead of the modified one, and that's gonna save some time, putty, & sanding there, although the fit of canopy section over the tail will need a bit of attention, as it doesn't sit properly on the fuselage edge if you make a tight fit of the rear section.. The situation is reversed if you go for a tight fit on the edge, the rear won't fit right, and sits too far below the rudder and at a rather extreme angle... So the strip will get used in this area to ensure a good canopy/fuselage fit... The other option, since it's a factory setting, is to not use it all and just detail the tail position, leaving the canopy at the side of the aircraft awaiting installation...  I'll use a Thumb-Operated Dual-sided Digital Decision Generator* (TODDGEN) when that time comes...

 

*TODDGEN= Flip a coin

  • Member since
    August 2009
  • From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posted by StreetFightingMan on Sunday, June 6, 2010 9:59 AM

TODDGEN, now there's something you don't hear everyday! lol

-Mike

On the Bench: 1/48 Eduard Avia B-534 Series IV, Cyber Hobby Messerschmidt Bf-109 E-4

  • Member since
    June 2008
  • From: Iowa
Posted by Hans von Hammer on Monday, June 7, 2010 8:14 AM

Heh... Just a quick lesson in Pentagonian...

Like why a sheet-metal screw costs you 2 cents and the Pentagon pays 112.39... For two cents, you get a Hex-head sheet-metal screw..

For 112.39, you get the M-18 All-purpose Cross-Slotted Manually-operated Rotary Inclined-plane Metalic Materials Fastener...

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.