Hasegawa Engineering Quality

The bottom line is this... ALL kit makers have at least one crap kit. Hasegawa is a quality kit maker, right up there with some of the best in most cases. There are always exceptions. Branding a kit maker good or bad based on the experience with one kit is pointless. They all have their bad kits. Tamiya has the Harrier, it sucks. But MOST Tamiya kits are fantastic, but not all. The same is true for Hasegawa, most are really good, but not all. Honestly, I think Hasegawa is a better "overall" kit maker than Trumpeter, but each has pros and cons.

The older the kit, the more likely you are to run into difficult kits. Most newer kits released  are on a level of quality the hobby has never seen. So, like Stik said. Do some research on a kit you are interested in, watch videos, etc. and you will find out whether or not that kit is a problem child.

Difficult to build kits can cause two things most times. One, they can make you hate a particular kit maker. (which is dumb) or Two, they will improve your skills.

I say build what you like and work through the difficult kits. Don't hate on a maker over one kit and work at getting better. Those difficult kits can be fun at times. Sometimes it may be the only kit made of that subject, you may not have a choice if you want something specific.

BK

I have a 1/32 Stuka JU87G version by Hasegawa staged to build later this year. The detail looks wonderful and most all of the build reviews give it high marks. Two exceptions were the ability to place the pilot canopy open and the other for a wing joint. They most all call out for more after-market interior detail though.

keavdog

I too am a Hasegawa fan boy.  I've enjoyed all the kits I've built with the exception of the 1/48 F-14A kit #07018 where I just can't get the intakes on the model.  It sits  30% complete in the box on a shelf.

Love the 1/48 phantoms, A-7, A-4s, f-15, f-16s, f-86, p-51 to name a few.  And big fan of their airliners.

 

That 1/48 Tomcat whipped me twice,but yes,all those built up great for me,still have a Barak and a F-15 Satellite Killer on my display shelf.

I too am a Hasegawa fan boy.  I've enjoyed all the kits I've built with the exception of the 1/48 F-14A kit #07018 where I just can't get the intakes on the model.  It sits  30% complete in the box on a shelf.

Love the 1/48 phantoms, A-7, A-4s, f-15, f-16s, f-86, p-51 to name a few.  And big fan of their airliners.

Stikpusher is right on target here. Along with the kit reviews, also look at the age of the kit. That will tell you in most cases about the fit. Generally speaking, the older the kit the more issues you may have as the technology as well as quality for mold making has improved over the years. If you compare any manufacturers 1980 mold with a current one you will notice some fit and detail differences right away. As Stik said, opinions may vary and usually do...

Another way to check kits out is to search for model reviews of a specific kit on your web browser. Don't just read one, but as many as you can find to get a better picture of the quality and fit of a model.

I've built a few older Hasegawa kits, their 1/48 A6M5 Zero and Shiden Kai. Both of those built up nicely with absolutly no fit problems. 

Your best bet is to research any particular kit on Scalemates, Hyperscale, Cybermodeler,  and other such sites to look for reviews. Of course reviews are quite subjective, and one reviewer may sing a kits' high praises, while others will damn the same kit for the slightest issue.

missileman2000

I like Hasagawa quality, but all brands seem to put out a baddy once in awhile (except Tamiya).

 

I think Hasegawa kits, even the best of them, have "95% fit" or less.  Meaning that the parts look like they fit, but don't exactly fit.

I'm building one of their Macross VF-1 Valkyrie battroids right now, and pretty much every part needed some tweak to get the best fit.  Some of the parts have irregular surfaces that require filler, and the gun pod sockets are not truly round, compromising fit of the insert part.  The lower wing halves need to be thinned to fit flush into the upper halves.  I have had similar issues with their aircraft kits.  Also, the poly cap joints are too tight where they should be loose, and too loose where they should be tight.

I should add that their latest Macross kit, the Queadluun Rau, has MUCH better fit and engineering.  I have not found any "95% fit" issues yet.

I like Hasagawa quality, but all brands seem to put out a baddy once in awhile (except Tamiya).

I built a lot of Hasegawa in the 90's,but they really haven't come out with many new planes lately,The last one I tried was their F-22 which I thought had amazing fit and engineering

Hasagwa kits can go either way. I really liked their Phantom family kits and the F-111 Aardvarks. Also F-15's, and F-16's. Other kits I was not a fan of were the A-6 Intruder, Mig-25 Foxbat, and the F-105 Thud. These kits were very basic, and fit was not great.Their A-10 has raised panel lines, though not a horrible kit. These were all 1/72 scale.

I admit to being a Hasagawa fanboy when I started this hobby, and my first purchase of this amazing imported kit from Japan blew me away compared to some of the Monogram and Revell (USA) kits I was able to buy from the local dept. stores and five and dime stores I shopped. Good gravy! Did I just reveal my age when I mentioned five and dime stores like Woolworth's?

Hi F35Bart, I recently built a Hasegawa P-38J.  I'm no expert, but for me the fit and engineering was good.  The wing root fit wasn't great, but I managed to make it look OK with some putty.  I like to build planes with landing gear up, the fit of the doors in the closed position was very bad.  It took a lot of putty, filing, and sanding to get things lined up decently.  But even my Tamiya Me-262 had that problem, although not quite as bad.  What made the P-38 so hard was the main gear doors are actually curved to fit the engine nacelle.  Maybe the kits just aren't designed to be built with gear up.

Other than those issues, the P-38J was a nice and easy build for me.  But my standards are probably a lot lower than the master experts on this forum, so take it with a grain of salt ;)