SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

P-40 Warhawk, Testor's 1/72 Scale Kit#12456 OOB Review and Buld

4765 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2012
  • From: Idaho, USA
P-40 Warhawk, Testor's 1/72 Scale Kit#12456 OOB Review and Buld
Posted by Jeff Head on Tuesday, December 20, 2016 10:09 PM

MY REVIEW AND BUILD OF TESTOR'S KIT #12456
1/72 SCALE P-40B WARHWK FLYING TIGER


The P-40B Warhawk Fighter Aircraft:
The Douglas P-40B Warhawk was a World War II AmericanAmerican single-engined, single-seat, all-metal fighter and ground-attack aircraft that first flew in 1938. The P-40 design was a modification of the Curtiss P-36 Hawk.

The Warhawk was used by most Allied powers during World War II, and remained in frontline service until the end of the war. It was the third most-produced American fighter, after the P-51 and P-47; by November 1944, when production of the P-40 ceased, 13,738 had been built, all at Curtiss-Wright Corporation's main production facilities at Buffalo, New York.

P-40 Warhawk was the name the United States Army Air Corps and after June 1941, USAAF-adopted name for all models, making it the official name in the U.S. for all P-40s. The British Commonwealth and Soviet air forces used the name Tomahawk for models equivalent to the P-40B and P-40C, and the name Kittyhawk for models equivalent to the P-40D and all later variants.

P-40s first saw combat with the British Commonwealth squadrons of the Desert Air Force in the Middle East and North African campaigns, during June 1941. No. 112 Squadron Royal Air Force, was among the first to operate Tomahawks in North Africa and the unit was the first Allied military aviation unit to feature the "shark mouth" logo, copying similar markings on some Luftwaffe Messerschmitt Bf 110 twin-engine fighters.

The P-40's lack of a two-speed supercharger made it inferior to Luftwaffe fighters such as the Messerschmitt Bf 109 or the Focke-Wulf Fw 190 in high-altitude combat and it was rarely used in operations in Northwest Europe. However, between 1941 and 1944, the P-40 played a critical role with Allied air forces in three major theaters: North Africa, the Southwest Pacific, and China. It also had a significant role in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, Alaska and Italy. The P-40's performance at high altitudes was not as important in those theaters, where it served as an air superiority fighter, bomber escort and fighter-bomber. Although it gained a postwar reputation as a mediocre design, suitable only for close air support, recent research including scrutiny of the records of individual Allied squadrons indicates that this was not the case: the P-40 performed surprisingly well as an air superiority fighter, at times suffering severe losses but also taking a very heavy toll of enemy aircraft. The P-40 offered the additional advantage of low cost, which kept it in production as a ground-attack aircraft long after it was obsolete as a fighter.

The Aircraft was perhaps best known for its use in China, befor the US entered the war.

The Flying Tigers, known officially as the 1st American Volunteer Group (AVG), were a unit of the Chinese Air Force, recruited from U.S. aviators. From late 1941, the P-40B was used by the Flying Tigers. They were divided into three pursuit squadrons, the "Adam & Eves", the "Panda Bears" and the "Hell's Angels".

Compared to opposing Japanese fighters, the P-40B's strengths were that it was sturdy, well armed, faster in a dive and possessed an excellent rate of roll. While the P-40s could not match the maneuverability of the Japanese Army air arm's Nakajima Ki-27s and Ki-43s, nor the much more famous Zero naval fighter in a slow speed turning dogfight, at higher speeds the P-40s were more than a match. AVG leader Claire Chennault trained his pilots to use the P-40's particular performance advantages. The P-40 had a higher dive speed than any Japanese fighter aircraft of the early war years, for example, and could be used to exploit so-called "boom-and-zoom" tactics. The AVG was highly successful, and its feats were widely published, to boost sagging public morale at home, by an active cadre of international journalists. According to their official records, in just 6 1/2 months, the Flying Tigers destroyed 115 enemy aircraft for the loss of just four of their own in air-to-air combat.

Once the war started, the P-40 was in the thick of combat. The P-40 was the main USAAF fighter aircraft in the South West Pacific and Pacific Ocean theaters during 1941–42.

