SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Academy 1/72 B-17B Flying Fortress

6760 views
22 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2019
  • From: Tacoma, Washington
Posted by Coffeepoweredprof on Saturday, May 22, 2021 11:33 PM

She's a beauty! Even though I dig the later B-17s, there's something classic in the early versions. Their features are quite different, and make for a cool and shiny change of pace from grizzled F and G wartime birds.

 

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Hancock, Me USA
Posted by p38jl on Wednesday, May 12, 2021 1:36 PM
very nice job !!

[Photobucket]

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: North Pole, Alaska
Posted by richs26 on Sunday, April 11, 2021 9:47 PM

Many of the B models were upgraded to D standards in 1941 at the San Antonio Air Depot.  The RDF loop was replaced with the football.  The radio room, waist and bottom gun positions were replaced with D positions.  "Mary Ann" of the movie, "Air Force" was a converted B model.  At least three were semi-converted with just the waist guns and RDF football done.  These were 38-211, and the two Alaska Cold Weather Test Detachment aircraft, 38-215, and 38-216.

As an aside, the Academy boxart is bogus, as the Buenos Aires flight happened in 1938 whereas the first B flight happened in 1939.  Wishful thinking.

WIP:  Monogram 1/72 B-26 (Snaptite) as 73rd BS B-26, 40-1408, torpedo bomber attempt on Ryujo

Monogram 1/72 B-26 (Snaptite) as 22nd BG B-26, 7-Mile Drome, New Guinea

Minicraft 1/72 B-24D as LB-30, AL-613, "Tough Boy", 28th Composite Group

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by Back to the bench on Sunday, April 11, 2021 8:49 PM

Congrats on the new job and being willing to step in with your ailing parent. I'm sure that meant the world to them.

That's a great looking build and you must have found a way to get rid of the finger prints because to me that finish looks awesome! I always thought that particular version of the B-17 had beautiful lines.

Gil

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Formerly Bryan, now Arlington, Texas
Posted by CapnMac82 on Sunday, April 11, 2021 6:31 PM

Aggieman
but as of tomorrow, I am re-joining the ranks of the employed.

Congratualtions!

You did a fine job on that Baker.

The loop antenna is an RDF, which was manually cranked in a circle by the Navigator to align it to a given radio beacon.  In later versions that loops would get smaller and be enclosed in a teardrop pod at about the same loacation.  This made them easier to move in the slipstream and kept them from icing up--neither of which made for better RDF.

Also, the Baker model is handy as all the MG were retracted into the fueselage when not in use.

It seems like so many wind up as Swoose, it's good to see one "as is."

  • Member since
    April 2015
Posted by Mopar Madness on Saturday, April 10, 2021 10:01 PM

I am ashamed to admit I've never built a B-17. But I do like the look of these early fortresses.

Chad

God, Family, Models...

At the plate: 1/48 Airfix Bf109 & 1/35 Tamiya Famo

On deck: Who knows!

  • Member since
    October 2019
  • From: New Braunfels, Texas
Posted by Tanker-Builder on Saturday, April 10, 2021 11:31 AM

Hmmmm;

 Now that's a model of the "17" I never had seen till now. That was one gorgeous plane.

Your model speaks to me . Love it!

  • Member since
    April 2012
Posted by nearsightedjohn on Saturday, April 10, 2021 10:37 AM

Nice to see an early version of the rarely built 17, yours is really nice. I love the big waist gunner blisters, similar to another of my favorite pre-WWII designs, the PBY. Thanks for sharing!

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Katy, TX
Posted by Aggieman on Saturday, April 10, 2021 8:42 AM

Thank you for everyone's kind responses on this build.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Naples, FL
Posted by tempestjohnny on Friday, April 9, 2021 4:02 AM
This really looks good. I guess I'm one of the few who like the later versions of the Fortress better. But this looks great

 

  • Member since
    April 2021
Posted by Paul Boyer on Thursday, April 8, 2021 10:29 AM

Oooh! Very nice!

  • Member since
    September 2011
Posted by fightnjoe on Thursday, April 8, 2021 10:11 AM

Very nice.  Did this one a few years ago.  Did it in fictional numbers from the air group that flew into Hawaii December 7 1941.  

 

 

Joe

Veterans,

Thank You For Your Sacrifices,

Never To Be Forgotten

Where you can find me:

Workbench on FaceBook  Google Plus  YouTube

  • Member since
    July 2019
Posted by Hoss WA on Tuesday, April 6, 2021 8:22 PM

Gorgeous Fortress, Aggieman! I love the early tail shape with the red white and blue contrasting the metal finish. Your photos have shown off the elegant lines very well. Well done. Congrats!  

