SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Revell 1/72 Scale US Navy F/A-18F Super Hornet Kit# 04864 OOB review & Buildup

19340 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2012
  • From: Idaho, USA
Revell 1/72 Scale US Navy F/A-18F Super Hornet Kit# 04864 OOB review & Buildup
Posted by Jeff Head on Thursday, April 3, 2014 2:13 PM
My Review and Build of Revell's 1/72 scale Kit #04864,
US Navy, Boeing F/A-18F Super Hornet

Latest Update: April 7, 2014

Introduction and What's in the Box - March 30, 2014, 2013

Introduction:
The US Navy determined in the early 1990s to enhance their F-18 Hornet aircraft. They were very agile and carried significant ordinance for their size, but they were also limited in range, and needed to carry more ordinance, partoilcularly in the Strike at Sea and Fleet defense roles. This was because the F-14B Tomcats that were filling that role, partoicularly the Fleet Defense role, were agining and would be retired, and the F/A-18 C/D Hornets were not capable of replacing them.

As a result, the US NAvy worked with the supplier, mcDonald Dougla and then Boeing who bought them, to develop a larger, more advanced version of the aircraft. This new aircraft was called the Super Hornet. Two variants were proposed, accepted, and developed. The single seat F/A-18E Super Hornet to enhance the single seat F/A-18C Hornet, and the tandem-seat F/A-18F Super Hornet to enhance the F/A-18D Hornet.

The Boeing F/A-18F Super Hornet is the tandem-seat, twin-engine carrier-based multirole fighter that resulted. The F/A-18F is a larger and more advanced derivative of the F/A-18D Hornet. The Super Hornet has an internal 20 mm M61 rotary cannon and can carry air-to-air missiles and air-to-surface weapons. Additional fuel can be carried in up to five external fuel tanks and the aircraft can be configured as an airborne tanker by adding an external air refueling system.

Designed and initially produced by McDonnell Douglas, the Super Hornet first flew in 1995. Full-rate production began in September 1997, after the merger of McDonnell Douglas and Boeing the previous month. The Super Hornet entered service with the United States Navy in 1999, replacing the Grumman F-14 Tomcat, which was retired in 2006, and serves alongside the original Hornet. The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF), which has operated the F/A-18A as its main fighter since 1984, ordered the F/A-18F in 2007 to replace its aging F-111 fleet. RAAF Super Hornets entered service in December 2010.

Since that time, well over 500 aircraft have been built and put into service with the US Navy. Approximately 40% of these are the F/A-18F tandem-seat variety.

After initial fleet integration began, Boeing upgraded to the Block II version of the aircraft, incorporating an improved Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, adopting larger displays, integrating the joint helmet mounted cuing system, and replacing many other avionics systems. The Block II configuration has the avionics and weapons systems that were being developed for the proposed production JSF version of the Boeing X-32 JSF which lost out to the Lockheed F-35 JSF. but the avionics package for the X-32 was deemed superior to existing Super Hornet capabilities and was adopted. As part of the Block II configuration, new-build aircraft received the APG-79 AESA radar beginning in 2005. The block II aircraft are the current in-service aircraft.

In 2007, Boeing stated that a passive Infrared Search and Track (IRST) sensor would be a future option for the Super Hornet. The sensor, mounted in a modified centerline fuel tank, would detect long wave IR emissions for detecting and tracking targets such as other aircraft. The IRST coupled with the AIM-9X Block III Sidewinder missile will allow enemy aircraft to be engaged without disruption from radar jamming.

In early 2008, Boeing discussed the development of a Super Hornet Block III with the U.S. and Australian military, featuring additional stealth capabilities and extended range; a long-term successor is to be developed under the Next Generation Air Dominance program In 2010, Boeing offered international customers the Super Hornet "International Roadmap", which included conformal fuel tanks (CFT), enhanced engines, an enclosed weapons pod (EWP), a next-generation cockpit, a new missile warning system, and an internal infra-red search and track (IRST) system that would replace the externally mounted pod currently in use. The enclosed weapons pods (EWP) are to have four internal stations for munitions; a total of three EWPs could be carried by a single aircraft, housing up to 12 AMRAAMs and 2 Sidewinders. The next-generation cockpit will feature a large 19 in x 11 inch touch-sensitive display.[28]

On 18 May 2009, Lockheed Martin announced its selection by Boeing to conduct the IR sensor's technology development phase. Lockheed Martin was awarded a contract for the IRST in November 2011. As of September 2013, a basic IRST would be fielded in 2016 and a longer-range version in 2019. In 2009, development also commenced on several engine improvements, including greater resistance to foreign object damage, reduced fuel burn rate, and potentially increased thrust of up to 20%.[33][34]

By late 2011, Boeing received a contract from the US Navy to develop a new mission computer for the Super Hornet.