In the first major battles, at Pearl Harbor and in the Philippines, USAAF P-40 squadrons suffered crippling losses on the ground and in the air to Japanese fighters such as the Ki-43 Oscar and A6M Zero. During the attack on Pearl Harbor, a few P-40s managed to shoot down several Japanese planes, most notably by George Welch and Kenneth Taylor.

However, in the Dutch East Indies campaign, the 17th Pursuit Squadron (Provisional), formed from USAAF pilots evacuated from the Philippines, claimed 49 Japanese aircraft destroyed, for the loss of 17 P-40s. The seaplane tender USS Langley was sunk by Japanese planes while delivering P-40s to Tjilatjap, Java. In the Solomon Islands and New Guinea Campaigns, as well as the air defence of Australia, improved tactics and training allowed the USAAF to more effectively utilize the strengths of the P-40.

Due to aircraft fatigue, scarcity of spare parts and replacement problems, the US Fifth Air Force and Royal Australian Air Force created a joint P-40 management and replacement pool on 30 July 1942 and many P-40s went back and forth between the air forces.

The 49th Fighter Group was in action in the Pacific from the beginning of the war. Robert DeHaven scored 10 kills (of 14 overall) in the P-40 with the 49th FG. He compared the P-40 favorably with the P-38:

"If you flew wisely, the P-40 was a very capable aircraft. [It] could outturn a P-38, a fact that some pilots didn't realize when they made the transition between the two aircraft. [...] The real problem with it was lack of range. As we pushed the Japanese back, P-40 pilots were slowly left out of the war. So when I moved to P-38s, an excellent aircraft, I did not [believe] that the P-40 was an inferior fighter, but because I knew the P-38 would allow us to reach the enemy. I was a fighter pilot and that was what I was supposed to do.

Even though later US aircraft were much superior to the P-40, like the P-51 Mustang, the F-4U Corsair, the P-47 Thunderbolt, the F6F Hell Cat, etc., The P-40 also continued service with many nations after word War II. Over two dozen countries during and after the war. The P-40 was used by Brazil, Egypt, Finland and Turkey. The last P-40s in military service, used by the Brazilian Air Force (FAB), were retired in 1954.

Specifications:
Crew: 1
Length: 31.67 ft (9.68 m)
Wingspan: 37.33 ft (11.38 m)
Height: 12.33 ft (3.76 m)
Wing area: 235.94 ft² (21.92 m²)
Airfoil: NACA2215 / NACA2209
Empty weight: 6,070 lb (2,753 kg)
Loaded weight: 8,280 lb (3,760 kg)
Max. takeoff weight: 8,810 lb (4,000 kg)
Powerplant: 1 × Allison V-1710-39 liquid-cooled V12 engine, 1,150 hp (858 kW)
Maximum speed: 360 mph (310 kn, 580 km/h)
Cruise speed: 270 mph (235 kn, 435 km/h)
Range: 650 mi (560 nmi, 1,100 km)
Service ceiling: 29,000 ft (8,800 m)
Rate of climb: 2,100 ft/min (11 m/s)
Wing loading: 35.1 lb/ft² (171.5 kg/m²)
Power/mass: 0.14 hp/lb (228 W/kg)
Armament
Guns: 6 × .50 in (12.7 mm) M2 Browning machine guns with 235 rounds per gun in the wings
Bombs: 250 to 1,000 lb (110 to 450 kg) bombs to a total of 2,000 lb (907 kg) on three hardpoints (one under the fuselage and two underwing)

The Academy P-40B Warhawk 1/72 Scale Model Aircraft:
This model is from Academy and is a straight forward build.

It is molded in grey, and there is little or no flash left on the sprues.

All in all, there are 42 parts on several sprues, and includes a clear plastic canopy. The panel lines are good. TThe fuselage is in two pieces including the vertical stabilizor.

The gear can be show in the ip or down pocition, I intend to build mine extended, on the ground.

The instructions are very straight forward and easy to follow.

There are decals for the Flying Tigers in China, though I have early World War II US markings and intend to use them. They are shown in the pics sbelow.

