SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Guesstimates on Captured Tanks in Service?

1464 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Berkeley CA/St. Paul MN
Guesstimates on Captured Tanks in Service?
Posted by EBergerud on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 6:13 AM

Been going through KV-2 images and can see others before me also realized this machine was so astoundingly ugly it had to be preserved for posterity. Several were captured and are pictured in German service.

One army using another's armor is certainly common in photos. I think there are a number of kits have been done on German tanks made in mother Russia. (I knew a GI that claimed his unit had a captured Panther with them for a couple of weeks late in the war and loved every minute of it.) I've seen pictures of German Shermans - guess any tank was better than no tank.

No question this happened. I'm clueless on the numbers involved though. Capturing a few thousand A-1 76mm anti-tank guns, giving them a new bore and putting them into service is one thing. Keeping an enemy tank running is quite another. I have seen some numbers concerning French AFVs (low hundreds) used but these things were captured with all parts etc - even the factories. (Guess the Czech tank that became the Pz38T was the best example of that - Skoda simply shipped their completed tanks to the Germans after March 39. Bet there was hardly a delay in the production line.) Couldn't have been that simple in Russia. Anyone ever stumbled on such trivia. We talking dozens? hundreds? a thousand?

Eric

 

A model boat is much cheaper than a real one and won't sink with you in it.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Central Wisconsin
Posted by Spamicus on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 9:21 AM

I don't have any hard numbers, but it's a pretty common practice, particularly with wheeled vehicles. Japan used a few M3s captured in the Philippines against U.S. troops later in the war, U.S. forces are always enthusiastic about using the other guy's stuff. I know during Desert Storm our Battalion Maint. Sergeant spent more time trying to get a captured Land Rover running than anything else. We didn't need a Land Rover, but he thought it was cool. The Germans captured thousands of Soviet vehicles, specially during the early part of the war, I'd guess it's safe to say they used them extensively.

Steve

  • Member since
    September 2015
  • From: The Redwood Empire
Posted by Aaronw on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 10:30 AM

I think the capture of Soviet tanks early in the war was more along the lines of what happened with French tanks, more than in later situations. The USSR was caught in the middle of a major military transition, ammo production halted to work on a new gun, and the purges still fresh so a lack of leadership. Large numbers of Soviet tanks started off with limited ammo and fuel, and were simply abandoned when the crews slipped away after dark making them easy for the Germans to repair and operate.

The KVs get kind of a bum deal, now often looked at as kind of also rans (T-34 is armor's P-51 Mustang) but in 1941 the KV-1 & 2 were way more tank than anything the Germans had, and there are many examples of single tanks holding up the German advance for hours until they ran out of ammo / fuel.

In North Africa enough Italian tanks were captured to outfit an entire Australian unit (I think it was around 100 tanks).

 

During the Ardennes offensive (Battle of the Bulge) the German's tried to field a unit of US vehicles, but could only come up with about a dozen tanks and armored cars and had to use disguised German vehicles to fill out the rest. With the priority given to this, I would guess that indicates they simply didn't have many.

I know there are a few photos of captured tanks with Japanese markings, but I've never read anything suggesting these were used for much beyond evaluation or local opportunistic use of individual vehicles.

 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Texas
Posted by wbill76 on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 11:04 AM

Use of "beute Panzers" by the Germans was quite extensive. No precise numbers are available on quantities as it varied by location and circumstances. Generally speaking, "beutes" were used by police units and/or rear-echelon forces against partisans or similar activities vs. front-line duty as the norm, however there were exceptions as with the Ardennes situation as well as individual units here and there capturing gear and putting it to local use.

Captured gear also was often sent back to the rear for evaluation and then can/did end up in the hands of training units so you also see some unusual stuff (like the captured KV-2) that pops up again towards the end of the war as the deteriorating situation made expedient use of odd-ball stuff from all different countries and types of gear.

The Russians also used captured German gear as well for what it's worth...they created some interesting conversions using captured Pz III and StuG III chassis for example to create their own SP guns and it wasn't uncommon for them to also press normal captured German vehicles into service. The problems you mention around ammo supply and parts/maintenance of course usually kept those types of events limited to various units and for restricted periods of time as well.

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 11:07 AM

Hundreds...

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Rothesay, NB Canada
Posted by VanceCrozier on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 11:31 AM

Manstein's revenge

Hundreds...

And that's just the ones that Manny personally captured! Wink

On the bench: Airfix 1/72 Wildcat; Airfix 1/72 Vampire T11; Airfix 1/72 Fouga Magister

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by TD4438 on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 12:46 PM

From what I've read,at the time of it's defeat,85% of vehicles in us by the Afrika Korps were captured Allied equipment.

Now that we are on the subject,I don't believe I've seen many photos of Axis vehicles in Allied service.A Russian Panther and an American 251 halftrack are all that comes to mind.

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: San Antonio
Posted by MAJ Mike on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:00 PM

Use of captured vechicles may be okay for a short term solution, but long term its a logistics nightmare.  Too often, we have parts shortages for our own domestically manufacture vehicles.  Imagine some poor kampgruppe supply officer/NCO trying to get parts for French, Czech, Russian, and Lord knows what else. 

Even with standardized inventory high use parts tend to be unavailable.  Think how difficult it was after Kursk to get a replacement Panther D final drive unit.  If you think life's a female dog, try being an S4.

