I can definately believe that, Berny. What with some of the unusual schemes that have appeared over the years, both Navy and Air Force Aggressors, you do sometimes wonder "where'n'hell they'd dream that up"... (And why don't they match any of the color charts?
)
However, these F-16N's were delivered from the factory carrying the scheme in question. So we can assume that there is some level of consistency between the initial appearance of individual aircraft, especially if they were delivered at the same time.
Clumsy, I've done a bit of digging and have come up with the following.
First off, in looking at many shots of F-16N's in the original scheme I've noticed that despite differences in the printing inks used in various books and magazines, the blue-gray used as part of the camo scheme is always much more blue in appearance than the color used on the leading edge of the tailplanes.
In comparing the two FS numbers you quoted it's evident that
FS 35189 has more blue in it than
FS 35237. Below are samples from the FS595B website that I mentioned in my last post:
FS 35189:
FS 35237:
A side by side contact comparison:
My own personal choice for the "Blue-Gray" color, or the third color in the scheme would be
FS 35189, or something close. (I say "close" because of the effects of weathering; sun exposure and any of the other variables involved.)
But it's ultimately up to you as to which you choose.
Fade to Black...