The cockpit is very modest but does have a seat, the main lever and a panel for the instrumentation...but no decal.

Here are some pictures of the box, the parts, the decals, and the instructions:



THE BUILD - Painting and building October 4, 2016

I started off using a tan and green camo pattern, with a pale blue underneath. The nose is red.I painted all of this and all of the parts needed to put the fuselage completely together. This included the modest cockpit parts.

They are turned out as shown:

Also, the painting is distincitve depending on which aircraft you build.

Here are some pics starting with fuselage, some of the parts painted on the spru, and then the fuselage together with the bombs and canopy attached. ANd finally the model together without decals::.

THE BUILD - Adding the canopy October 4, 2016

I then added the canopy to the aircraft. This included the two side panels wehere the canopy sliides baock, put principally the main canopy.

She is looking looks pretty good. In he next session I will add the landing gear, the belly fuel tank, and the decals and finish the model.

THE BUILD - Adding the fuel tank, landing gear and decals October 5, 2016

I added the belly tank. You have the option of a 500 lb bomb ot the tank and I chose the tank for use in extending anti-aircraft patrols.. I then added the gear and the forwad machine guns.

At this piint it was time for the decals, with the distinctive shark's moth, the ensignia, numbers, count of fowned JApanese aircraft, etc. Then the finish dull ocats and she was complete:



...and a few close ups:

...and there you have it. A complete 1/72 scale P-40 Warhawk.


Jeff Head's Carrier Strike Groups in 1/350 Scale:

The completion of the PLAN Carrier group was centered on the already completed Trumpeter's 1/350 scale PLA Navy's Aircraft Carrier CV-16, Liaoning, (in addition to the other escorts already completed) included Mini Hobby's's PLAN Guangzhou, DDG-168. I recently pre-ordered a 1/350 scale model of the PLAN Type 071 LPD, Yuzhao Class, announced by Trumpeter and due out in October, 2013. I will end up adding two of those, propbably LPD-998 Yuzhao and LPD-999, Jinggangshan, add the PLAN- DDG-139, Ningbo, and the PLAN DDG-115, Shenyang, along with the PLAN Weifang, FFG-550 and thus build a PLAN ARG.

The completion of the US Carrier Strike group was centered on the completed Tamyia's 1/350 scale USS Enterprise, CVN-65, (in addition ot the other escorts already completed) included Trumpeter's, USS Freedom, LCS-1, Dragon's USS Preble, DDG-88 and Hobby Boss's USS Texas, SSN-775. When a 1/350 scale USS Enterprise, CVN-80 (or any Gerald R. Ford Class) is released from Trumpeter, Tamiya, Dragon, or whomever else, I will add it to this group along with another AEGIS Cruiser. Whichever Ford Class coms out in 1/350 scale, I will build it as the USS Enterprise, CVN-80.

The US ARG will include Tamiya's 1/350 scale, USS Iowa, BB-62 (which I have already completed), Trumpeter's 1/350 scale USS Iwo Jima LHD-7, Gallery's 1/350 scale USS Sommerset, LPD-25, Bronco Models 1/350 Scale USS New York, LPD-21, Cyber Hobby's USS Independence, LCS-2, Acadamy's 1/350 scale USS Rueben James, FFG-57, and another Flight IIA US AEGIS class detroyer based on Trumpeter's 1/350 scale USS Lassen, DDG-82...all of these models which I already own.

The completion of the UK Group featured the Airfix 1/350 scale HMS Illustrious, R06 as its centerp[iece until a 1/350 scale Queen Elizabeth carrier is released. When that happens, I will add that carrier to the group as its centerpiece. The Royal Navy CSG will also include two Airfix 1/350 scale Daring Class DDGs (one of which is already completed), two Trumpeter 1/350 scale Type 23 HMS Duke class Frigates (one of which is already completed), and the Hobby Boss 1/350 scale HMS Astute SSN (which is also already completed) and Airfix 1/350 scale HMS Tragalgar SSN. One day, when a 1/350 scale HMS Ocean LPD come out, I will use tt to start building a Royal Navy ARG.