Northrop Grumman and Boeing have self funded a a prototype of the Advanced Super Hornet, which will fulfill the Block III aircraft requriements introduced in 2008. The prototype features a 50% reduction in frontal radar cross-section (RCS), conformal fuel tanks (CFT), and the EWP (Eenclosed Weapons Pod). Features of the Advanced Super Hornet can also be integrated onto the EA-18G Growler; the adoption of CFTs on the EA-18 fleet has been speculated as useful to releasing underwing space and drag margin for the Next Generation Jammer. Flight tests of the Advanced Super Hornet began on 5 August 2013 and continued for three weeks, testing the performance of CFTs, the enclosed weapons pod (EWP), and signature enhancements. In March 2013, the U.S. Navy was considering the widespread adoption of CFTs (conformal fuel tanks) to existing aircraft, which can be retrofited to include the same. This will allow the Super Hornet to carry 3,500 lb (1,600 kg) of additional fuel. Flight testing has demonstrated that the CFTs expands the Super Hornet's combat radius by 260 nautical miles. Production CFTs are expected to weigh only 870 lb.

The Super Hornet is expected to remain the US Navy's premier Air Dominance and heavy attack aircraft for several more decades. The older F-18 Hornets will soon begin to be replaced by the 5th generation stealth F-35C and F-35B STOVL aircraft being currently deployed to the US Navy and US Marines.

The Kit:
There are numerous F/A-18F Super Hornet kits available in 1/72 scale. I had purchased and was plannoing on building one of Hasegawa's kits, but then ran across the Revell kit which I was impressed with. It has more parts, more options, includes a crew ladder, and had detail and quality equal to the Hasegawa aircraft I had already purchased. So I purchased the revell model and ended up selling te new Hasegawa kit on eBay and recouped all of my costs.

This model comes in a typical Revell box which opens on each end, and which contains the various sprues, decals, a instruction booklet within, the parts being in sealed plastic bags, and the decals being covered by a protective sheet.

Revell is a long time model maker whom I bought model kits from as a child fifty years ago. They make a quality product, particularly when onbtaining aircraft models from the Revell Germany plant. This aircraft is from that plant. Altoghter, there are just over 100 parts to the kit.

The kit also includes an excellent decal sheet. You can build either of two aircraft from two seperate US NAvy Strike Aircraft Squadrons. One is aircraft number "106" from the US Navy's VFA-11, Strike FIghter Squadron,the "Red Rippers," based at Naval Air Station Oceana in Virginia Beach, Virginia, or; you can build aircraft number "200" from the US NAvy's VFA-103 Striek Fighter Squadron, the "Jolly Rodgers," also based at Naval Air Station Oceana in Virginia Beach, Virginia. I intend to build the "Jpolly Rodhger," aircraft.

The decals shweet includes aevery conceivable decal fpor the aircraft at this scale and is very well researched and authentic. There are 183 decals on the sheet included with the kit.

The instructions are decent. They provide step by step instructions for the building of the aircraft and the various options. I have seen more intuitive instructions sets. These seem a bit hectic and crowded. Nonetheless, they will suffice just fine and do appear straight forward.

A decent decal and color scheme are included on the last sheets of the instructions for both aircraft, and these, though not in color, or very well done.



   The Build - Initial Painting, Cockpit, and Air Frame Assembly - March 30, 2014, 2013

So, I first cut the attachment points and sprue attachments off of the various parts, leaving only a signle attachemnt for each on the sprue to which it was attached. This helps avoid exccessive touch up painting later. I then painted the various in the various Model Master colors i intend for this aircraft. I used Light Ghost Gray for the lower aircraft and Flint Grey for the uppoer. Engine Gray for the darker cockpit surfaces and Weathered Black for the tires and vertical stabilizors. (This is to go with the VFA-103 Jolly Rodgers Squadron of the US NAvy I intend to depict this aricraft as.) Wheel wells and landing gear are going to be a very light gray for this model, with the missiles I will use flat white with their various stripes in red and blue. Once all of this painting was done, it was time to specifcally start with the cockpit.

