SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

1/72 Hasegawa B-24D Liberator "Sleepy/The Squaw"

1792 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Cincinnati, Ohio
1/72 Hasegawa B-24D Liberator "Sleepy/The Squaw"
Posted by ridleusmc on Saturday, March 4, 2017 8:42 PM

Hello Everybody,

This kit was a bit of a bear.  Fit was difficult in the area of the clear parts of the cockpit forward to the nose.  It led to a couple of nasty seams that still show, because I was affraid to sand too much.  90 grams of noseweight is required to get the model to sit on all three wheels.  I have lead fishing sinkers in the nose-gear bay, under the dorsal turret, and in each engine nacell.  The kit comes with decals for this aircraft during a stateside warbonds tour.  I used decals from Kits-World/War Birds, which show the aircraft as it was painted when operating from Libya.  

I think the model turned out well, but it's not my best effort.  It'll look good on my shelf, but I don't think it's show quality.  I do like it. 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Tumwater, WA.
Posted by M. Brindos on Saturday, March 4, 2017 8:58 PM

That is very well done, indeed. 

I don't see any gaps at all.

Fantastic!

- Mike Brindos "Lost Boy"

  • Member since
    September 2016
  • From: Albany, New York
Posted by ManCityFan on Saturday, March 4, 2017 9:07 PM
I was trying ti find the seam that bothers you, and could not find it. I am sure it grabs your attention because you know right where to look. That is a very good job! I especially like the weathering behind the props. Sounds like you put extra effort into this one, and as far as I can see, was well worth it.

Dwayne or Dman or just D.  All comments are welcome on my builds. 

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: State of Mississippi. State motto: Virtute et armis (By valor and arms)
Posted by mississippivol on Saturday, March 4, 2017 10:32 PM
Very nice!
  • Member since
    August 2013
Posted by Jay Jay on Sunday, March 5, 2017 9:21 AM

Nicely done and well built model for sure. I would be proud to have this on my shelf . I especially like the colors you have chosen.

 

 

 

 

 

 I'm finally retired. Now time I got, money I don't.

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • From: Parsons Kansas
Posted by Hodakamax on Sunday, March 5, 2017 9:55 AM

Funny, we worry about a seam but when you see the actual aircraft they are not always as smooth as you think they would be!

Good job I say! She looks flightworthy and to be a good representation!

Max

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Sunday, March 5, 2017 10:15 AM

I think your being a tab harsh on your self, that looks prety damn good to me. And you have done a damn beter job puting the nose on than i did.I ended up with a big step where it joins the fuselage.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Sunday, March 5, 2017 12:34 PM

Yup, you need to listen to Bobby McPherrin, Don't Worry Be Happy.  Lots of victories there between pulling the sprues out of the box and getting the paint on, nice job!

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posted by ridleusmc on Sunday, March 5, 2017 2:31 PM

Thank you all very much.  Maybe it is just a case of model-perfectionist syndrome (MPS).  I chose the sand color, because I figured that I could do a B-17 in OD and a B-29 in natural metal someday.  I was very tempted to make this example OD, but she does look great in sand.  

-Thank you,

Chris

  • Member since
    March 2013
Posted by patrick206 on Sunday, March 5, 2017 4:50 PM

Hi, Chris - That's one nicely done -24, excellent finish and especially the masking of the clear bits. With so much area to take in that looks perfect, I can't imagine that anyone would even find what you describe as a flaw.

Thanks for the post and photos, well done indeed.

Patrick

  • Member since
    December 2002
Posted by Bossman on Sunday, March 5, 2017 8:41 PM

Very nice work !

Chris

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posted by ridleusmc on Monday, March 6, 2017 12:22 AM

Thank you Patrick, Thank you Bossman,

I am critical of my work, which I think is a good thing.  The majority of the flaws with this one is with the clear bits.  Masking the nose, the pit, and the turrets was a great challenge.  All of which has some inconsistent lines, but I am happy with the overall appearance of the bird.  It does look darn good in my case.  In the future, I will try those ready made masks for green-house equipt aircraft.  I believe Eduard had made a mask set for this kit in the past.  I just decided to attack it with Tamiya tape.  

Thank you for looking,

Chris

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Naples, FL
Posted by tempestjohnny on Monday, March 6, 2017 6:23 AM
I see no reason to think this isn't a great build. The weathering and overall finish is just right. This just looks good if not great. John

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Monday, March 6, 2017 6:35 AM

You can still get the Eduard mask for these. 210 for the D and 220 for the J. And Mointex do one now as well. A real sanity saver.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Monday, March 6, 2017 7:11 AM

She looks pretty darn awesome to me. And despite the kit's issues it's probably better than the Minicraft kit, which isn't awful but not great either. 

And there's no way I'd try anything like that without pre-cut masks. My hats off to you sir! 

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

  • Member since
    June 2014
  • From: New Braunfels , Texas
Posted by Tanker - Builder on Monday, March 6, 2017 8:01 AM

Chris ;

 What's your problem ? She looks great from all angles to me .. T.B.

  • Member since
    June 2014
  • From: New Braunfels , Texas
Posted by Tanker - Builder on Monday, March 6, 2017 8:05 AM

said .Chris;

 Again , What's the problem  ? If I did canopies and noses that good I wouldn't complain . Now , that  said , What is the cause for frustration ? It's you ! Like ALL of us , You are your own worst critic .! Go Away bad man , This plane has got the stuff ! !

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posted by ridleusmc on Monday, March 6, 2017 12:38 PM

I wanted to mention the flaws in this kit, because it gives me more detail aspects of modeling worth improving my skills.  Additionally, it'll help other modelers working on the kit in the future.  

Overall, I'm happy with the look of the model, and it now sits proudly in my display case.  I can work on seams.  You can see the remants of seam filler above "The Squaw" nose-art.  I do need a better way to mask canopies and clear parts.  The copilot's window, above "the Squaw," shows a rough edge from when mask removal took some paint with it.  

I know there are things I can work on to be a better modeler, but the pursuit of perfection allows me to fill my display case with some cool models.  I'm not being too hard on myself, just a little critical.  It's healthy.  

Thanks for looking,

Chris

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.