SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Sherman Advice Needed

7276 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Saturday, March 19, 2011 1:58 AM

Guys -- thankyou so much for the advice, discussion and pics -- Easymike and Toadman, thanks for the links (TM, shoulda thought of your site right off!)! You sure found a lot more than Idid with an image search, maybe my parameters were off.

I''ve studied heaps of pics now from other builds and historical/museum shots, and so far I've found the commander's hatch hinging at many different positions, 3 o'clock and 6 o'clock being common, but 4.30 shows up too, and there's even a 7.30! 4.30 will be my choice as it makes best use of available coverage, by angling the periscopes to each side of the fixed periscope ahead of the hatch (the gunner's sight?)

I also spotted the answer to the question of those springs on the loader's hatch, so I can press on now. Sorry it took a while for me to get back to you, RL and all that.

Cheers, and many thanks, Mike/TB379

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 6:00 PM

G,  I understand the reasoning behind the orientation. We used to do the same thing on M113s I was on. The cupola on those does rotate with a lever inside locking it in whatever position preferred by the TC. It is interesting to see that Marine tanks on Iwo  and Okinawa often had the hatch opening towards 6 o'clock while Army tanks on Okinawa were more often (but not always) to the 3 o'clock

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 2:23 PM

Excellent photo there! So the cupola is positionable, not rotatable. PTO Shermans on IwoJima and Okinawa show quite a varierty in positioning. Thanks for the clarification.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: San Jose, California
Posted by toadmanstankpictures on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 2:05 PM

Absolutely certain of it!  One of the main reasons for having the split ring hatch rotate was because the .50cal anti-aircraft gun was mounted on it.  Below is a photo I shot of the interior of a M4A3E2 Assault Tank:

 

The openings around the ring are for the securing bolts to be installed. 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 1:48 PM

Are you certain on that? I know that the commanders periscope rotates 360* in the hatch itself.  But those screws on the rim of the cupola look to be for securing the armored glass vision blocks.  The only interior photo I have in a book does not show conclusively one way or another. And considering that it replaced the split ring hatch on 75mm Shermans, which did rotate in the turret opening, it would make sense for it to mount in the same manner.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: San Jose, California
Posted by toadmanstankpictures on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 11:51 AM

Stikpusher,

You may want to rephrase that.  The commander's vision cupola needed to be unbolted in order to be rotated.  However, a portion of the hatch could be rotated by the commander, allowing the hatch mounted periscope to be rotated.

You can see the ball race on the hatch in the above photo.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 11:38 AM

The commanders cupola rotated in its mounting, just like the split ring hatch it replaced. Most photos show the hatch opened towards around a 3 o'clock orientation, although some show it oriented to open toward 6 o'clock. In any case, the orientation of the periscopes is not critical.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Somewhere in Lima, Perú
Posted by Zero Enna on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 11:21 AM

An article from AFV Modeller magazine is available for download @ their website (for just £ 1.00, it is called "Issue 18" , I think), in case you want to build a latest batch M51. IMO, the first thing you have to modify is the main gun's muzzle break, it is oversized. best regards.

 

José.

"Vivir venciendo o morir matando"
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: San Jose, California
Posted by toadmanstankpictures on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 8:09 AM

Additional reference photos can be found on my site:  http://www.toadmanstankpictures.com/m51_sherman.htm

 

 

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: The Bluegrass State
Posted by EasyMike on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 7:45 AM
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Fort Knox
Posted by Rob Gronovius on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 6:56 AM

Here is a build review by one of the more renowned IDF Sherman modelers, Tom Gannon. I found it by typing "build review academy m51" in Google. There were quite a few other hits.

http://www.mheaust.com.au/IDF/Reviews/M51/M51acad.htm

  • Member since
    April 2005
Sherman Advice Needed
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 2:15 AM

Hi guys,

I'm building Academy's 1:35 M51 Isherman for the IDF II GB, this will be my first Sherman ever, and while I'm not trying to be a superdetailer on this I would like to be as accurate as possible. The kit builds without many challenges but the instructions are a little vague here and there. There is no alignment pin for the commander's cupola, meaning it can be fixed in any position, and while the instructions and box photos show a slew-off from fore-and-aft in the hinge points of the hatch, they are inspecific enough for me to have no idea exactly where to fix it. Does one of the periscopes face precisely forward?

The loader's hatch has a couple of prominent spring details on the outside, but there are again no positive alignment devices, nor even any way to tell which way round they go. My Sherman literature is sparse, and after checking through many photos on the web I'm none the wiser -- only the rare photograph shows the top aspect, and none I found were of this variant with the later-style cupola.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated,

Cheers, Mike/TB379

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.