The F/A-18F Super Hornet is a dual cockpit aircraft, with the pilot forward and a weapons offcier behind. These two cockpits have a lot of instrumentation to operate the aircraft and its weapons and the Revelle Kit comes with a very decent ejection seat for both that fits into a detailed cockpit including the control sticks and manuevering controls. It also includes some very decent decals for the cockpit surfaces. All in all, for the rear cockpit there were a total of eleven pieces and decals, and forward there were ten pieces and decals:

Once the cockpit was completed I turned my attention to the air intakes. This model has a very decently modeled air intake system which extends, enclosed into the fuselage. The curved surfaces and shape is very accurately portrayed, with the engine fan included on each side back in there...which you would have to use a light to see once the aircraft is completed.

Then I put to the major airframe together, first with the upper and lower fuselage halfs maiting together around the cockpit and the intakes. I saw that the intakes would have to be twisted a little on each side to get them to fit into the upper fuselage, so I put these toigether before the intakes were completely dried onto the lower fuselage. THis allowed me to get them into the full fuselage assembly, whicle keeping their glue "tacky" and allowing them to be pressed back into place after they were manuevered into position. I had to do this seperately for each side.

So, this is going together fairly rapidly. Next I will assemble the landing gear and their doors, the front canopy, and then begin on the weapons.

The Build - Landing Gear, Vertical Stabilzors, Front Canopy, Start Weapons - April 1, 2014

The landing gear are stout as is normal for US NAvy landing gear for carrier aircraft. They are well modled for the fornt gear, which has two wheels, and the main gear where each of those two have one large wheel. After painting and assembling the wheels, and painting and assembling the gear (and this involved some silver for the main light and aluminum for the various shock absorbers, I glued them in place. Then the doors, which come as a single piece for the front and single pieces for each main gera (this is to allow the model to be deicted with the doors closed if desired, had to be cut apart (their are panel line provided) so that each part can be depicted in the proper "open position." All in all they came together well. Let them dry really well (24-48 hours) before having them carry the weight of the aircraft.

Once the gear were added, I then went back and painted the vertical stabilzors for the VFA-103 Jolly Roidgers squadron to which this aircraft will belong. There are very nice decals to add over this balck painting...but more on that later. I then painted and added the fron canpoy to the aircraft



At this point I started on the weapons. I am painting the missiles in the same very light gray I am using for the landing gear bays. Later the proper stripes will be added to each. The aircraft comes with two AGM-88 HARM anti-radiation missiles used to take out enemy radars, two AIM-120 AMRAAM medium to lomng range anti-aircraft warfare missiles, and two AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles for short range anit-air warfare. It also includes three large fuel tanks (one for the centerline beneath the aircraft, and one for each inboard pylon on each wing) to extend the range of the aircraft when attacking enemy targets.

I intend to arm this aircraft with the following:

1 x Large Centerline Fuel Tanks 2 x AGM-84 Harpoon anti-shipping missiles mounted on the inboard pylons on each wing 2 x AGM-88 HARM missile mounted on the center pylon on each wing 2 x AIM-120 AMRAAM Missiles mounted on the outboard pylons on each wing 2 x AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles mounted on each wing tip

This is a very heavy strike at sea weapons load, allowing this particular F/A-18F Super Hornet to be prepared for a full range of threats. I will add the AGM-64 Harpoon missiles in 1/72 scale from one of the Testors, 1/72 Scale, US and NATO weapons sets I have.

In the next session I will assemble the additional weapons, and then use decals or paint to appropriately mark them, and then add them and the large centerline fuel tank to the aircraft.

The Build - Main Canopy, Detailing vertical stabilzors, Centerline Fuel Tank, Weapons, Crew Ladder - April 3, 2014

I began this session by carefully painting the main canopy and then dry fitting it to the aircraft. Make sure you do not smudge that clear canopy. I also prepared a few more parts.

