SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Spitfire versus Mustang: Which was better?

889 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2005
Spitfire versus Mustang: Which was better?
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 13, 2003 8:03 PM
Hey all!!!Big Smile [:D]

In response to F4Ufan's recent poll, Here's a good one 4 all you WW2 fighter buffs out there: Which was the best all-around fighter, the Spitfire or the MustangQuestion [?]

Lancaster_lover

Cool [8D]Bandit's!!! 12 O'Clock High!!!
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 13, 2003 8:19 PM
Which mark and mod. there is a lot of territory there. ANY Mustang (including the A-26) would kill a .303 armed Spitfire. The aircraft speeds, roll rates, etc. were comperable so it would probably boil down to pilot ability.
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: UK
Posted by gregers on Friday, June 13, 2003 8:22 PM
Each had its merits, the spit had its manouverability, the stang its speed, the spit its development potential, the stang its firepower, the spit its ease to fly, the stang its range...i could go on but need i?....Gregers
Why torture yourself when life will do it for you?
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by JGUIGNARD on Friday, June 13, 2003 10:27 PM
I don't care.......

I would take the P-47 over either of them ! Big Smile [:D]

Jim
Most of us are acquainted with at least one "know-it-all". He may be as close as the mirror. [}:)]
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: United Kingdom / Belgium
Posted by djmodels1999 on Saturday, June 14, 2003 2:39 AM
It's a bit unfair to compare them... Both had different purposes and were build/designed/used accordingly. They also were of different ages. I know a few years appears to be nothing nowadays when an aircraft can easily go into 10 years of development before being accepted in service, then spend half a century being continuously updated for new type of missions, but in times of war, like WWII, development was on a higher gear and a couple of years could mean differences between something decent and something really good. Just check out what the USAAF had in its arsenal in 1941, and what it had in 1943.

The Spit would not have done long-range escort over the Reich. It was not meant for that. But it did marvellously well over England in 1940. Probably the P-51 would have done better against Me-109E, Stukas and He-111, but it was not available there and then.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 14, 2003 5:30 AM
two British designs both had the same engine
silly question anyway
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.