SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

P-47 Thunderbolt

1880 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: NE Georgia
Posted by Keyworth on Friday, September 26, 2003 1:33 PM
From several sources, including Warren Bodie's book, it appears that the Curtiss production staff simply didn't have the ability to build a combat-capable Thunderbolt in a reasonable amount of time. Republic built a factory in Evansville, staffed it with farm workers that they trained, and turned out over 115 C-model T-bolts while Curtiss, with their established base of technical support and trained staff could only turn out 40 G-models in the first production run. (roughly the equivalent of the early Republic early "C"'s). The Government cancelled the contract and used the G-models that were already built as test beds for other projects, like the proposed TP47G -15-CU two seat trainer. Most, if not all, the P-47 G's were relegated to stateside training. The lack of Curtiss-built T-bolts is primarily due to poor production output and not necessarily poor quality.
"There's no problem that can't be solved with a suitable application of high explosives"
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by JGUIGNARD on Friday, September 26, 2003 12:04 PM
Mike:

You have jogged my memory a little bit. I think I remember seeing some photos of early Curtiss P-47G's - they looked to be duplicates of the P-47C. This was at the time that the Republic plant was already cranking out P-47D's. So perhaps besides the fact that Curtiss was way behind Republic in regards to production rates, they were also slow to implement the changes that Republic was continually making to increase the Jug's capabilities. It must have smarted a little - to have failed miserably to come up with a decent replacement for the P-40 and to then be asked to produces someone else's design !

Jim
Most of us are acquainted with at least one "know-it-all". He may be as close as the mirror. [}:)]
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Niagara Falls NY
Posted by Butz on Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:30 PM
Hey JGUIGNARD,
Ya know I am not for sure thoughTongue [:P]. I have to ask Blackwolf but for some reason that sticks out.
Yea know what also comes to mind is a wing load/carrying problem. I just remember hearing that the Curtiss a/c could not be used in combat for a certain flaw. What that flaw is I'm not sure.
Well its off to do some researchingWink [;)]
Flaps up, Mike

  If you would listen to everybody about the inaccuracies, most of the kits on your shelf would not have been built Too Close For Guns, Switching To Finger

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by JGUIGNARD on Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:04 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Butz
If I'm not mistaken and if my memory serves me correctly they had wing/structural problems. I could be mistaken though. Forgot where I had read thisSad [:(].

Mike:

If this is true, it kinda worries me - the razorback that is operated by the Planes of Fame museum is a P-47G ! [:0]

Jim
Most of us are acquainted with at least one "know-it-all". He may be as close as the mirror. [}:)]
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: NE Georgia
Posted by Keyworth on Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:17 PM
JGUINARD is right about the unit's association with the 12trh Air Force in Italy. The link that gar26 provided is the most detailed site about the Brazilian contribution in WWII, and covers their use of the Thunderbolt in good detail. Another good resource is on out of print book entitled [u]Republic P-47 Thunderbolt; The Final Chapter: Latin American Air Forces Service by Dan Hagedorn. It has a wartime color photo of one of the Brazilian T-Bolts on the front cover, with the first ten pages devoted to the Brazilian use in WWII, followed by the Mexican Air Force's use in the Pacific.Lots of color photos and profiles. Hope this helps. - Ed
"There's no problem that can't be solved with a suitable application of high explosives"
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Niagara Falls NY
Posted by Butz on Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:05 PM
Hey Herr,
Here are a few pix that may interest you.





http://www.arcair3.com/Fea1/001-100/Fea057_10grupo_Borges/images/Image48.jpg

http://www.arcair3.com/Fea1/001-100/Fea057_10grupo_Borges/images/Image51.jpg

http://www.arcair3.com/Fea1/001-100/Fea057_10grupo_Borges/images/Image52.jpg

http://www.arcair3.com/Fea1/001-100/Fea057_10grupo_Borges/images/Image49.jpg

Flaps up, Mike

  If you would listen to everybody about the inaccuracies, most of the kits on your shelf would not have been built Too Close For Guns, Switching To Finger

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Niagara Falls NY
Posted by Butz on Thursday, September 25, 2003 8:38 PM
Hey gar26,
Reading through your site that you found and I saw this...
The first versions - P-47B, C, D-1 to D-23 and G (variant C built by Curtiss) - had the "razorback" fuselage and a rear-sliding, heavily framed canopy, which made it difficult to look rearwards.
The "C" variant was never produced by Curtiss, infact it was the "G"model that Curtiss produced.
"December 1942: First Curtiss contract-built P-47G delivered; Curtiss P-47G production ended after 354 G-models were delivered by march 1944. This particular reference came from WARBIRD TECH, P-47 vol 23 pg100.
These ships really never saw combat and were mainly used state side for training units.
If I'm not mistaken and if my memory serves me correctly they had wing/structural problems. I could be mistaken though. Forgot where I had read thisSad [:(].
I just thought that this was interesting.
Flaps up, Mike

  If you would listen to everybody about the inaccuracies, most of the kits on your shelf would not have been built Too Close For Guns, Switching To Finger

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Niagara Falls NY
Posted by Butz on Thursday, September 25, 2003 8:19 PM
Hey Herr,
I'll do some researching for ya and I believe JGUIGNARD may be correct.

Hey gar26,
The 357th never had any Brazilian in their unit. By the way cool site my friend.
Flaps up, Mike

  If you would listen to everybody about the inaccuracies, most of the kits on your shelf would not have been built Too Close For Guns, Switching To Finger

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by JGUIGNARD on Thursday, September 25, 2003 5:51 PM
The Brazilian unit was 1Grupo de Caca, and they were attached to the 350th Fighter Group of the 12th AF in Italy.

Jim
Most of us are acquainted with at least one "know-it-all". He may be as close as the mirror. [}:)]
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Canada
Posted by gar26 on Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:41 PM
Try this web page I think it might help
http://www.rudnei.cunha.nom.br/FAB/eng/p-47.html
I also have a couple of pictures if you would like them e-mailed to you let me know
gpebernat
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Canada
Posted by gar26 on Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:25 PM
I don't believe the Brazilians had there own unit they were assigned to the 8th Army Air Corps 357th fighter group in Italy flying the P-47 I have a book in my reference library on the P-47 when I find it I will look and just double check.
gpebernat
  • Member since
    November 2005
P-47 Thunderbolt
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:34 PM
Hi guys, I need some references and photos of P-47 Thunderbolt that Brazilians used in Italy during the WWII.

Thanks.
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.