 

 

 "I'd "I'd rather be historically accurate than politically correct."

"Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!"

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:10 PM

TD4438

From what I've read,at the time of it's defeat,85% of vehicles in us by the Afrika Korps were captured Allied equipment.

Most of that 85% you cite (a little high IMO) were soft-skins, which were highly prized by us when we could get our hands on 'em...

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Rothesay, NB Canada
Posted by VanceCrozier on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:39 PM

Manstein's revenge

 

 TD4438:

 

From what I've read,at the time of it's defeat,85% of vehicles in us by the Afrika Korps were captured Allied equipment.

 

Most of that 85% you cite (a little high IMO) were soft-skins, which were highly prized by us when we could get our hands on 'em...

 

Yep, they'd pay through the nose for anything with soft skin...

On the bench: Airfix 1/72 Wildcat; Airfix 1/72 Vampire T11; Airfix 1/72 Fouga Magister

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Berkeley CA/St. Paul MN
Posted by EBergerud on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 5:07 PM

Certainly true that anything with a motor was valued. WWII was an era when cars & trucks were simple, at least compared to our time. (Once worked on a Model A: it was easy to understand the whole thing simply because everything was so easy to see and reach.) And in the Depression you didn't pay someone to fix an old car or tractor unless absolutely necessary. As the US was the only really motorized country in the world, that was a huge advantage. We had millions of young men that knew how to fix cars: little training and they're doing any vehicle: more training and they can handle a radial. Enemy wasn't so lucky: Japanese ground crew were famous for defective "by the book" work because many trainee mechanics didn't really understand engines.  Anyway, a clever gent in the early 40s could have gotten almost any truck to run if there were a couple of wrecks around for parts and probably kept it running. A tank would not have been so simple. (My old friend said his platoon's Panther just died and they left it after a week or so. They'd captured it intact stuck in a ditch. Simply had run out of fuel. Nobody could figure why the Germans didn't at least blow the motor. Maybe in a hurry.)

Of course there was one of the US Armed Forces favorite sports - stealing jeeps, trucks and gasoline. There were so many of these things floating around that savvy drivers soon learned it was very smart to at least grab a spark plug if you were leaving a jeep unattended for an hour. Ditto with trucks but on a lesser level because they were more valuable and you could get caught. If someone swiped your jeep an obvious remedy was to swipe a jeep from someone else. As for gasoline, the stuff was like currency in Europe. A few gallons of petrol in France or Italy could get you ... wine, women, song and other commodities you could trade for other commodities. (There wasn't a real economy - cigarettes in postwar Europe were like money too.) The Army doesn't like to discuss it, but there's no question one of the reasons we had trouble getting fuel to our spear heads in France in late summer 1944 was that so much petrol was ending up on the black market in France. Soldiers tell stories like this with glee and perhaps exaggerate. Supply officers that took the job seriously were not amused. But what do you expect? Think of the US Armed Forces as a 13 million person city made up almost entirely of young males with guns with no tradition of fear of authority. (Joseph Heller of "Catch-22" always claimed that Milo was based on a composite of real supply officers. And there were always rumors of trade going on between shady supply officers across enemy lines. I doubt it but we do know that the German government tried to set up some illicit deals with the allies via Switzerland. All refused, or supposedly so.) And we were fighting for free enterprise. 

Eric

 

A model boat is much cheaper than a real one and won't sink with you in it.

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: The Bluegrass State
Posted by EasyMike on Wednesday, March 23, 2011 7:12 AM

EBergerud
...Anyone ever stumbled on such trivia. We talking dozens? hundreds? a thousand?...

438.

Smile

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: North Pole, Alaska
Posted by richs26 on Thursday, March 24, 2011 4:21 AM

 

Of course there was one of the US Armed Forces favorite sports - stealing jeeps, trucks and gasoline. There were so many of these things floating around that savvy drivers soon learned it was very smart to at least grab a spark plug if you were leaving a jeep unattended for an hour. Ditto with trucks but on a lesser level because they were more valuable and you could get caught. If someone swiped your jeep an obvious remedy was to swipe a jeep from someone else.

They didn't take out sparkplugs as that required tools.  You took the rotor out of the distributor cap as the cap was held by clips.  The US military was powered by gas fueled vehicles of probably to the tune of 97%.  All nearly had point ignitions.

WIP:  Monogram 1/72 B-26 (Snaptite) as 73rd BS B-26, 40-1408, torpedo bomber attempt on Ryujo

Monogram 1/72 B-26 (Snaptite) as 22nd BG B-26, 7-Mile Drome, New Guinea

Minicraft 1/72 B-24D as LB-30, AL-613, "Tough Boy", 28th Composite Group

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Grand Bay, New Brunswick ,Canada
Posted by MECHTECH on Friday, March 25, 2011 8:45 AM

I myself have no numbers to give you. However numbers must have great enough that the german army came up with a gun/ammo of their own using the 76mm Russian gun and adapting them to their own vehicles (Marder). My avatar/photo is of a 152mm that was captured in France, a long way from the eastern front.

  • Member since
    June 2007
Posted by jrb53 on Sunday, March 27, 2011 6:59 PM

Good site with some great stories of T-34s in specific German Panzer divisions.

http://www.achtungpanzer.com/panzerkampfwagen-t-34r-soviet-t-34-in-german-service.htm

 

Jack

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.