Its funny you should be talking about the Revell Lancaster Dambuster. When I was small, my father would buy kits for me and help me build them. These were Revell, Monogram, Hawk, Aurora, etc. By the time the Lancaster came out in 1963, I was 10 and my Mother bought the Lancaster Dambuster with "Secret Bomb" for me to build by myself. This was my first completely on-my -own-project, and I still remember the drugstore where she bought it for me, and the begging I went through to get it. After all, they cost a whole $1.98 back then. I quit building at about 13, but started again when I was 23 and met a guy at work who was crazy like us, and had a house full of models. One of the first things I did was start looking for the kits I had built as a kid, especially the Dam Buster, and it took tons of time going through model lists to find those kits. What a thrill when I had them all, and I still have a 1963 issue in the box just like the one I had back then.
I suppose they were all pretty simple and inaccurate kits, but that was the state of the state at the time. Except for nostalgia, for a challenge, or for a subject that has never been redone, I can't imagine many people being thrilled to build any of those old molds today (and the Revell Dam Buster is a 40 year old kit), especially with the vast improvements in detail since then. But don't write off Revell. Just be aware that they still reissue old molds, as do Airfix, Testors (old Hawk), and others, and you have to check out the history of some of these models. Otherwise you may end of with more "retro" kits that don't stand up to today's standards. I'm guessing you didn't have to pay a fortune for it, so hopefully its not the most expensive lesson ever learned. If you did pay a lot, at least you are in good company, since I bet almost everyone on these boards has sunk money into a piece of s..........
Build a model today for the FUN of it!
Gerald