SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Canadian LAV III vs The Stryker

9347 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Chester Basin Nova Scotia
Posted by John Lyle on Monday, February 11, 2013 9:05 AM

Thanks to all of you for the info. It helps.

Winters may be cold in Canada but at least there are no mosquitoes or blackflies

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Valrico, FL
Posted by HeavyArty on Monday, February 11, 2013 5:09 AM

The LAV III and the Stryker use the exact same hull.  As Rob points out though, due to th eturret arrangement, the interior layout is very different.  You could use one of the Stryker interiors as a base to start with and scratch the turret basket and interior parts.

CapnMac82

Canadian LAV III may share more with USMC LAV-25 than Army Stryker; even if FMC used many similar parts for both.

Not really.  The LAV III is much larger than the LAV 25 and they do not use the same chassis components.

Gino P. Quintiliani - Field Artillery - The KING of BATTLE!!!

Check out my Gallery: https://app.photobucket.com/u/HeavyArty

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." -- George Orwell

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Formerly Bryan, now Arlington, Texas
Posted by CapnMac82 on Monday, February 11, 2013 2:25 AM

Canadian LAV III may share more with USMC LAV-25 than Army Stryker; even if FMC used many similar parts for both.

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: Denver, Colorado
Posted by waynec on Sunday, February 10, 2013 9:26 PM

from researching the JGSDF TYPE 96B IFV the windows, at least on the japanese ifv,  are armored and provide the driver with more visibility in the current combat situations.

Никто не Забыт    (No one is Forgotten)
Ничто не Забыто  (Nothing is Forgotten)

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Fort Knox
Posted by Rob Gronovius on Sunday, February 10, 2013 8:53 AM

The Canadian LAV III has a 25mm two-man turret whereas the US Stryker is turretless with a remote weapon station for a cupola. The turret mechanism takes up a lot of space in the hull where the remote weapon station does not. Because of this, the interiors are configured quite differently to maximize ammo storage, personnel seating, equipment storage, etc.

Conversely, the M1128 MGS and other variants like the ATGM have a larger weapon, bigger turret and more ammo holding capacity than an LAV III so there is even less space inside for men and equipment.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Chester Basin Nova Scotia
Canadian LAV III vs The Stryker
Posted by John Lyle on Sunday, February 10, 2013 6:28 AM

I have read that these are basically the same vehicle except for the LAV III being more heavily armed and armoured. My question is are the hulls the same shape? The reason I am asking is that while there are after market kits for Stryker interiors but none for the LAV III. Would these Stryker interior kits fit the LAV III hull by Trumpeter? Has anyone done an interior for the LAV III?

Next question. The window around the drivers hatch, I am assumming they are removable in "HOT" zones and that the hatch can close. Is thsi a correct assumption?

Winters may be cold in Canada but at least there are no mosquitoes or blackflies

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.