SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

False canopies, whats the point?

752 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Winsted CT
False canopies, whats the point?
Posted by jimz66 on Wednesday, February 11, 2004 1:44 PM
I do not understand the reason for false canopies. I think they look severly out of place.

Why do they use them?
Phantoms rule the skies!!!
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Harrisburg, PA
Posted by Lufbery on Wednesday, February 11, 2004 1:57 PM
To confuse the enemy. It makes it tough for the enemy to know whether a plane is coming or going.

Regards,

-Drew

Build what you like; like what you build.

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, February 11, 2004 1:59 PM
it gives a false clue as to the orientation of the aircraft. anyone trying to fire at it may misjudge their targeting lead, or turn in a dogfight.
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: plopped down in front of this computer.
Posted by eagle334 on Wednesday, February 11, 2004 2:41 PM
In a fight where you are actually close enough to see your enemy, generally a mile or less, you usually only get glimpses of your opponent. Think back to the movie "Top Gun" when they showed the A-4 going by from INSIDE the F-14 not when the chase plane was behind both of them. That gives you an idea of how quick things are moving. The reason for the false canopy is that it can confuse your opponent into thinking you're turning into him, which would make him want to turn away from you, when you are really turning away from, which would make him want to chase you. Even though he may only be indecisive for a couple of seconds it could mean the difference between a letter to your family or a nice shiny red star on the side of your airplane.
Wayners Go Eagles! 334th Fighter Squadron Me and my F-4E <script language="javascript" src="http://www.airfighters.com/phgid_183.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Belgium
Posted by Awood23 on Thursday, February 12, 2004 7:52 PM
ok... in a dog fight false canopies. good idea. but on an A-10?
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v515/Awood23/DarkSideBadge.jpg "your' not trying if your not cheating" "no one ever won a war by dying for his country, he won it by making the other poor bugger die for his" 'never before have so many owed so much to so few" 1/48 Spitfire %80
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, February 12, 2004 9:10 PM
Same concept, except when the gunners on the ground look at it, they don't know its orientation and cannot predict what direction he will bank after a straffing or low level bomb run. I used to work the Hogs. One of teh best aircraft the Air Force has and they want to get rid of it. Nothing can ever replace it.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, February 13, 2004 12:02 AM
Eagle is right on the money with the reason why some planes have false canopies. When my outfit VMFA-(AW) 242 got their factory new F-18D's back in 1990, the painted canopies were on some of them.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Belgium
Posted by Awood23 on Friday, February 13, 2004 1:35 AM
docmcbride: I would loose alot of respect for the AF the day they let go off the hog. Im a ground pounder and personaly owe a hog driver a couple drinks of his choice should I ever find out who was flying the night I called for support. I had expected an apache, cobra or even another nearby ground unit for an assist but in came a hog driver and dropped a canister of napalm right in the pickle barrel effecively elliminating my problem (even if he did singe my eyebrows, thats what I get for wanting to watch :)
Nothing can touch a hog for up close and personal work. Apaches are great in thier element but have a bad habbit of turning into ducks in a turkey shoot from ground fire. I hope the if the AF does finaly get rid of the Hog the Army is smart enough to pick em up and maybe even snag a few of the drivers in the process :) Makes me wonder why the Marines dont fly Hogs... Maybe something to do operating from an aircraft carrier?
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v515/Awood23/DarkSideBadge.jpg "your' not trying if your not cheating" "no one ever won a war by dying for his country, he won it by making the other poor bugger die for his" 'never before have so many owed so much to so few" 1/48 Spitfire %80
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Winsted CT
Posted by jimz66 on Friday, February 13, 2004 8:01 AM
Now that would be sweet if the Navy and Marines used the Hog.
Phantoms rule the skies!!!
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Green Lantern Corps HQ on Oa
Posted by LemonJello on Friday, February 13, 2004 10:51 AM
You'd think that the Warthog would be a good addition to the USMC inventory, it's rough and short field capable, right? Wouldn't it be a good compliment to the Hornets and Widowmakers? Speaking as a former 0311, I wouldn't mind knowing there was a pair of hogs on call for some CAS is things went sour...
A day in the Corps is like a day on the farm; every meal is a banquet, every paycheck a fortune, every formation a parade... The Marine Corps is a department of the Navy? Yeah...The Men's Department.
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.