Then, I decided to paint the vetrical stabilzors and add the decals for the VFA-103 Jolly Rodgers Strike Fighter Squadron. Thye have a distinctive black and Yello color scheme with the skull and nbones markings. The decals provided are very good in this regard.

I then painted and added decals to the centerline fuel tank that hangs beneth the fueselage and nestes up between the landing gear doors. This is painted black to match the vertical stabilizors, and then the decals for the squardon are added. While doing this I also added a few pof the principle decals on the wings. The insignia and the aircraft number. While letting thist dry, I completed the weapons supplied by the kit that I intend to add to the aircraft. These are the Sidewinder missiles, the AMRAAM missiles and the HARM missiles. I either used old decals, or hand painted these appropriately. The box and cover of the instructions show them, but, outside of that, they are not adequately covered in either the paint scheme or the instructions. I then added these weapons to their pylons in a little different order than I originally planned. Sidewinder missiles on the wingtips, AMRAAMs on the first outboard Pylon on each wing, HARMs on the center pylon on each wing...and I will add the HArpoons from my weapon set to the inside pylon on each wing.

Looking good.



Finally, I painted and added the crew ladder. This unfols from the wing on that side and then hangs down from the forward portion of the wing root. I also added the main canopy at the angle, showing it open. The aircraft is looking very good at this point.

A few antennae and the Harpoon missiles and the structural building part of the model will be completed. I will then need to add the rest of the many, many decals. That will be time consuming, but, hopefully I can do all of that over this coming weekend and complete my F/A-18F US Navy Strike fighter.

The Build - Harpoon Missiles, Decals, Completing the Aircraft - April 7, 2014

In order to finish the aircraft as I desired, I added a couple of AGM-84 Harpoon missiles to the inboard pylons on the aircraft, replacing the additional fuel tanks the model came with. I added these from a Testor's 1/72 scale US/NATO AArmament kit that I had. I always keep around spar 1/72 scale armaments from other kits I do not use too. For example, I will be keeping the bombs and additional fuel tanks that I do not use from this aircraft. You never know when they may come in handy.

Then it was time to put on the rest of the decals for this model. There are a lot of them. The VFA-103 Jolly Rodgers have the more apparent, high contrast markings which are used for the model I am building. The other aircraft that can be built with this model has markings that are low contrast.

Anyhow, from the names of the pilots and maintenance personnel, to the various warning panels and the insignia, aircraft numbers, weapon's stiping (some of which I painted on where appropriate), and decals for the various luevered and meshed inlet panels on the aircraft, there wer a lot of decals, some of them very small and delicate. But they all got on there:

Once this was all done, it was time for touch up painting for any areas that had been painted earlier and mat have been impacted during the build, and then for the coats of dull coat that help with the overall titing and look of these military models. I always apply a couple of good coats. One has to be carefulk to ensure that the decals dry and that the coaot is not so heavy that it causes any of the decals to come loose or become distorted from too much paint as it sits in it before the paint dries.





Finally, three more to show how this F/A-18F truly is heavily laden with weapons, and how well this aircraft can perform its mission of projecting US interests and powerwhenever and whereever necessary.





Very nice indeed.

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Sarasota, FL
Posted by RedCorvette on Thursday, April 3, 2014 2:29 PM

You pictures don't seem to have loaded.  

I've also got this kit in my stash and look forward to building it.  

Mark

FSM Charter Subscriber

  • Member since
    July 2012
  • From: Idaho, USA
Posted by Jeff Head on Thursday, April 3, 2014 4:38 PM

Hmm, RedCorvette, I can see them all here. They are the same pics on my own site at:

Jeff Head's 1/72 Scale F/A-18F Super Hornet by Revell

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Sarasota, FL
Posted by RedCorvette on Friday, April 4, 2014 10:02 AM

I can see them now.  Just red 'X's yesterday.

Thanks for sharing.

Mark

FSM Charter Subscriber

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: 29° 58' N 95° 21' W
Posted by seasick on Sunday, April 6, 2014 12:16 AM

The United States Marine Corps doesn't operate the Super-Hornet.

Chasing the ultimate build.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: State of Mississippi. State motto: Virtute et armis (By valor and arms)
Posted by mississippivol on Sunday, April 6, 2014 9:00 AM

Are the instrument panels flat with no detail other than the decals? The Hasegawa kit has flat panels, and could use some 3D relief.

