SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

RWD vs FWD?

534 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Dahlonega, Georgia
RWD vs FWD?
Posted by lizardqing on Thursday, January 22, 2004 9:52 PM
I readily admit that I am no expert on tanks , so I had a question come to mind just now. I've noticed that the WW2 era tanks I have are all pulled by the drive pulley in the back and the modern day stuff like the Abram and Leopard are in the back. Did they discover somewhere along the line that having the track being pulled along the bottom is better than being pulled at the top and over another pulley before the power gets to ground? Sorry if it's a dumb question, just one of those lifes little questions that came to mind.
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: SO CAL
Posted by cplchilly on Thursday, January 22, 2004 10:05 PM
I think that it is a space saving thing as you have to run the driveline thru the hull to the final drive though I dont know why no one designed a trans axel in WW@ but I could be wrong.
[img]http://members.fcc.net/ice9/badge.jpg
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Fort Knox
Posted by Rob Gronovius on Friday, January 23, 2004 7:56 AM
It was probably a limitation of the ability to have the shifting controls in the front and the actual transmission in the rear. Perhaps technology required the transmission controls to be near the actual point of final drive.

The drive sprocket did eventually go to the rear when the T26E3 Pershing was developed. That tank used the same basic layout as most US medium tanks through the M60 series.

The drive sprocket has also gone back to the front in the armored personnel carrier and self propelled howitzer world. But these vehicles have their engines up front as well.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 23, 2004 11:31 AM
The IDF Merkava series has the motor pac up front, this allow a small area in the rear for personnel and provides a small degree of added crew protection.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, February 2, 2004 7:03 AM
I think its to do with where you put the slack.

I work with a lot of conveyor belts, and as a rule, its better to pull a belt than push it, as you get more controle. If you have too much slack, then the belt is liable to jump and run off the sides. A tank track is basically nothing more than a glorified conveyor belt. In my best engineering guesstimate, I reckon the designers must have cottoned on to the fact that whan a tank rotates around its axis, its best to have the side with the most pressure on it (i.e. the bit on the ground) nice and tight, to prevent it from jumping the road wheels. The gears on a bicycle work in the principle that the part of the chain with slack can be used to change gears. Also, changing gear under power can make you jump gears. Anyone who's done this and landed on the crossbar will agree with me here. Keeping the slack on top and out of the way of lateral forces will probably keep it on the roadwheels longer.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Dahlonega, Georgia
Posted by lizardqing on Monday, February 2, 2004 9:58 AM
Thats all some great info. Thanks guys.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, February 2, 2004 9:51 PM
I think Michael nailed it. It would especially be a problem on vehicles with "dead" tracks because the trasck would take quite a beating as load varied.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, February 3, 2004 1:11 AM
Almost forgot to add that the drive sprockets would have to push all the slack under the first road wheel. All the slack would be between these, as beyond that the track in motion would be reasonably tight. Ever try pushing a letter trough a letterbox from the very end of the letter? It bends and folds in every direction before it actually goes in.
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.