SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

T-6 TEXAN, WWII trainer

1398 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Longmont, Colorado
Posted by Cadet Chuck on Monday, August 22, 2016 8:47 PM

Thanks, everyone, for the pix and info.  I have decided to build mine as a US trainer, with no ordnance and polished aluminum finish.  There is one like that at our local airport.

The kit came with decals for nine different countries, but no USA.  Fortunately, I have everything I need in my spare decal stash.

Gimme a pigfoot, and a bottle of beer...

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Monday, August 22, 2016 11:46 AM

In foreign service, this aircraft has served in the air forces of every country in the alphabet. A lot were in combat in the 50's and 60's, in particular in the Middle East.

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    April 2010
Posted by Theuns on Monday, August 22, 2016 10:15 AM

The one set of decals in that kit is for the South African air force "harvard"

I work for a display theam here in SA and they all have the wing hardpoints for the rocket pods as used for training by the SAAF as they are all ek SAAF planes.

 

Here they defenately used the hardpoints.

 

Note the pylons

 

Theuns

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Monday, August 22, 2016 8:39 AM

There were uses of the T-6 that were armed, but not the US training aircraft.  However, unlike the AT-37, the attack version of the T-37, I believe there was never an official attack version of the T-6.  The nomenclature AT-6 was an earlier designation, denoting Advanced Trainer.  During WW2 one started flight training in either a primary trainer, like a PT-17 or PT-22.  Later, it was a Basic Trainer (BT-13) before moving to the ATs.

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: North Pole, Alaska
Posted by richs26 on Sunday, August 21, 2016 9:25 PM

They were pioneered by the USAF in Korea as AT-6 Forward Air Controllers (FAC's) Mosquitos marking targets for the F-82's, Mustangs, Corsairs, Skyraiders, and the fast movers.

WIP:  Monogram 1/72 B-26 (Snaptite) as 73rd BS B-26, 40-1408, torpedo bomber attempt on Ryujo

Monogram 1/72 B-26 (Snaptite) as 22nd BG B-26, 7-Mile Drome, New Guinea

Minicraft 1/72 B-24D as LB-30, AL-613, "Tough Boy", 28th Composite Group

  • Member since
    January 2012
  • From: Barrie, Ontario
Posted by Cdn Colin on Sunday, August 21, 2016 3:54 PM

I thind I've read that a number of African nations used them in their wars as ground attack aircraft.

I build 1/48 scale WW2 fighters.

Have fun.

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Longmont, Colorado
Posted by Cadet Chuck on Sunday, August 21, 2016 3:35 PM

I'll be danged!  I learned something, thanks for the replies, fellas.

Gimme a pigfoot, and a bottle of beer...

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: hamburg michigan
Posted by fermis on Sunday, August 21, 2016 2:23 PM

Here's another one...nothing hangin, but the pylons are clearly visible.

 

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Naples, FL
Posted by tempestjohnny on Sunday, August 21, 2016 1:46 PM
During the Korean War a lot of T-6 were converted into AT-6. Maybe that's what they were thinking

 

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: hamburg michigan
Posted by fermis on Sunday, August 21, 2016 1:06 PM

I have that kit, but haven't really looked it over yet...could all the ordnance be for a T-6 in foreign service???

I didn't look real hard for pics, but this one turned up...

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Longmont, Colorado
T-6 TEXAN, WWII trainer
Posted by Cadet Chuck on Sunday, August 21, 2016 12:40 PM

I'm building the Kitty Hawk 1/32 version of the old WWII T-6 Texan.  This kit is loaded with under-wing armament, rockets, missiles, you name it.  As a trainer, I do not believe this aircraft ever carried any weapons.  I've looked at a lot of photos, and not a weapon in sight.  Can anyone confirm this?

If true, this is a major error by a kit manufacturer and a reminder to never take the kits as the gospel truth!

 

 

Gimme a pigfoot, and a bottle of beer...

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.