  • Member since
    December 2013
  • From: Greenville, TX.
Posted by Raymond G on Sunday, April 6, 2014 9:24 AM

Looks awesome!  The first two aircraft I saw after 9/11 was a P-3, escorted by a VERY ANGRY looking F-18.  I don't think there was a mount that didn't have something on it, including a monstrous belly tank and air to air missiles.  Truly awe inspiring...   Thanks for sharing!  Raymond  

On the Bench:

U.S.S. Arizona (Revell)

P-51D Tribute (Revell)

57 Chevy Bel Air

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2012
  • From: Idaho, USA
Posted by Jeff Head on Monday, April 7, 2014 8:13 AM

Thanks. That is correct...my bad.  

And I knew it too.  

The Marines continue to use the F/A-18C/D and are moving to the F-35B, which I do mention in the write up.  I have taken out the one clause about the 500 new F/A-18E/F also being used by the Marines.

  • Member since
    July 2012
  • From: Idaho, USA
Posted by Jeff Head on Monday, April 7, 2014 11:01 AM

The Build - Harpoon Missiles, Decals, Completing the Aircraft- April 7, 2014

In order to finish the aircraft as I desired, I added a couple of AGM-84 Harpoon missiles to the inboard pylons on the aircraft, replacing the additional fuel tanks the model came with. I added these from a Testor's 1/72 scale US/NATO AArmament kit that I had. I always keep around spar 1/72 scale armaments from other kits I do not use too. For example, I will be keeping the bombs and additional fuel tanks that I do not use from this aircraft. You never know when they may come in handy.

Then it was time to put on the rest of the decals for this model. There are a lot of them. The VFA-103 Jolly Rodgers have the more apparent, high contrast markings which are used for the model I am building. The other aircraft that can be built with this model has markings that are low contrast.

Anyhow, from the names of the pilots and maintenance personnel, to the various warning panels and the insignia, aircraft numbers, weapon's stiping (some of which I painted on where appropriate), and decals for the various luevered and meshed inlet panels on the aircraft, there wer a lot of decals, some of them very small and delicate. But they all got on there:

Once this was all done, it was time for touch up painting for any areas that had been painted earlier and mat have been impacted during the build, and then for the coats of dull coat that help with the overall titing and look of these military models. I always apply a couple of good coats. One has to be carefulk to ensure that the decals dry and that the coaot is not so heavy that it causes any of the decals to come loose or become distorted from too much paint as it sits in it before the paint dries.





Finally, three more to show how this F/A-18F truly is heavily laden with weapons, and how well this aircraft can perform its mission of projecting US interests and powerwhenever and whereever necessary.





Very nice indeed.

  • Member since
    February 2014
Posted by USMC6094 on Tuesday, April 8, 2014 7:10 AM

nice build Jeff, I'm not a Super Bug fan, but you built up a nice rendition all the same.

I was out on the USS John C. Stennis in 2000 and the West Coast RAG squadron for the Super was on board with us. At first I thought, WOW, the first NEW aircraft I've ever seen since I got to the fleet and was pretty much in awe of the big new bird in front of me, seemed all well and good at the time, and life went on as it does and I never really gave the Super much thought after that.

Fast forward about 6 years, and I started to get into building the different types of aircraft the Navy and Marine Corps have flown and I got a few reference books on the Super Bug as well as some very objectively written magazine articles on it and the "EA" model. My thoughts then went straight to "WTF" were they thinking.

The Super is a winged compromise that the Navy is turning into a do-all, it still lacks the range of the bird it replaced and it has some very glaring design flaws that were allowed to just be left alone. Case in point, ever wonder why the wing pylons are toed out at the leading edge?

I could go on, and granted this is my opinion and carries no water with anyone other than myself, but I used to give Buear a LOT more credit than I do now.

But again, nice build.

  • Member since
    July 2012
  • From: Idaho, USA
Posted by Jeff Head on Tuesday, April 8, 2014 11:06 AM

You are right.

The Super Hornet was a much needed enhancement to the Hornet. It has longer legs, carriers more, and can perform better in the all-round, mulit-role role the US Navy has wanted the last 20 or so years. But it was never a true replacement for the F-14.