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Tuesday, April 6, 2021 3:49 PM

Thats come out really nice, great finish. I've built their F and really like it and i also have their C/D kit to build as a Fortress I. these early version do have a very nice look to them.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    May 2020
  • From: North East of England
Posted by Hutch6390 on Tuesday, April 6, 2021 3:18 PM

Congratulations twice - once on the new job, that's good news, and once on th B-17, I really like that finish - nice one.

Vell, Zaphod's just zis guy, you know?

   

TakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakka

 

  • Member since
    July 2016
  • From: Malvern, PA
Posted by WillysMB on Tuesday, April 6, 2021 3:00 PM

Magnificent build! I have this one in my stash as well and you may have motivated me to have at it.

  • Member since
    April 2021
  • From: Wichita, Kansas
Posted by Jan Davis on Tuesday, April 6, 2021 2:07 PM

You've really done a good job. Looks great!

I'm Jan Davis, photographer and artist

  • Member since
    June 2017
Posted by Chemteacher on Monday, April 5, 2021 10:53 PM
Beautiful work and best of luck on the new job.

On the bench: Revell-USS Arizona; Airfix P-51D in 1/72

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by keavdog on Sunday, April 4, 2021 10:17 PM

Really well done.  Attractive airframe. 

Thanks,

John

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Sunday, April 4, 2021 9:41 PM

Stephen, congratulations on the job!  Oh, yeah, nice B-17B, too.  It's lovely.

 

You can always ask, I've been collecting early B-17 pictures fror awhile.

 

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    June 2017
  • From: Winter Park, FL
Posted by fotofrank on Sunday, April 4, 2021 8:45 PM

Aggieman, your Fortress is one good lookin ship. I tried the Academy B-17D a few years ago but it was a disaster. I was trying to build the "Mary Ann" from the movie "Air Force", The kit actually had the decals for that airplane. Anyway, an excellent build. Thanks for sharing.

OK. In the stash: Way too much to build in one lifetime...

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Sunday, April 4, 2021 7:07 PM

That is truly beautiful! The early Forts were very sleek aircraft with classic lines! You have done a super job on this one!

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Katy, TX
Academy 1/72 B-17B Flying Fortress
Posted by Aggieman on Sunday, April 4, 2021 6:58 PM

My latest, hot off the bench, is the B-17B Flying Fortress from Academy.  I've always liked the look of the earlier Fortress variants, so even though I have built a number of -17s in the past, including Academy's G variant, I opted to add this one to the stash several years ago.

When I built the Academy B-17G, I had just returned to the hobby back in the mid-90s. I had not yet even discovered Fine Scale Modeler, and as such, the idea of scratch-building details not included in the kit was a future improvement to my modeling toolbox. So for this build, I opened up the vents alongside the wing's leading edge and fashioned crude intakes for them, and I closed up the big openings into the wing interiors that are clearly visible from the wheel wells.

Now of course, none of this is really all that visible unless you get up close and personal with the build, but I know it's there nevertheless.

I opted for the boxart, as I was wanting a nice shiny B-17 with the red-white-blue rudder.  I tried to research this actual B-17 but never could find anything specific to the B variant, other than posts from other modelers who have built this kit.

The paint is various shades of Alclad (airframe, dull, dark, and white aluminum) sprayed over a basecoat of decanted Krylon gloss black.  I've followed this process on other NMF builds, but this one caused me some issues.  When I had completed the painting and allowed it to sit up over night and had begun applying the decals, I noticed a tacky feeling in some areas.  This of course meant fingerprints - big, ugly fingerprints that were crystal clear against that otherwise wonderful shiny aluminum.  I've never had a problem like that with these paints or the process I followed.  The only thing I can think is that perhaps I didn't allow sufficient curing time for either/both the Krylon or the Alclads?

And this model is pretty fragile.  I already busted off one of the pitot tubes (or whatever those things located on the lower side of the nose are) and one of the antenna mounts. Fixed with no issues, but makes me want to avoid handling this one.

I painted the red-white-blue rudder striping, as well as the black wingwalks and "no walk" lines. The other decals performed quite well despite some reviews I found marking the decals as potential problem areas in this build.

This was my 8th build for the year.  I doubt it will be my last, but as of tomorrow, I am re-joining the ranks of the employed.  I've been out of work for a number of years, during which time I cared for an ailing parent and upgraded my skills in software engineering, so finally it's good to be going back to paid work.  Once I adjust myself back to a working frame-of-mind, I'm sure I'll find time to head back to the bench for possibly a P-47N Thunderbolt or a C-54 Skymaster.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.