The French CSG is centered on Heller's 1/400 scale Charles De Gaulle, R91. I have purchased the 1/400 scale Heller French De Grasse, D612 DDG, which is an ASW DDG,  the French Aconit F713 and Gueprattet F714 Lafayette FFGs, both of which are Lafayette class frigates. These four vessels round out my French CSG and are all completed. As soon as a French Robin class nuclear sub, like the French Pearle S606 SSN is released in 1/350 or 1/400 scale, I will add that to the group. Also as soon as the Forbin D620, Horizon class anti-air DDG is released in 1/350 or 1/400 scale, I will purchase one of them for the AAW defense DDG. One day, when a Mistral Class LPD is released in 1/350 or 1/400 scale so I  will create a French ARG.

The completion of the Japanese JMSDF group was centered on Fujimi's very finely detailed, 1/350 scale Hyuga, DDH-181. It will be escorted by Trumpeter's 1/350 scale DDG-177, Atago, an AEGIS class DDG and the JMSDF, DDG-174, Kongo class (which I own), Trumpeters's 1/350 scale DDG-114 Susunami and DDG-111 (both of which are Takinami Class DDGs which I own), and by the 1/350 scale SS-503 Hakuryu (which I own), one of Japans new, very modern and capable AIP Diesel Electric submarines. As soon as a DDG-115 Akizuki in 1/350 scale is released, I will add it to this group. Should a 1/350 scale Osumi Class LPD be relased, I will buy two of those vessels and create a JMSDF ARG.

Then, finally it will be a complete Russian CSG (centered on Trumpeter's Kuznetsov which I own) the Russian Kirov Class nuclear battle cruiser (CGN), the Peter the Great, by Trumpeter (which I own), the Russian Slava Class cruiser, Varyag by Trumperter (which I own), two Trumpeter 1/350 scale Udaloy DDGs (which I own), Hobby Boss's Akula II class SSN (which I own), and the new Yasen class Russian SSN (which I own), all in 1/350 scale. Some time in the more distant future when a 1/350 scale Russian version of the French Mistral class comes out (which is building in real life right now), I will add two of those and build a Russian ARG.

Recently I purchased Heller's 1/400 scale Foch, the Clemceau Class carrier that was sold to the Brazilians in 2000 and in 2002 was refitted and became the Brazilian CV, Sao Paulo, using steam catapaults. I will build the model as the Sao Paulo and thus start a Brazilian group, though the Type 22 DDGs and the FFGs the Brazilians use are not available at present. I have however purchased a set of 1/400 scale A-4 Skyhawks and S-3 Trackers to build a suitable airwing for the Sao Paulo.

Then, again, once the models are available, I'd like to build an Italian Carrier Strike Group centered on the Cavour and their Horizon DDGs, a Spanish Carrier Strike Group centered on the Juan Carlos and their F-100 AEGIS FFGs, and ultimatly an Australian Strike Group centered on the new Canberra Class LPD and the Hobart class AEGIS DDGs. If they ever build the models, an Indian Carrier Strike Group centered on either the Vikramaditya or their new ADS Carrier, the Vikrant, and their Kolkata class DDGs and Shivlak class FFGs would also be nice.

You can see all of these actual carriers, read their histories and specifictions at my site:

WORLD-WIDE AIRCRAFT CARRIERS

...and most of their surface escorts at:

AEGIS AND AEGIS-LIKE VESSELS OF THE WORLD

 

  • Member since
    March 2015
  • From: Streetsboro, Ohio
Posted by Toshi on Friday, December 23, 2016 4:52 AM

Thank you for the back ground history and review of your build.  It was very informative.  I too now want to build this kit, thank you for sharing!

Toshi

On The Bench: Revell 1/48 B-25 Mitchell

 

Married to the most caring, loving, understanding, and beautiful wife in the world.  Mrs. Toshi

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2012
  • From: Idaho, USA
Posted by Jeff Head on Friday, December 23, 2016 3:44 PM

You are very welcome.  It was a straight forward build, but very enjoyable.  Hope you enjoy it too.  I have...in my stash...all of the major 1/72 scale US, British, Gemran, and Japanese aicraft and hope to be able to build them all.