They tried to make a bomb truck out of the F-14 but it was not desined for that...any more than the F-22 has been. Those aircraft wrere/are air superiority fighters. The F-14 was designed for Fleet Defense against incoming aircraft. With its long range and with the Phoenix missile, it was able to interdict incoming aircraft, particularly Russian strike aircraft, before the got in range to launch their ASMs at the time. And that was critical. We gave up critical battle airspace when we did not replace the Tomcat or the Phoenix. We certainly should have gone on and developed the ALRAAM...but we never did. Now with enhancements to the AMRAAM we are close...but that missile is still is not as long range as the AIM-54, and the Super Hornet still does not have the legs the Tomcat did...and we have created a vlunerability for ourselves that our adversaries have been developing the means to take advantage of.

IMHO, we should take a note from earlier years and continue to have a dedicated, long-range, air superiority, fleet defense aircraft. We should also have a strong attack/strike aircraft that can also defend itself in the air-to-air role when necessary. We also need a dedicated EW bird and the Growler is going to have to do...though I do not think it will ever be as effective as the Prowler. In the AEW&C role, the E-2D is as good as it gets.

Another area we really shot ourselves in the foot over was the retirement of the Vikings in the ASW role. Again, they tried to make bomb trucks out of them. But they were never designed to do that. I worked at Vought Aeronautics years ago, and was involoved with design work on the later variants of the A-7 and then the S-3 components that Vought did. Again we have given up critical battle space in not having a dedicated, long range ASW platform for our carriers. And this time against the most critical threat a carrier faces...the submarine threat. Again, our advesaries have desinged platforms to take advantage of that. The ASW helicoptedrs are good at what they do, but they do not have the range or carrying capacity the S-3 had. A natural candidate for this would be an ASW version of the V-22 Opsrey. IMHO, it is long past time ww developed one.

Oh well, as you can see, I agree a lot with your sentiments and have been stewing on it for a number of years. LOL!

Thanks for the compliments on the build. I have quite a few 1/72 aircraft I have built.....

I also have a 1/72 scale AC-130H gunship built...and many, many kits left, including all the modern aircraft for the Russians, Chinese, UK and France. I have 1/72 scale monstewr kits for the B-52, TU-95, B-1B, TU-22M, B-2, TU-

But my real love are the Modern 1/350 scale warships. I am embarked on a multi-year project tpo build complete carrier strike groups of all the modern/current classes of carriers of the major maritime powers who deploy them:

JEFF HEAD'S 1/350 SCALE CARRIER STRIKE GROUPS

Bravo Zulu!

  • Member since
    February 2014
Posted by USMC6094 on Tuesday, April 8, 2014 12:28 PM

Nice collection...........whered you get the P-8?

Actually according to my references, the F-14 always had the iron hauling ability, the Navy just never had need for it until they retired the A-6 and cancelled the A-12, but thats another story..............

One day I'll have a collection hopefully half as nice as yours Jeff

  • Member since
    July 2012
  • From: Idaho, USA
Posted by Jeff Head on Tuesday, April 8, 2014 1:44 PM

Thanks again.

As to the F-14, although the initial requirements in the VFX program (after the cancellation of the F-111B program) called for a air to ground capability, it was not pursued once the plane first flew in 1970 and reached IOC in 1973.

The Marines briefly considered the F-14 as a replacement for the F-4 Phantom II in that ground support role, but even then, the stores management system for ground attack munitions on the F-14 was not pursued and the Marines pulled out of it.

So, yes, it's airframe could handle it...but nothing had been developed to use it because the aircraft was simply too valuable in the long-range Fleet Air Defense role.  It wasn't until the A-6 Intruders began retiring in the 1990s that the ground pound capability was brought back for the F-14...and after, as you say, the A-12 was cancelled.  As a result, the F-14 was first approved to use basic iron bombs in 1992 (almost 20 years after the F-14 achieved operational capability in the air defense role). During Operation Desert Storm, almost all air-to-ground missions were left to A-7 Corsair II, A-6 Intruder and F/A-18 Hornet squadrons.  It was left to the F-14 at that time to focus on air defense.

