SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Damn British Airways

1156 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: United Kingdom
Damn British Airways
Posted by cmtaylor on Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:32 PM
They've just announced that plans to keep one Concorde in the air for air displays etc have been axed because it would be too expensive


Gentlemen! You can't fight in here; this is the WAR ROOM!
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: United Kingdom / Belgium
Posted by djmodels1999 on Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:39 PM
Shame on them!
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Alabama, USA
Posted by umiami91 on Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:22 PM
Blame Airbus - they precipitated the problem by saying they would stop producing spare parts for it.

Mike Dahlstrom
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." -attributed to Dave Barry
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:14 PM
Leave it to the Brits.........

Sign - Oops [#oops] !!!! didi i say that outloud??????


J/k i love MG's.....
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:27 PM
they should give Duxford a new concord so they can use its engines on there VulcanCaptain [4:-)]
BA should have sold the Concord fleet to Virgin airlines
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:08 PM
Why are we SOOO sad that the Concorde is gone...

It's not like any of us will ride it anyway. Or am I wrong?Wink [;)]
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Washington State
Posted by leemitcheltree on Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:13 PM
Bummer - what a display ot would have been for an airshow.............
But I understand that those engines suck fuel like nothing else.......would be expensive to run just for display.
Don't get me wrong - I lament the demise of the Concorde. But I can understand that a company can't keep producing a product or providing a service that isn't profitable.
They'll end up like Enron and thousands upon thousands of people would be out of a job.
Hats off and glasses raised to the memory of one of the most amazing aerospace engineering successes ever seen.
Cheers
LeeTree

Cheers, LeeTree
Remember, Safety Fast!!!

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by 72cuda on Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:23 PM
I understand that the jet fuel would be very expensive for the Concord to perform at Airshows and to go from one place to another too but it's sad to see them go but in the world today with nuts trying to fly airliners into buildings and the airtravel is almost to a crawl and they haven't evolved much like their compatition has i can see the $$$$ are more important to save for more practical sorces of air travel

84 of 795 1/72 Aircraft Competed for Lackland's Airman Heritage Museum

Was a Hawg Jet Fixer, now I'm a FRED Fixer   

 'Cuda

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: NE Georgia
Posted by Keyworth on Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:52 PM
I heard a rumor that Virgin Airways was interested in them.
"There's no problem that can't be solved with a suitable application of high explosives"
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 31, 2003 6:02 AM
British Airways, I hereby damn thee!!!

There, how's that?
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 31, 2003 9:46 AM
Littlemoe - leave it to the Brits------to BUILD AN SST!!!!!!
34 YEARS AGO!!!!!Big Smile [:D]Big Smile [:D]Big Smile [:D]Big Smile [:D]Big Smile [:D]
  • Member since
    May 2003
Posted by karlwb on Friday, October 31, 2003 1:52 PM
British Airways would not dare sell Concord to Virgin, becaus they would make it work at a profit and bringing the ticket price down, showing BA for he money grabbers that they are, Air France should go to hell and back......
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 31, 2003 3:11 PM
QUOTE: It's not like any of us will ride it anyway.


There may have been a chance, but now, there probably never will be. They will be missed.

demono69
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: United Kingdom
Posted by cmtaylor on Friday, October 31, 2003 5:28 PM
BA would never sell to Branson since he beat them in the courts
Gentlemen! You can't fight in here; this is the WAR ROOM!
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 31, 2003 5:40 PM
Sad [:(] Sad to see Concorde go, one flew today to Manchester and presumably those remaining will do the the same to their resting places.
personally the news that one wont remain for Airshows is no bad thing, Concorde was built to fly very fast and very high, prancing about at an airshow would be sad in the extreme, just not this a/c's style as far as i'm concerned.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: A secret workshop somewhere in England
Posted by TANGO 1 on Friday, October 31, 2003 6:23 PM
You'd think the British Government would do something to keep at least one Concorde flying for the promotion of the British aviation industry. Oh yeah, I forgot. What British aviation industry!!!?
I swear all the idiots are running the show at No.10 these days....................

You'd think BA would have the savvy to work with Branson and get a subsidy from the govt. would'nt you? Oh yeah, common sense, we don't have much of that here either.........

Sorry, but I feel very strongly on this one. The sooner Britain gets a kick up it's backside the better!

Right. I'll shut up now.
Regards, Darren. C.A.G. FAA/USNFAW GB
  • Member since
    May 2003
Posted by karlwb on Saturday, November 1, 2003 2:44 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by TANGO 1

You'd think the British Government would do something to keep at least one Concorde flying for the promotion of the British aviation industry. Oh yeah, I forgot. What British aviation industry!!!?
I swear all the idiots are running the show at No.10 these days....................

You'd think BA would have the savvy to work with Branson and get a subsidy from the govt. would'nt you? Oh yeah, common sense, we don't have much of that here either.........

Sorry, but I feel very strongly on this one. The sooner Britain gets a kick up it's backside the better!

Right. I'll shut up now.


I agree TANGO 1, the UK really needs a wake-up call.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Canada / Czech Republic
Posted by upnorth on Saturday, November 1, 2003 2:44 PM
You'd think they'd keep at least a couple of them on government service as research aircraft.

Considering how high they can go and their speed, they would make excellent high altitude research bird. Just re-engine them with a more modern engine, remove the seats and strengthen the fuselage structure a bit more and you could do whatever you liked with them.

Can you imagine training astronauts in a "Vomit Comet" that could hit mach 2 and go that much higher than the things currently used for the purpose?

They may not have been real roomy for passengers, but with the seats out there's plenty of room for all sorts of scientific instuments and gadgetry.

I understand they are all still generally structurally sound, so they should be kept up in the air as long as they can be.
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: UK
Posted by gregers on Saturday, November 1, 2003 8:39 PM
YEA what tango said, you hit it right on the head there my friend. my grandad worked on the TSR2, before it he loved his job ,after it he hated the government. i too have worked in what is left of the british aircraft industry but not any more. Greg

BTW Guy Fawkes had the right idea LoL Mischief [:-,]
Why torture yourself when life will do it for you?
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.