 

In addition to the better know aircraft, I also have some that are not so well known icluding the German jet aircraft the:

 

Me-262

Heinkel He 177 A5

Arado AR 234 Blitz

 

Also have the British 

 

Avro Lancaster B3 Dam buster

Short Sunderland Mk.III

 

I have a special edition B-17F that I will build in hopnor of my uncle, my mother's only brother, who died two missions short of his last mission in 1944 over Belgium on the way into Germany.  His reains were not found and returned until 1947...but the other aircraft saw the aircraft blow up when it took a 77mm Flak right in the bomb bay.  My uncle was the bombadier.

 

Anyhow, thanks for the compliment.

  • Member since
    July 2008
Posted by scigs30 on Wednesday, December 28, 2016 11:31 AM

Jeff, looking at you builds and they look good, I like the brush painting. Normally how many coats of paint does it take? How long do you wait between coats of paint to dry? Looking at your Peacemaker and the white bottom came out nice since white is a tough color to brush paint. How big of a brush did you use on that monster?

  • Member since
    July 2012
  • From: Idaho, USA
Posted by Jeff Head on Wednesday, December 28, 2016 4:30 PM

scigs30

Jeff, looking at you builds and they look good, I like the brush painting. Normally how many coats of paint does it take? How long do you wait between coats of paint to dry? Looking at your Peacemaker and the white bottom came out nice since white is a tough color to brush paint. How big of a brush did you use on that monster?

I have a number of brush sets that are realy good...a good brush will lay down an even cat bcause its bristles are fine and work well together.

Sometimes, depending on the color, it can take 2, 3 or even 4 coats.

Another thing is to paint the areas around the details and edges first with smaller brushes and get them where you want them, and then use the larger brush to connect them all...laying it down with long, evenely applied (pressure) strokes.

Anyhow, thye do not turn out as well as a really good air brush will do...but they help give it a more weahered lok, particularly if you are wanting them to lok worn a bit from the get go.

Ayhow, I also use Model Master paints whenever I can.  They cost more, but they are just better paint that aplies more evenly in my experience.

Also, I generally do better on the ships...and the large aircraft.  I tend to cover the larger areas more evenly given the technique I use from above.

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Poland
Posted by Pawel on Wednesday, December 28, 2016 5:20 PM

Hello Jeff!

I don't know if you want to read it or not, I'd like to recommend a change in your building process to improve it. The way it looks on the photos you paint the major parts of the model on the sprue. Now in my opinion it would serve you better to first assemble the parts, take care of all the seams, gaps and mould separation lines and paint the camouflage when everything like that is done. The way you do it now you still have to touch up the places where the parts meet, because the camo you painted before taking the parts off the sprue don't match.

Also, priming the parts with something like an automotive spray can primer could help you make the paints adhere better. Sealing everything with flat varnish could also be a good idea to take away the gloss you have to your model now. That could also help protect the decals, too.

I hope it helps, good luck with your modelling projects and thanks for sharing, have a nice day

Paweł

All comments and critique welcomed. Thanks for your honest opinions!

www.vietnam.net.pl

  • Member since
    July 2012
  • From: Idaho, USA
Posted by Jeff Head on Wednesday, December 28, 2016 5:52 PM

Thannks for the suggestions.

 

On some projects I paint thengs on the sprue (where there are scores or even hundreds of parts that are the same color) and then touch them up after putting them in place.

 

On other projects or at spsicifc portions of the project, I do not paint until after things are glued together.  I ave found that there are times when one way has a benefit over another and so do use both.

 

I have not done the primer thing...but understand how that would make an overall improvement...I have just been lazy I guess, thinking that it adds another step and time to wait for the primer to dry.  I admit it would make for a better product overall in the end.  Same with sealing everythin with a varnish.  I have been using my two coats of flat, clear coats to accomplish the same end I suppose...but that clear coat is not the same a clear varnish...does not seal as well and is not as tough.

 

Thanks for the suggestions!

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.