SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Old vs New

1339 views
24 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Ozarks of Arkansas
Old vs New
Posted by diggeraone on Saturday, July 31, 2004 3:15 PM
I asked this question on the aircraft were to me the older prop aircraft looks better then the jets.So I pose the same question on tanks.I think that the older tanks just look better.Just look at the King Tiger now that brute just says POWER.I like it for it design and lines of perfection.So what is your favorite and what do you think,Old vs New.Digger
Put all your trust in the Lord,do not put confidence in man.PSALM 118:8 We are in the buisness to do the impossible..G.S.Patton
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Clovis, Calif
Posted by rebelreenactor on Saturday, July 31, 2004 3:22 PM
OLD!!!!! Just looks so cool!
John
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Pensacola, FL
Posted by Foster7155 on Saturday, July 31, 2004 3:52 PM
Old, by far.

Enjoy your modeling...

Robert Foster

Pensacola Modeleers

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Texas
Posted by wbill76 on Saturday, July 31, 2004 4:51 PM
WWII has always held a great attraction for me, so by default I prefer the older style.

Now if I had to pick one to take into combat, well that's a different story altogether. Big Smile [:D]
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, July 31, 2004 5:05 PM
Old, but I wouldnt driving an M1A2 either Wink [;)]
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Montreal
Posted by buff on Saturday, July 31, 2004 5:51 PM
Old. WW2 tanks rock! I think they make much more interesting modeling subjects.

On the bench: 1/32 Spit IXc

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, July 31, 2004 7:42 PM
Old for me. I won't touch anything post WWII. I realise I am being narrow-minded, but all modern armour looks the same to me, and it all looks boring. Who knows, I may change my mind one day.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: The Buckeye State
Posted by Panther 44 on Saturday, July 31, 2004 7:49 PM
I think I'm stuck in the Twilight Zone. I think the period between WW2 and now had some good looking vehicles.
M-48, M-60, T-55, T-62, Chieftain, Leopard I series, Type 61 and Type 74.
I must admit that of the two categories the Panther would have to be the best looking.
Regards,
Joe
Just remember, ignorance is no excuse for the law. - Moe
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Exit 7a NJ Turnpike
Posted by RAF120 on Saturday, July 31, 2004 8:28 PM
Old, I think the WWII era stuff is much more interesting
Trevor Where am I going and why am I in this handbasket?
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Saturday, July 31, 2004 8:41 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by buff

Old. WW2 tanks rock! I think they make much more interesting modeling subjects.


Retro rocks, just like 80's music. (Please don't throw rocks) I still find WW II weapons to look cooler than modern. I will say the Abrams is the bomb. Something though about the simplicity of WW II weaponery that just stands out to me.

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Fort Knox
Posted by Rob Gronovius on Saturday, July 31, 2004 8:48 PM
I really like tanks from the Golden Age of Armor. Tanks from the 1930s and early 40s. They look very primitive and mechanical with all the rivets and flat armor plates.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: United Kingdom / Belgium
Posted by djmodels1999 on Sunday, August 1, 2004 4:14 AM
WWI oddities and multi-turreted monsters rule, as far as looks go by!
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posted by ridleusmc on Sunday, August 1, 2004 6:50 AM
OLD - I just ordered an Emhar Mk IV

NEW - I'm currently working on an M1A1HA

OLD - All my builds on display are from WWII

So I guess the OLDs have it.

Chris

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, August 1, 2004 7:57 AM
Old is best as far as I am concerned although some of the multi turreted of the 20s and 30s are a little hard to take sometimes ( sorry djmodels1999 just me !!)
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, August 1, 2004 8:04 AM
For me, there's a depth of character about the WW II tanks that far exceeds anything that comes after. When you look at those old war horses in a museum, you can't help but wonder what stories they could tell. Kind of like an old Chevy pickup.
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by mastercarp on Sunday, August 1, 2004 9:43 AM
I too prefer the older tanks. The recent ones just look so blah.
Scenic Carpenter's Creed: If they can see that, they're not watching the show.
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Tochigi, Japan
Posted by J-Hulk on Sunday, August 1, 2004 10:34 AM
I find them all to be very interesting.
It's also very interesting to see how early armor has progressed, and to see where modern armor came from.
~Brian
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, August 1, 2004 12:33 PM
It's the brutish looks of old AFVs that appeal to me. They are just plain ugly when compared to modern AFVs, and that's what makes them interesting. It's kind of like having a Bulldog instead of a Afghan. And what could be uglier than this thing?
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Southern California, USA
Posted by ABARNE on Sunday, August 1, 2004 4:31 PM
I think the WWII stuff is more interesting, if nothing else, for its diversity. At a glance from any angle, you can tell a Sherman from a Tiger from a T-34 from a Panther from a etc. The modern tanks seem to have all converged on the M1 Abrams look. The M1A1 is an amazing piece of machinery, but it seems like evrybody's top of the line tank looks a very similar.
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Sunday, August 1, 2004 5:00 PM
Modern armor seems to follow the pattern of the modern automobile. How similiar are some of the cars out there? You get the drift.

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Texas
Posted by wbill76 on Sunday, August 1, 2004 6:08 PM
Sign - Ditto [#ditto]

So many variants out there in WWII, most because of an immediate need and whatever was at hand was pressed into service, creating some truly interesting designs. So much variety on all sides, the potential for creating a collection is enormous! Big Smile [:D]
  • Member since
    February 2003
Posted by Anthony on Sunday, August 1, 2004 9:31 PM
Looks like I've joined the majority. Despite that modern tanks such as the M1A2, Challenger, Leopord 2A5 etc have a very streamline shape and look very elegant, I STILL love the old tanks, particular WWII and post WW II tank to the 70's. I like that rough cast steel texture on the turret and chassis(e.g. T-55, M-48, Sherman, King Tiger and Chieftain). Also IMHO, they have a meaner and tough looking.Big Smile [:D]
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Philippines
Posted by Dwight Ta-ala on Sunday, August 1, 2004 10:55 PM
I generally like the OLD ones but I have a place in my heart for NEW ones, too.

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 3, 2004 9:48 PM
QUOTE: by diggeraone

I think that the older tanks just look better. So what is your favorite and what do you think,Old vs New?


I choose nostalgia too.

Kitbash 'em anyway!Mischief [:-,]
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posted by zokissima on Wednesday, August 4, 2004 7:27 AM
I like the look of older rathre than old tanks, such as the t-55. However, no one can deny the massive size and appeal of modern stuff as well.
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.