Following Desert Storm, F-14As and F-14Bs underwent upgrades to avionics and cockpit displays to enable the use of precision munitions and enhance their defensive systems. These new avionics were comparable with the F-14Ds that were starting to roll off the lines.

Anyhow, yes the initial spec called for it, but the aircraft was used for almost 20 years exclusively for Fleet Air Defense, and had no air to ground capability.  In the end, IMHO, only because the US Navy lost the A-12, and because the A-6s were retiring, did the Navy turn to the F-14 for that support role...and even then it was rarely ever used.  The bird was simply too valuable in the other role...and ultimately, like with the A-6s, what we replaced it with in that role was not as capable.

By the way, that's the Bravo F-35 there...I am waiting for a 1/72 scale "Charlie" for my naval collection. Will probably build the "Alpha" too since those aircraft are going to figure so heavily into all three services.

Oh...and the P-8A is from Welsh Models. They are the only ones making it, and it is really a single individual in Wales that does a mix between vacuum formed plastic, metal, and resin.

See my build page for it here:

My Welsh Model's P-8A Poseidon.

It's a little pricey...but also the only one out there.

  • Member since
    February 2014
Posted by USMC6094 on Tuesday, April 8, 2014 2:38 PM

Jeff your web site is NICE!!

Marines being the penny pinchers we are opted out of the Tomcat program once the prices started to really balloon and AFTER more than few squadrons were stood down to begin NATOPS and other training. Then came the cost over runs and the Corps looked at what it had as opposed to what it was going to have to spend for the F-14 and once they noticed they could get three squadrons of F-4s...........

Once we pulled the plug on the Marine Tomcats, Navy contract number dropped markedly from somewhere in the 800 units range to 500 or less, then along came *** Cheney who I think really hated Grumman for some reason or another and repeatedly tried to kill the Tomcat program, but that too is a whole nother story

Jeff your web site is truly a treasure trove, I looked over a few of your photo albums and they brought back many a memory, especially the Coronado Island one, I 've been over the bridge to Coronado and North Island so many times I've lost count. Being stationed at Miramar right after we got it back from the Navy and being from the East Coast, I was a tourist every time I left the base to go driving.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: 29° 58' N 95° 21' W
Posted by seasick on Wednesday, April 9, 2014 10:55 PM

Grumman was able to build the hardware necessary for bombing on the various F-14 versions even after the tooling was destroyed at the order of Secretary of Defense Cheney. The USMC had changed priorities in the 1970s after the F-14 ended development and the AV-8A/B and F/A-18A came along. The Harrier did the close support job much more to the USMC's liking.

The United States government forced the cancellation of the IAI Lavi over in Israel. IAI had several sub-contractors in the USA who had been hired to build some assemblies for the Lavi. Some of the contractors sued the Department of defense for forcing the cancellation on Israel.

Chasing the ultimate build.

  • Member since
    July 2012
  • From: Idaho, USA
Posted by Jeff Head on Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:49 PM

Thanks!

And, God bless you bro...for your service to this Republic.

Bravo Zulu.

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • From: Milaca, Minnesota
Posted by falconmod on Thursday, May 1, 2014 2:30 PM

It's too funny this thread shows up now,  I was just at my LHS and saw this kit, I'm going to pick it up next week.  but I was looking at the instructions and the is step 16 that is confusing, what is part #27?

BTW  the box art is what initially drew me to the plane  and the amount of ordinance.

John

On the Bench: 1/72 Ki-67, 1/48 T-38

1/144 AC-130, 1/72 AV-8A Harrier

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • From: Milaca, Minnesota
Posted by falconmod on Thursday, May 1, 2014 2:32 PM

I guess it is actually part #33.  is that the nose gear strut?

On the Bench: 1/72 Ki-67, 1/48 T-38

1/144 AC-130, 1/72 AV-8A Harrier

  • Member since
    July 2012
  • From: Idaho, USA
Posted by Jeff Head on Friday, May 2, 2014 8:22 AM

#33 and #27 are labeled differently in the instructions.  On the 5th page where it shows all of the parts it is labeled #33, but then in the actual building on page 7  it is labeled #27.  This happens on occasions with model companies and instructions.  

It's actually the doors for the nose gear.  If you build the aircraft in flight, it is one piece.  If you build it (as I did) with the gear down, you cut it on the seam lines into three pieces.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.